The DOI matches its Crossref record; 164 of the 164 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Reconceptualizing Workplace Commitment to Redress a Stretched Construct: Revisiting Assumptions and Removing Confounds
Abstract
To better understand the workplace commitments experienced by organizational members, we reconceptualize commitment to highlight its distinctiveness and improve its applicability across all workplace targets. We present a continuum of psychological bonds and reconceptualize commitment as a particular type of bond reflecting volitional dedication and responsibility for a target. We then present a process model applicable to any workplace target to bring clarity, consistency, and synergy to the research and management of workplace commitments.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The theory of planned behavior
Ajzen, I. (1991) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-t · Cited by 90,587
Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1914185 · Cited by 48,524
Self-efficacy: The exercise of control
Bandura, A., Freeman, W. H., & Lightsey, R. (1999) · Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy · doi:10.1891/0889-8391.13.2.158 · Cited by 46,835
Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1988) · Decision, Probability and Utility · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511609220.014 · Cited by 32,474
(1980) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 25,810
A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance
Festinger, L. (1957) · doi:10.1515/9781503620766 · Cited by 24,241
Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement.
Rotter, J. B. (1966) · Psychological Monographs: General and Applied · doi:10.1037/h0092976 · Cited by 21,937
A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance
(2017) · Macat Library eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781912282432 · Cited by 18,122
Culture's Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values.
Sorge, A., & Hofstede, G. (1983) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2393017 · Cited by 15,062
(2002) · Cited by 13,211
Cited by
One hundred years of employee turnover theory and research.
Hom, P. W., Lee, T. W., Shaw, J. D., & Hausknecht, J. P. (2017) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/apl0000103 · Cited by 1,013
Reviewing employee turnover: Focusing on proximal withdrawal states and an expanded criterion.
Hom, P. W., Mitchell, T. R., Lee, T. W., & Griffeth, R. W. (2012) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/a0027983 · Cited by 608
A person‐centered approach to commitment research: Theory, research, and methodology
Meyer, J. P., & Morin, A. J. S. (2016) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.2085 · Cited by 487
Raineri, N., & Paillé, P. (2016) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-015-2548-x · Cited by 432
Bal, P. M., Kooij, D. T. A. M., & De Jong, S. B. (2013) · Journal of Management Studies · doi:10.1111/joms.12028 · Cited by 324
Metadata
- Authors
- Klein, H. J., Molloy, J. C., & Brinsfield, C. T.
- Venue
- Academy of Management Review
- Publisher
- Academy of Management
- Published
- 2012-01
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 130-151
- ISSN
- 0363-7425 (ISSN-L)
- 1930-3807
- OpenAlex
- W2100875432
- Cited by
- 385
- References
- 164
- FWCI
- 32.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Reconceptualizing Workplace Commitment to Redress a Stretched Construct: Revisiting Assumptions and Removing Confounds. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5465/amr.2010.0018
- The paper
- Klein, H. J., Molloy, J. C., & Brinsfield, C. T. (2012). Reconceptualizing Workplace Commitment to Redress a Stretched Construct: Revisiting Assumptions and Removing Confounds. Academy of Management Review. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2010.0018
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
