Cited by 986Innovation and Knowledge ManagementBusiness Strategy and InnovationEntrepreneurship Studies and Influences

Network structure and innovation: The leveraging of a dual network as a distinctive relational capability

Open access
Capaldo, Antonio·2007·Strategic Management Journal

Abstract

This paper employs comparative longitudinal case study research to investigate why and how strong dyadic interfirm ties and two alternative network architectures (a ‘strong ties network’ and a ‘dual network’) impact the innovative capability of the lead firm in an alliance network. I answer these intrinsically cross‐level research questions by examining how three design‐intensive furnishings manufacturers managed their networks of joint‐design alliances with consulting industrial design firms over more than 30 years. Initially, in order to explore the sample lead firms' alliance behavior, I advance an operationalization of interorganizational tie strength. Next, I unveil the strengths of strong ties and the weaknesses of a strong ties network. Finally, I show that the ability to integrate a large periphery of heterogeneous weak ties and a core of strong ties is a distinctive lead firm's relational capability, one that provides fertile ground for leading firms in knowledge‐intensive alliance networks to gain competitive advantages whose sustainability is primarily based on the dynamic innovative capability resulting from leveraging a dual network architecture. Copyright © 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/smj.621

Cites

60 of 60 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • GVC networks can be heterogeneous in terms of depth, density, openness, and the presence of structural holes.

    “While a GVC can typically be conceptualized as an asymmetrical or high centrality network with a lead firm at its centre (Kano, 2018), these networks can also be heterogeneous in terms of such characteristics as depth, density, openness, and the presence of structural holes (Capaldo, 2007;Rowley, 1997).”

    From Global value chains: A review of the multi-disciplinary literature (2020) · cites this paper as Capaldo, 2007

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

8 of the 68 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Capaldo, A.
Affiliations
Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore (IT)
Corresponding author
Capaldo, Antonio
Venue
Strategic Management Journal
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2007-03-07
Volume
28
Issue
6
Pages
585-608
ISSN
  • 0143-2095 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0266
OpenAlex
W2004383939
Cited by
986
References
68
Citations by year
2026: 26 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 34 · 2023: 41 · 2022: 46 · 2021: 81 · 2020: 95 · 2019: 65 · 2018: 60 · 2017: 65 · 2016: 59 · 2015: 70 · 2014: 64 · 2013: 62 · 2012: 58
FWCI
79.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Strategic Management Journal (publishedVersion)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Innovation and Knowledge Management
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Business Strategy and Innovation
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences
Keywords
inter-firm networks, network architecture, dual network, strong ties, weak ties, relational capabilities, innovation ability, alliance networks, competitive advantage

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review