Cited by 954Ethics in Business and EducationWorkplace Spirituality and LeadershipReligion, Spirituality, and Psychology

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Religiosity and Ethical Behavior in Organizations: A Symbolic Interactionist Perspective

Weaver, Gary R., Agle, Bradley R.·2002·The Academy of Management Review

Abstract

Claims that religion can influence ethical behavior in business are plausible to many people but problematic in light of existing research. Our analysis indicates that religious role expectations, internalized as a religious self-identity, can influence ethical behavior. However, relationships of religious role expectations to behavior are moderated by religious identity salience and religious motivational orientation. We conclude by discussing the influence of organizational context on religious identity salience and the need for innovative and interdisciplinary empirical research on religion and ethical behavior in organizations.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/4134370

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 4 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 954

Metadata

Authors
Weaver, G. R., & Agle, B. R.
Affiliations
  • University of Delaware (US)
  • University of Pittsburgh (US)
Venue
The Academy of Management Review
Published
2002-01
Volume
27
Issue
1
Pages
77
ISSN
0363-7425 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2156092314
Cited by
954
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 29 · 2025: 45 · 2024: 60 · 2023: 58 · 2022: 75 · 2021: 75 · 2020: 69 · 2019: 61 · 2018: 57 · 2017: 55 · 2016: 46 · 2015: 52 · 2014: 42 · 2013: 45 · 2012: 33
FWCI
25.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Academy of Management Review (publishedVersion)
  • DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Ethics in Business and Education
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Workplace Spirituality and Leadership
  • Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
Keywords
religiosity, symbolic interactionism, religion and business ethics, organizational context

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review