CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 7,502Business Strategies and Management ResearchQualitative Research Methods and ApplicationsBusiness and Management Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 107 of the 107 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Strategies for Theorizing from Process Data

Langley, Ann·1999·The Academy of Management Review
DOI 10.5465/amr.1999.2553248
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

In this article I describe and compare a number of alternative generic strategies for the analysis of process data, looking at the consequences of these strategies for emerging theories. I evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of the strategies in terms of their capacity to generate theory that is accurate, parsimonious, general, and useful and suggest that method and theory are inextricably intertwined, that multiple strategies are often advisable, and that no analysis strategy will produce theory without an uncodifiable creative leap, however small. Finally, I argue that there is room in the organizational research literature for more openness within the academic community toward a variety of forms of coupling between theory and data.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/259349

Cites

107 of 107 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

Show all 106 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 5,001–5,100 of 7,502

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Langley, A.
Affiliations
Université du Québec à Montréal (CA)
Corresponding author
Langley, Ann
ORCID
Langley, Ann
Venue
The Academy of Management Review
Publisher
Academy of Management
Published
1999-10
Volume
24
Issue
4
Pages
691
ISSN
0363-7425 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.5465/amr.1999.2553248
OpenAlex
W2115497642
Semantic Scholar
419fd94ab6cccf99829edebee437ef9755829fba
Cited by
7,008
References
106
Citations by year
2026: 578 · 2025: 535 · 2024: 482 · 2023: 445 · 2022: 507 · 2021: 504 · 2020: 450 · 2019: 398 · 2018: 374 · 2017: 329 · 2016: 267 · 2015: 289 · 2014: 283 · 2013: 261 · 2012: 231
FWCI
28.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Academy of Management Review (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Business Strategies and Management Research
  • Social Sciences › Education › Qualitative Research Methods and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Business and International Management › Business and Management Studies
Keywords
process data, theorizing, theory generation, parsimony, generalizability, organizational analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review