Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 324

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 88 of the 88 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

How Do Developmental and Accommodative HRM Enhance Employee Engagement and Commitment? The Role of Psychological Contract and SOC Strategies

Open access
Bal, P. Matthijs, Kooij, Dorien T. A. M., De Jong, Simon B.·2013·Journal of Management Studies
DOI 10.1111/joms.12028
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

In the context of the changing workforce, this study introduced two perspectives on HRM and distinguished universalistic developmental HRM from contingent accommodative HRM. We predicted two separate pathways for the effects on two employee outcomes: work engagement and affective commitment. We expected that developmental HRM would universally relate to employee outcomes by rebalancing the psychological contract between the employee and organization into a less transactional to a more relational contract. We also predicted that accommodative HRM would relate to outcomes only when fulfilling specific needs of employees, associated with their selecting, optimizing, and compensating strategies. Results of a multilevel study among 1058 employees in 17 healthcare units fully supported our expectations regarding the role of the psychological contract. Additionally, we found support for the expected roles of selection and compensation, but not for optimization strategy. This study contributes to the literature by demonstrating that HRM relates to employee outcomes through multiple pathways, which can be either universal or contingent.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/joms.12028

Cites

88 of 88 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 88 references

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. 10.1177/014920630302900107 · doi:10.1177/014920630302900107 · Paper page
  2. 10.2307/256713 · doi:10.2307/256713 · Paper page
  3. 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1379(1998)19:1 <649::AID-JOB970>3.0.CO;2-T · doi:10.1002/(sici)1099-1379(1998)19:1
  4. Jöreskog K., 2008, Lisrel 8.80
  5. Klein K. J., 2000, Multilevel Theory Research and Methods in Organisations, 531
  6. 10.5465/amr.1999.1580439 · doi:10.5465/amr.1999.1580439 · Paper page
  7. Rasbash J., 2000, Mlwin Version 2.1: Interactive Software for Multilevel Analysis
  8. Shore L. M., 1995, Organizational Politics, Justice and Support: Managing Social Climate at Work, 149

Cited by

See all 324

Metadata

Authors
Bal, P. M., Kooij, D. T. A. M., & De Jong, S. B.
Venue
Journal of Management Studies
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2013-05-20
Volume
50
Issue
4
Pages
545-572
ISSN
  • 0022-2380 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-6486
DOI
10.1111/joms.12028
OpenAlex
W1909679789
Cited by
324
References
88
FWCI
39.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green
Licence
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor (vor)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: How Do Developmental and Accommodative HRM Enhance Employee Engagement and Commitment? The Role of Psychological Contract and SOC Strategies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/joms.12028
The paper
Bal, P. M., Kooij, D. T. A. M., & De Jong, S. B. (2013). How Do Developmental and Accommodative HRM Enhance Employee Engagement and Commitment? The Role of Psychological Contract and SOC Strategies. Journal of Management Studies. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12028

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.