The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Matter of Life or Death: How Extreme Context Research Matters for Management and Organization Studies
Abstract
Organization scholarship has seen an escalation of interest in research into extremes. Comprising several interconnected domains, this growing body of research is decidedly fragmented. This fragmentation risks limiting its potential for advancing management and organization studies. Drawing on 138 articles published in top-tier journals between 1980 and 2015, the purpose of this review is to resolve some of this fragmentation by sharpening definitions and by developing a context-specific typology to help differentiate between contributions from research into risky contexts, emergency contexts, and disrupted contexts. Doing so allows us to let the various literatures speak to each other and to outline ways to enhance the cumulative potential of extreme context research.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Swift Trust and Temporary Groups
Meyerson, D., Weick, K. E., & Kramer, R. M. (1996) · Trust in Organizations: Frontiers of Theory and Research · doi:10.4135/9781452243610.n9 · Cited by 1,982
Organizational Response to Adversity: Fusing Crisis Management and Resilience Research Streams
Williams, T. A., Gruber, D. A., Sutcliffe, K. M., Shepherd, D. A., & Zhao, E. Y. (2017) · Academy of Management Annals · doi:10.5465/annals.2015.0134 · Cited by 1,945 · cited 1×
“Our analysis also differs in relation to Williams et al. (2017) review in that it integrates two distinct literatures (crisis and resilience) into a process model.”
Linnenluecke, M. K. (2017) · International Journal of Management Reviews · doi:10.1111/ijmr.12076 · Cited by 1,682
van der Vegt, G. S., Essens, P., Wahlström, M., & George, G. (2015) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2015.4004 · Cited by 742
What makes management research interesting and why does it matter?
Bartunek, J. M., Rynes, S. L., & Ireland, R. D. (2006) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2006.20785494 · Cited by 432
‘Being regimented’: Aspiration, discipline and identity work in the British parachute regiment
Thornborrow, T., & Brown, A. D. (2009) · Organization Studies · doi:10.1177/0170840608101140 · Cited by 388
Doing good deeds in times of need: a strategic perspective on corporate disaster donations
Muller, A., & Kräussl, R. (2011) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.917 · Cited by 385
Cited by
Caligiuri, P., De Cieri, H., Minbaeva, D., Verbeke, A., & Zimmermann, A. (2020) · Journal of International Business Studies · doi:10.1057/s41267-020-00335-9 · Cited by 717
Sample Selection in Systematic Literature Reviews of Management Research
Hiebl, M. R. W. (2023) · Organizational Research Methods · doi:10.1177/1094428120986851 · Cited by 635
Beyond panic buying: consumption displacement and COVID-19
Hall, M. C., Prayag, G., Fieger, P., & Dyason, D. (2020) · Journal of Service Management · doi:10.1108/josm-05-2020-0151 · Cited by 385
The front-end of projects: a systematic literature review and structuring
Williams, T., Vo, H., Samset, K., & Edkins, A. (2019) · Production Planning & Control · doi:10.1080/09537287.2019.1594429 · Cited by 145
Strategic human resource management in the era of environmental disruptions
Kim, S., Vaiman, V., & Sanders, K. (2022) · Human Resource Management · doi:10.1002/hrm.22107 · Cited by 73
Metadata
- Authors
- Hällgren, M., Rouleau, L., & de Rond, M.
- Venue
- Academy of Management Annals
- Publisher
- Academy of Management
- Published
- 2018-01
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 111-153
- ISSN
- 1941-6067 (ISSN-L)
- 1941-6520
- OpenAlex
- W2762064429
- Cited by
- 520
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 42.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
