The DOI matches its Crossref record; 0 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Balancing: The Effects of AI Tools in Educational Context
Open accessAbstract
The use of AI tools in educational contexts, and particularly in higher education, has been associated with both positive and negative effects. While AI tools can help students with their writing, they can also lead to the loss of creativity and moral issues. To balance the effects of AI tools, this paper presents two solutions. One, universities should adjust their assessment methods to focus on developing students' creativity and critical thinking. Next, the universities should offer AI literacy programs to teach students how to use AI tools properly. By balancing the strengths and weaknesses of AI tools, the humanities can maintain their value in the face of evolving technology.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Information on: https://www.techtarget.com/searchenterpriseai/definition/AI-Artificial-Intelligence.
(n.d.)
UnresolvedS. Marche: The college essay is dead: Nobody is prepared for how AI will transform academia. The Atlantic (2022).
(n.d.)
UnresolvedS.-C. Kong, W. M.-Y. Cheung and G. Zhang: Evaluating an Artificial Intelligence Literacy Programme for Developing University Students’ Conceptual Understanding, Literacy, Empowerment and Ethical Awareness. Educational Technology & Society, Vol. 26 (2023) No.1, p16-30.
(n.d.)
UnresolvedInformation on: https://www.forbes.com/sites/christopherrim/2022/12/08/the-college-essay-is-still-very-much-alive.
(n.d.)
Unresolved
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Transformative AI in human resource management: enhancing workforce planning with topic modeling
Venugopalan, M., Madhavan, V., Prasad, R., & Raghu Raman, R. (2024) · Cogent Business & Management · doi:10.1080/23311975.2024.2432550 · Cited by 194
Ocen, S., Elasu, J., Aarakit, S. M., & Olupot, C. (2025) · Frontiers in Education · doi:10.3389/feduc.2025.1530247 · Cited by 157
“While Artificial Intelligence tools can play a significant role in helping students with their writing, there is evidence that over reliance on Artificial Intelligence tools by students contributes significantly to the loss of creativity and moral issues (Liang, 2023).”
Zhang, D., Wijaya, T. T., Wang, Y., Su, M., Li, X., & Damayanti, N. W. (2025) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-025-99127-0 · Cited by 63
Mzwri, K., & Turcsányi-Szabó, M. (2025) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci15020199 · Cited by 77
Du, X., Du, M., Zhou, Z., & Bai, Y. (2025) · International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education · doi:10.1186/s41239-025-00534-0 · Cited by 44
“AI can diminish creativity and raise moral issues in higher education (Liang, 2023), potentially leading to personal disconnection and lack of customization in learning experiences.”
Mambile, C., & Mwogosi, A. (2024) · Technological Sustainability · doi:10.1108/techs-03-2024-0014 · Cited by 42
Muringa, T. (2025) · Frontiers in Education · doi:10.3389/feduc.2025.1628019 · Cited by 24
Artificial intelligence in the context of teacher education: emerging themes and critical issues
Carrillo, C., Flores, M. A., & Mena, J. (2025) · European Journal of Teacher Education · doi:10.1080/02619768.2025.2584283 · Cited by 24
“Other research suggests that AI can help students with their writing but over reliance on AI tools may lead to loss of creativity and moral issues (Liang 2023).”
Exploring the Use of Generative AI in Education: Broadening the Scope
Jahić, I., Ebner, M., Schön, S., & Edelsbrunner, S. (2024) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-61691-4_19 · Cited by 15
Abdul-Jabbar, W. K., & Bhatt, I. (2025) · Postdigital Science and Education · doi:10.1007/s42438-025-00586-5 · Cited by 17
“The uptake of AI tools and platforms for student writing assignments has had both positive and negative effects, particularly concerning academic integrity (Liang 2023; Khalifa and Albadawy 2024).”
Erol, M., & Erol, A. (2024) · Sakarya University Journal of Education · doi:10.19126/suje.1446227 · Cited by 28
“These solutions aim to ensure the ethical use of AI tools and to support students' academic and social development (Huang, 2023; Liang, 2023).”
Micro-Credentials and AI in Higher Education
Charles, T., & Hill, C. (2025) · Advances in computational intelligence and robotics book series · doi:10.4018/979-8-3693-7332-3.ch001 · Cited by 10
Navigating Ethical Dilemmas in AI-Powered Translation
Asrifan, A. (2025) · Advances in computational intelligence and robotics book series · doi:10.4018/979-8-3373-0060-3.ch012 · Cited by 4
Son, J., & Philpott, A. (2026) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781009650809 · Cited by 6
Practical Guide: Implementing AI-Assisted Assessment
Trajkovski, G., & Hayes, H. (2025) · Digital education and learning · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-88252-4_10 · Cited by 2
Meylani, R. (2025) · Buca eğitim fakültesi dergisi (Online)/Buca Eğitim Fakültesi dergisi · doi:10.53444/deubefd.1527781 · Cited by 3
Deriba, F. G., Saqr, M., & Tukiainen, M. (2026) · Interactive Learning Environments · doi:10.1080/10494820.2026.2647973 · Cited by 3
Abreu, D., & Perdomo, A. S. (2026) · RELIEVE - Revista Electrónica de Investigación y Evaluación Educativa · doi:10.30827/relieve.v32i1.36446 · Cited by 1
EVOLVING TRENDS OF TECHNOLOGICAL INNOVATION IN EDUCATIONAL ASSESSMENT: A BIBLIOMETRIC ANALYSIS
Hassan, N. M., Rahman, M. N. A., & Sumintono, B. (2024) · International Journal of Education Psychology and Counseling · doi:10.35631/ijepc.953009 · Cited by 1
Namanya, D., & Talibong, M. P. (2025) · Pan-African journal of education and social sciences · doi:10.56893/pajes2025v06i01.03 · Cited by 1
Yang, Y., Li, X., Jin, H., & Huang, K. (2024) · Frontiers in Computing and Intelligent Systems · doi:10.54097/z309gx59
“[3][4]Despite these advancements, language models are inherently limited by the data on which they were trained, often leading to outdated or incomplete knowledge in their generated responses.”
BackgroundPerception and Attitudes towards AI (ChatGPT) in Education: A Focus on TESL Students in Perak
Inbaraj, L. M. S., Hamzah, M., & Apatura, N. (2024) · Progress in Computers and Learning · doi:10.37934/picl.1.1.110
Voices of Change: How Student Input Drives Educational Transformation
Noel, E. O., & Gay, G. H. E. (2025) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-93746-0_22
Transforming English Language Learning in South Asia
Indapurkar, K., & Arya, A. (2025) · Advances in computational intelligence and robotics book series · doi:10.4018/979-8-3373-5092-9.ch013
Dil Öğreniminde Yapay Zekâ Sohbet Robotları: ChatGPT Örneği
DEMİREL, A. (2025) · International Journal of Languages Education · doi:10.71084/ijlet.1734989 · Cited by 1
The Preparedness of Foundation Program Teachers and Ethical Considerations in AI Integration
Balushi, K. A., & Farsi, S. M. A. (2026) · Advances in computational intelligence and robotics book series · doi:10.4018/979-8-3373-4982-4.ch010
Erlyana, Y., Yi, L. J., Saputra, M. G., & Panggula, A. Y. (2026) · International Conference on Current Research in Artificial Intelligence and Data Science (ICCRAIDS) · doi:10.1109/iccraids67816.2026.11519670
Mamangon, C. T., & Maya, B. J. (2026) · International Journal of Latest Technology in Engineering Management & Applied Science · doi:10.51583/ijltemas.2026.150500090
Metadata
- Authors
- Liang, Y.
- Affiliations
- Hong Kong Shue Yan University (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Liang, Yihe
- Venue
- Frontiers in Humanities and Social Sciences
- Publisher
- Boya Century Publishing
- Published
- 2023-08-22
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 7-10
- ISSN
- 2710-0170 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4386083396
- Cited by
- 27
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 7
- FWCI
- 6.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Frontiers in Humanities and Social Sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Artificial Intelligence in Education
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
- Keywords
- artificial intelligence in education, higher education, AI tools, student writing, creativity, critical thinking, assessment methods, AI literacy, ethical issues of AI
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
