Cited by 3Banana Cultivation and ResearchPlant tissue culture and regenerationFlowering Plant Growth and Cultivation

Somaclonal variations induced by benzylaminopurine to enhance the fruit morphology of horn banana

Open access
SIANIPAR, N.F.·2024·SABRAO Journal of Breeding and Genetics

Abstract

N.F. SIANIPAR, K. ASSIDQI, I.G. SO, A.R. MAULIDHA, and Y. ASIKIN Citation: Sianipar NF, Assidqi K, So IG, Maulidha AR, Asikin Y (2024). Somaclonal variations induced by benzylaminopurine to enhance the fruit morphology of horn banana. SABRAO J. Breed. Genet. 56(5): 2045-2055. http://doi.org/10.54910/sabrao2024.56.5.27. Summary Banana (Musa paradisiaca) is a delicious

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.54910/sabrao2024.56.5.27

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Plant genotypes significantly influence somaclonal variation, as their susceptibility varies.

    “Notably, plant genotypes significantly influence this process, as their susceptibility to somaclonal variation varies [65,66].”

    From Somaclonal Variation and Clonal Fidelity in Commercial Micropropagation: Challenges and Perspectives (2025) · cites this paper as [66]

    The Introduction says plant genotype is among the factors affecting tissue-culture propagation and reports a somaclonal-variation rate for specific Cavendish bananas and plantains. It does not establish that genotypes differ in susceptibility to somaclonal variation or that genotype significantly influences its occurrence. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Choice of explant influences genetic stability, with meristematic tissues such as axillary buds, shoot tips, and root tips generally exhibiting higher genetic stability than differentiated tissues like leaves and stems, which are more susceptible to genetic alterations during culture.

    “Additionally, the choice of explant influences genetic stability, with meristematic tissues such as axillary buds [69], shoot tips [66], and root tips [22] generally exhibiting higher genetic stability among regenerated and donor plants compared to differentiated tissues like leaves [70] and stems [71], which are more susceptible to genetic alterations during culture.”

    From Somaclonal Variation and Clonal Fidelity in Commercial Micropropagation: Challenges and Perspectives (2025) · cites this paper as [66]

    The Introduction and Sterilization and explant initiation sections discuss banana explants and tissue-culture conditions, but do not identify shoot tips as genetically more stable. The Productivity of bananas section discusses somaclonal variation without comparing the genetic stability of meristematic and differentiated tissues. Searches for shoot tips and explant-type comparisons found no passage addressing the attributed point; page numbers were unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.72)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

The publisher hasn’t deposited this paper’s reference list.

Research works printed but not linked: 28

  1. Amoanimaa-Dede H, Su C, Yeboah A, Zhou H, Zheng D, Zhu H (2022). Growth regulators promote soybean productivity: A review. PeerJ 10: e12556. doi: 10.7717/peerj.12556. · DOI
  2. Barać G, Mastilović J, Kevrešan Ž, Milić B, Kovač R, Milović M, Kalajdžić J, Bajić A, Magazin N, Keserović Z (2022). Effects of plant growth regulators on plum (Prunus domestica L.) grown on two rootstocks at harvest and at the postharvest period. Horticulturae 8(7): 621. doi:10.3390/horticul-turae8070621. · DOI
  3. Deepthi VP (2018). Somaclonal variation in micro propagated bananas. Adv. Plant Agric. Res. 8(6):624-627. doi:10.15406/apar.2018.08.00395. · DOI
  4. Eliwa GI, El-Dengawy EF, Gawish MS, Yamany MM (2024). Comprehensive study on in vitro propagation of some imported peach rootstocks: In vitro explant surface sterilization and bud proliferation. Sci. Rep. 14: 5586. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598- 024-55685-3. FAOSTAT (2023). Crops and livestock products: Banana. Accessed Dec 12, 2023. · DOI
  5. Gan L, Song M, Wang X, Yang N, Li H, Liu X, Li Y (2022). Cytokinins are involved in regulation of tomato pericarp thickness and fruit size. Hortic. Res. 9: uhab041. https://doi.org/10.1093/hr/uhab041. · DOI
  6. SABRAO J. Breed. Genet. 18-28. http://doi.org/10.54910/sabrao2024.56.1.2. Irsyadi MB (2021). Factors that effect of the optimal plantlet growth from tissue culture on the acclimatization stage. Proc. Int. Conf. Sci. Engin. 4: 100-104. · DOI
  7. Jafari N, Othman RY, Khalid N (2011). Effect of benzylaminopurine (BAP) pulsing on in vitro shoot multiplication of Musa acuminata (banana) cv. Berangan. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 10(13): 2446-2450. doi:10.5897/ AJB10.1149. · DOI
  8. Karuwal RL, Kasiamdari R, Daryono BS (2024). Genetic variation of Fei banana (Musa troglodytarum L.) in Maluku Islands using RAPD markers. SABRAO J. Breed. Genet. 56(1): 101-111. http://doi.org/10.54910/ sabrao2024.56.1.9. Khoozani AA, Birch J, Bekhit AEA (2019). Production, application and health effects of banana pulp and peel flour in the food industry. J. Food. Sci. Technol. 56(2): 548-559. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-018-03562-z. · DOI
  9. Lestari S, Prastikawati EF, Artharina FP (2012). Pemanfaatan Pohon Pisang Untuk Meningkatkan Ekonomi Masyarakat. E- Dimas. 3(2): 17.
  10. Mangena P (2022). Evolving role of synthetic cytokinin 6-benzyl adenine for drought stress tolerance in soybean (Glycine max L. Merr.). Front. Sustain Food Syst. 6: 992581. https://doi.org/10.3389/ fsufs.2022.992581. · DOI
  11. Manurung BY, Dewi PS, Dwiati M (2021). Effect of BAP and lighting duration on banana (Musa paradisiaca cv. Raja Bulu) micropropagation. Biosaintifika 13(3): 284- 289. http://dx.doi.org/10.15294/ biosaintifika.v13i3.25173. · DOI
  12. Mekonen G, Egigu MC, Muthsuwamy M (2021). In vitro propagation of banana (Musa paradisiaca L.) plant using shoot tip explant. Turk. J. Agric. Food Sci. Technol. 9(12): 2339-2346. https://doi.org/10.24925/ turjaf.v9i12.2339-2346.2883. · DOI
  13. Monforte AJ, Diaz A, Cano-Delgado A, van-der-Knaap E (2014). The genetic basis of fruit morphology in horticultural crops: Lessons from tomato and melon. J. Exp. Bot. 65(16): 4625-4637. https://doi.org/ 10.1093/jxb/eru017. · DOI
  14. Muhie SH, Teshome AS (2023). Effects of benzylaminopurine and macro propagation techniques on multiplication of dessert banana (Musa acuminata L.). J. Agric. Food Res. 11: 100515. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.jafr.2023.100515. · DOI
  15. Nakasha JJ, Sinniah UR, Kemat N, Mallappa KS (2016). Induction, subculture cycle, and regeneration of callus in Safed musli (Chlorophytum borivilianum) using different types of phytohormones. Pharmacogn. Mag. 12(47): S460-S464. doi:10.4103/0973- 1296.191457. · DOI
  16. Poerba YS, Martanti D, Handayani T, Witjaksono (2019). Morphology and reproductive function of induced autotetraploid banana by chromosome doubling. SABRAO J. Breed. Genet. 51(2): 175-190.
  17. Ratnasari BD, Suminar E, Nuraini A, Ismail A (2016). Pengujian efektivitas berbagai jenis dan konsentrasi sitokinin terhadap multiplikasi tunas mikro pisang (Musa paradisiaca L.) secara in vitro. Kultivasi 15(2): 74-80. https://doi.org/10.24198/kultivasi.v15i2.11870. · DOI
  18. Razani M, Kayat F, Redwan RM, Susanto M (2020). Detection of abnormal banana plantlets produced by high bap concentration and number of subcultures using representational difference analysis. Int. J. Agric. Biol. 23: 541-548. https://doi.org/10.17957/IJAB/15.1321. · DOI
  19. Sadat MS, Siregar LAM, Setiado H (2018). Pengaruh IAA dan BAP terhadap induksi tunas mikro dari eksplan bonggol pisang kepok (Musa paradisiaca L.). J. Agroekoteknologi FP USU. 6(1):107-112.
  20. Setyowati M, Efendi, Alfizar, Kesumawati E (2022). Optimization of benzyl amino purines (BAP) concentration and medium type on the induction of banana shoots (Musa acuminata Colla.) cv. Barangan Merah under in vitro condition. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 951(1): 012015. https://doi.org/10.1088/ 1755-1315/951/1/012015. · DOI
  21. Sharma H (2018). Use of BAP in tissue culture of medicinal plants -a review. Ann. Biol. 34(3): 270-274.
  22. Sharma S, Sharma N, Sharma D, Chauhan N (2018). Effect of plant growth regulators on fruit set, yield efficiency, fruit size and russet formation in apple cv. Scarlet Spur II. Int. J. Pure Appl. Biosci. 6(3): 692-698.
  23. Sianipar NF, Assidqi K, Abbas BS (2020). The effects of subculture on the mutant plant regeneration of rodent tuber (Typhonium flagelliforme) in vitro mutagenesis using gamma-ray irradiation. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 426(1): 012180. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/426/ 1/012180. · DOI
  24. Sianipar NF, Laurent D, Chelen, Rosaria, Tanty H (2015). Induction, multiplication, and acclimatization of rodent tuber (Typhonium flagelliforme Lodd.) plant from Indonesia by in vitro organogenesis. 2015 Int. Conf. Technol., Inform., Manag. Engin. Environ. (TIME-E) 59-63, doi: 10.1109/TIME- E.2015.7389748. · DOI
  25. Sianipar NF, Vidianty M, Chelen, Abbas BS (2017). Micropropagation of rodent tuber plant (Typhonium flagelliforme Lodd.) from Medan by organogenesis. Pertanika J. Trop. Agric. Sci. 40(4): 471-484.
  26. Silva JAT, Hossain MM, Sharma M, Dobránszki J, Cardoso JC, Zeng S (2017). Acclimatization of in vitro-derived Dendrobium. Hortic. Plant J. 3(3): 110-124. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.hpj.2017.07.009. · DOI
  27. Sipen P, Davey MR (2012). Effects of n(6)- benzylaminopurine and indole acetic acid on in vitro shoot multiplication, nodule-like meristem proliferation and plant regeneration of Malaysian bananas (Musa spp.). Trop. Life Sci. Res. 23(2): 67-80.
  28. Unsong N, Tilaar W, Sumayku BRA (2022). Sterilisasi dan penggunaan zat pengatur tumbuh bap (benzile amino purin) terhadap pertumbuhan eksplan tunas pisang abaka (Musa textilis Nee) melalui teknik in vitro. Agri-Sosioekonomi 18(3): 717-724. https://doi.org/10.35791/agrsosek.v18i3.44 707. Wu W, Du K, Kang X, Wei H (2021). The diverse roles of cytokinins in regulating leaf development. Hortic. Res. 8: 118. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41438-021-00558-3. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
SIANIPAR, N. F.
Affiliations
Binus University (ID)
Corresponding author
SIANIPAR, N.F.
Venue
SABRAO Journal of Breeding and Genetics
Published
2024-10-31
Volume
56
Issue
5
Pages
2045-2055
ISSN
  • 1029-7073 (ISSN-L)
  • 2224-8978
OpenAlex
W4404078305
Cited by
3
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 3
FWCI
0.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
SABRAO Journal of Breeding and Genetics (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Banana Cultivation and Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Plant tissue culture and regeneration
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Flowering Plant Growth and Cultivation
Keywords
somaclonal variation, benzylaminopurine, Musa paradisiaca, fruit morphology, plant growth regulators, banana breeding

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review