The copepods of the Woods Hole region, Massachusetts
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Copepod taxonomic classification was based on specialized literature.
“Copepod taxonomic classification was based on the specialized literature (Wilson, 1932;Grice, 1961;Dawson and Knatz, 1980;Björnberg, 1981;Mazzocchi et al., 1995).”
From Epipelagic copepod distributions in the eastern equatorial Pacific during the weak La Niña event of 2001 (2011) · cites this paper as Wilson, 1932
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Tutasi, P., Palma, S., & Cáceres, M. (2011) · Scientia Marina · doi:10.3989/scimar.2011.75n4791 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
“Copepod taxonomic classification was based on the specialized literature (Wilson, 1932; Grice, 1961; Dawson and Knatz, 1980; Björnberg, 1981; Mazzocchi et al., 1995).”
Method
- Authors
- Wilson, C. B.
- Corresponding author
- Wilson, Charles Branch
- Venue
- Bulletin of the United States National Museum
- Publisher
- Smithsonian Institution
- Published
- 1932
- Issue
- 158
- Pages
- i-635
- ISSN
- 0096-2961 (ISSN-L)
- 0362-9236
- OpenAlex
- W2084808753
- Cited by
- 255
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 8.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Bulletin of the United States National Museum (publishedVersion)
- Smithsonian Digital Repository (Smithsonian Institution) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Oceanography › Marine Biology and Ecology Research
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Crustacean biology and ecology
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Parasite Biology and Host Interactions
- Keywords
- copepods, zooplankton, taxonomy, species inventory, marine zooplankton
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
