The DOI matches its Crossref record; 0 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Balancing: The Effects of AI Tools in Educational Context
Open accessAbstract
The use of AI tools in educational contexts, and particularly in higher education, has been associated with both positive and negative effects. While AI tools can help students with their writing, they can also lead to the loss of creativity and moral issues. To balance the effects of AI tools, this paper presents two solutions. One, universities should adjust their assessment methods to focus on developing students' creativity and critical thinking. Next, the universities should offer AI literacy programs to teach students how to use AI tools properly. By balancing the strengths and weaknesses of AI tools, the humanities can maintain their value in the face of evolving technology.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Information on: https://www.techtarget.com/searchenterpriseai/definition/AI-Artificial-Intelligence.
(n.d.)
UnresolvedS. Marche: The college essay is dead: Nobody is prepared for how AI will transform academia. The Atlantic (2022).
(n.d.)
UnresolvedS.-C. Kong, W. M.-Y. Cheung and G. Zhang: Evaluating an Artificial Intelligence Literacy Programme for Developing University Students’ Conceptual Understanding, Literacy, Empowerment and Ethical Awareness. Educational Technology & Society, Vol. 26 (2023) No.1, p16-30.
(n.d.)
UnresolvedInformation on: https://www.forbes.com/sites/christopherrim/2022/12/08/the-college-essay-is-still-very-much-alive.
(n.d.)
Unresolved
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Transformative AI in human resource management: enhancing workforce planning with topic modeling
Venugopalan, M., Madhavan, V., Prasad, R., & Raghu Raman, R. (2024) · Cogent Business & Management · doi:10.1080/23311975.2024.2432550 · Cited by 194
Ocen, S., Elasu, J., Aarakit, S. M., & Olupot, C. (2025) · Frontiers in Education · doi:10.3389/feduc.2025.1530247 · Cited by 157
“While Artificial Intelligence tools can play a significant role in helping students with their writing, there is evidence that over reliance on Artificial Intelligence tools by students contributes significantly to the loss of creativity and moral issues (Liang, 2023).”
Zhang, D., Wijaya, T. T., Wang, Y., Su, M., Li, X., & Damayanti, N. W. (2025) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-025-99127-0 · Cited by 63
Mzwri, K., & Turcsányi-Szabó, M. (2025) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci15020199 · Cited by 77
Du, X., Du, M., Zhou, Z., & Bai, Y. (2025) · International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education · doi:10.1186/s41239-025-00534-0 · Cited by 44
“AI can diminish creativity and raise moral issues in higher education (Liang, 2023), potentially leading to personal disconnection and lack of customization in learning experiences.”
Metadata
- Authors
- Liang, Y.
- Affiliations
- Hong Kong Shue Yan University (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Liang, Yihe
- Venue
- Frontiers in Humanities and Social Sciences
- Publisher
- Boya Century Publishing
- Published
- 2023-08-22
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 7-10
- ISSN
- 2710-0170 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4386083396
- Cited by
- 27
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 7
- FWCI
- 6.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Frontiers in Humanities and Social Sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Artificial Intelligence in Education
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
- Keywords
- artificial intelligence in education, higher education, AI tools, student writing, creativity, critical thinking, assessment methods, AI literacy, ethical issues of AI
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
