Cited by 432Business Strategies and Management ResearchBusiness and Management StudiesAcademic Writing and Publishing

What makes management research interesting and why does it matter?

Bartunek, Jean M., Rynes, Sara L., Ireland, R. Duane·2006·Academy of Management Journal

Abstract

This article discusses management research and what makes it interesting. In a well-known paper, “That’s Interesting!” Murray Davis argued that what most makes scholarly work interesting is that it disconfirms some (but not all) of the assumptions held by its audience. Davis’ arguments about what constitutes interesting research are summarized, including something that engages readers’ attention, something that stands out for readers “in contrast to the web of routinely taken-for-granted propositions which make up the structure of their everyday life.” Some perspectives from a Brazilian scholarly journal, “Revisita de Administracao de Empresas,” are also presented.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5465/amj.2006.20785494

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The work of Davis (1971) has been very influential.

    “The work of Davis (1971) has been very infl uential (Bartunek et al., 2006) and is often included in doctoral education programs in marketing.”

    From Unraveling scientific impact: Citation types in marketing journals (2015) · cites this paper as Bartunek et al., 2006

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bartunek, J. M., Rynes, S. L., & Ireland, R. D.
Affiliations
  • Boston College (US)
  • University of Iowa (US)
  • Texas A&M University (US)
Venue
Academy of Management Journal
Published
2006-02
Volume
49
Issue
1
Pages
9-15
ISSN
  • 0001-4273 (ISSN-L)
  • 1948-0989
OpenAlex
W1970959237
Cited by
432
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 38 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 30 · 2015: 28 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 23
FWCI
26.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Academy of Management Journal (publishedVersion)
  • Iowa Research Online (University of Iowa) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Business Strategies and Management Research
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Business and Management Studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Academic Writing and Publishing
Keywords
management research, research interest, reader attention, academic writing, Brazilian management journals

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review