The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Mirror, Mirror on the Wall: Culture's Consequences in A Value Test of its Own Design
Abstract
The paper offers a critical reading of Geert Hofstede's (1980) Culture's Consequences using an analytical strategy where the book is mirrored against itself and analyzed in terms of its own proposed value dimensions. “Mirroring” unravels the book's normative viewpoint and political subtext and exposes discursive interests in its research process. Making all this evident in the canonical book's own terms, this paper communicates critical concerns across paradigm boundaries. It indicates the need to reconsider concepts and convictions that predominate cross-cultural research and to adopt norms of reflexivity that transcend existing notions of “cultural relativism.”
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Handbook of Qualitative Research
Crozier, G., Denzin, N., & Lincoln, Y. (1994) · British Journal of Educational Studies · doi:10.2307/3121684 · Cited by 26,666
Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind.
Triandis, H. C., & Hofstede, G. (1993) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2393257 · Cited by 17,696
The case for motivated reasoning.
Kunda, Z. (1990) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.108.3.480 · Cited by 9,022
Rethinking individualism and collectivism: Evaluation of theoretical assumptions and meta-analyses.
Oyserman, D., Coon, H. M., & Kemmelmeier, M. (2002) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.128.1.3 · Cited by 5,758
Multiparadigm perspectives on theory building
Gioia, D. A., & Pitre, E. (1990) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.1990.4310758 · Cited by 1,426
Kitayama, S. (2002) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.128.1.89 · Cited by 465
Cited by
Taras, V., Kirkman, B. L., & Steel, P. (2010) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0018938 · Cited by 1,160
Are Scores on Hofstede's Dimensions of National Culture Stable over Time? A Cohort Analysis
Beugelsdijk, S., Maseland, R., & van Hoorn, A. (2015) · Global Strategy Journal · doi:10.1002/gsj.1098 · Cited by 455
Dimensions and Dynamics of National Culture: Synthesizing Hofstede With Inglehart
Beugelsdijk, S., & Welzel, C. (2018) · Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology · doi:10.1177/0022022118798505 · Cited by 461
“While Hofstede has been questioned for presuming a too stable notion of national culture, his framework has also been questioned for overestimating the number of dimensions, misinterpreting their meaning, and using data of questionable quality (Ailon, 2008; Baskerville, 2003; Baskerville-Morley, 2005; Fang, 2003; McSw…”
BackgroundKim, S. (2017) · International Review of Administrative Sciences · doi:10.1177/0020852315596214 · Cited by 86
Gibson, C. B., & McDaniel, D. M. (2010) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691610375560 · Cited by 43
Culturally sensitive psychotherapy—technique or attitude?
Stingl, M., & Hanewald, B. (2025) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1599855 · Cited by 35
Metadata
- Authors
- Ailon, G.
- Venue
- Academy of Management Review
- Publisher
- Academy of Management
- Published
- 2008-10
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 885-904
- ISSN
- 0363-7425 (ISSN-L)
- 1930-3807
- OpenAlex
- W2007733958
- Cited by
- 350
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 23.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
