CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 53Artificial Intelligence in EducationInnovative Teaching and Learning MethodsEducational Technology in Learning

Integrating Generative AI in Active Learning Environments: Enhancing Metacognition and Technological Skills

Open access
ElSayary, Areej·2024·Journal of Systemics, Cybernetics and Informatics
DOI 10.54808/jsci.22.03.34
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

This paper explores the innovative integration of Generative AI (GenAI) in active learning environments to augment metacognitive knowledge and technological skill development among students. While active learning has been pivotal in promoting student engagement and learning, the incorporation of GenAI presents a novel approach to further enhance these outcomes. The study investigates how GenAI tools can be utilized within a reflective practice model to bolster metacognitive regulation and technological proficiency. By discussing the synergistic relationship between GenAI, active learning, and metacognitive strategies, this paper provides insights into the evolving landscape of educational technology and its impact on student learning processes. The paper offers a theoretical framework based on established concepts in metacognition, active learning, reflective practice, and technological skills, contextualized within the realm of GenAI. This paper contributes to the understanding of how GenAI can be harnessed as an educational tool, facilitating deeper and more effective learning experiences.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.54808/jsci.22.03.34

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Scenario-based simulations and classroom activities using ChatGPT have been shown to foster critical, creative, and meditative thinking.

    “Scenario-based simulations and classroom activities using ChatGPT have been shown to foster critical, creative, and meditative thinking [29,32].”

    From A Systematic Literature Review on the Pedagogical Implications and Impact of GenAI on Students' Critical Thinking (2026) · cites this paper as [29]

    The indexed passages available for this paper are journal-page material, including an abstract, rather than passages from the paper's discussion or results. Searches for scenario-based simulations, ChatGPT classroom activities, and critical, creative, or meditative thinking found no passage in our copy establishing the claimed effect. (LLM, conf=0.70)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

  • When intentionally integrated, GenAI can actively scaffold reasoning and metacognitive engagement.

    “When intentionally integrated, GenAI can actively scaffold reasoning and metacognitive engagement [29].”

    From A Systematic Literature Review on the Pedagogical Implications and Impact of GenAI on Students' Critical Thinking (2026) · cites this paper as [29]

    The indexed passages for this paper are the journal page’s abstract and navigation text, not a passage from the paper’s body. Searches for scaffolding reasoning and metacognitive engagement returned no body passage that could verify the attributed claim. (LLM, conf=0.70)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Authors
ElSayary, A.
Affiliations
Zayed University (AE)
Corresponding author
ElSayary, Areej
ORCID
ElSayary, Areej
Venue
Journal of Systemics, Cybernetics and Informatics
Publisher
International Institute of Informatics and Cybernetics
Published
2024-06
Volume
22
Issue
3
Pages
34-37
ISSN
1690-4524 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.54808/jsci.22.03.34
OpenAlex
W4399670032
Cited by
52
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 29 · 2024: 4
FWCI
19.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Journal of systemics, cybernetics, and informatics/Journal of systemics cybernetics and informatics (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Artificial Intelligence in Education
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Educational Technology in Learning
Keywords
generative AI, active learning, metacognition, metacognitive regulation, technological skills, reflective practice, student engagement, educational technology, artificial intelligence in education

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review