The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.
To AI Is Human: How AI Tools with Their Imperfections Enhance Learning
Open accessAbstract
The education community's sentiment regarding artificial intelligence (AI) is divided. Many see it as a means to cheat and prevent students from developing their intellectual abilities because it is generative and can provide results for many domains. Just as some had predicted that paper use would go down when computers were created, the opposite occurred. AI in the classroom, when utilized effectively, promotes critical thinking and not cheating. New technology can shock and awe those who see it for the first time. Upon closer investigation, the actual capabilities are revealed. While large language models can quickly create reports from very little information, we must examine their ability to create specific reports on topics we desire. Any large language model currently available states that it can make mistakes. Students will grow by learning how to prompt AI tools to provide meaningful results, spot mistakes, and validate their results. Knowing when it is appropriate to use an AI tool and reflecting on the consequences of results being wrong brings a student to a higher level of awareness. Performing these tasks concerning AI results also brings the user into the consciousness of their fallibility.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Du, X., Du, M., Zhou, Z., & Bai, Y. (2025) · International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education · doi:10.1186/s41239-025-00534-0 · Cited by 44
“The emergence of skepticism provides an opportunity for a deeper exploration of cognitive patterns in design education, especially in developing students’ systematic and rational thinking (Cwiakala, 2024).”
Metadata
- Authors
- Cwiakala, M.
- Affiliations
- University of South Carolina (US)
- Corresponding author
- Cwiakala, Martin
- Venue
- Journal of Systemics, Cybernetics and Informatics
- Published
- 2024-12
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 40-46
- ISSN
- 1690-4524 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4406100996
- Cited by
- 1
- References
- 16
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1
- FWCI
- 0.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Locations
- Journal of systemics, cybernetics, and informatics/Journal of systemics cybernetics and informatics (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Artificial Intelligence in Education
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
- Social Sciences › Education › Educational Technology in Learning
- Keywords
- artificial intelligence in education, large language models, generative AI, critical thinking, academic integrity, cheating, prompt engineering, fallibility, student awareness
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: To AI Is Human: How AI Tools with Their Imperfections Enhance Learning. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.54808/jsci.22.07.40
- The paper
- Cwiakala, M. (2024). To AI Is Human: How AI Tools with Their Imperfections Enhance Learning. Journal of Systemics, Cybernetics and Informatics. https://doi.org/10.54808/jsci.22.07.40