The DOI matches its OpenAlex record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Trust in Japanese Interfirm Relations: Institutional Sanctions Matter
Open accessAbstract
Trust is a critical component of interfirm relations, and scholars have pointed to Japan as an environment where trusting relationships flourish. In looking for environmental characteristics important for enabling and sustaining trust in Japan, we propose that a critical role is played by a combination of institutional and societal sanctions. Examination of Japanese subcontracting practices allows an elaboration of these sanctions and their interplay. We recommend further focus on sanctions in exploring interfirm trust issues.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Trust and commitment in the United States and Japan
Yamagishi, T., & Yamagishi, M. (1994) · Motivation and Emotion · doi:10.1007/bf02249397 · Cited by 2,392
Cited by
Capaldo, A. (2007) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.621 · Cited by 986
The impact of corporate social responsibility on consumer trust: The case of organic food
Pivato, S., Misani, N., & Tencati, A. (2008) · Business Ethics: A European Review · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8608.2008.00515.x · Cited by 700
Paul, D. L., & McDaniel, R. R. (2004) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/25148633 · Cited by 385
Virtual team effectiveness: The role of knowledge sharing and trust
Alsharo, M., Gregg, D., & Ramirez, R. (2017) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/j.im.2016.10.005 · Cited by 329
Grayson, K., Johnson, D., & Chen, D.-F. R. (2008) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1509/jmkr.45.2.241 · Cited by 234
Metadata
- Authors
- Hagen, J. M., & Choe, S.
- Venue
- Academy of Management Review
- Publisher
- Academy of Management
- Published
- 1998-07-01
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 589-600
- ISSN
- 0363-7425 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2136555101
- Cited by
- 308
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 18.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
