The Comparison of M-B CDI-K Short Form and K-ASQ as Screening Test for Language Development
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the usefulness of the communication domain in the Korean version of Ages and Stages Questionnaire (K-ASQ), and short form of the Korean version of MacArthur-Bates Communicative Development Inventories (M-B CDI-K), as screening tests for language developmental delay. METHODS: Data was collected between April 2010 and December 2013, from children who visited either the Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation or the Developmental Delay Clinic, presenting with language development delay as their chief complaint. All the children took the short form of M-B CDI-K and K-ASQ as screening tests, and received diagnostic language assessments including Sequenced Language Scale for Infants (SELSI) or Preschool Receptive-Expressive Language Scale (PRES). RESULTS: A total of 206 children, mean age 29.7 months, were enrolled. The final diagnoses were developmental language disorder, global developmental delay, autism spectrum disorder, cerebral palsy, etc. The M-B CDI-K short form and the communication domain of the K-ASQ had 95.9% and 76.7% sensitivity, and 82.4% and 85.3% specificity, with regards to diagnostic language assessments. The M-B CDI-K short form showed higher negative predictive value and better accuracy than the communication domain of the K-ASQ. CONCLUSION: The screening ability of K-ASQ was not sufficient for children with language development delay, and the M-B CDI-K short form should be implemented for additional screening.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The Korean integral version of the Ages and Stages Questionnaire (K-ASQ) is valid as a screening tool for mixed developmental disorders and, to a lesser degree, for isolated DLD.
“The study by Kim et al. [84], on a population of Korean children with a mean age of 29.7 months, highlighted the validity of the Korean integral version of the Ages and Stages Questionnaire (K-ASQ Questionnaire; [127]) as a screening tool for mixed developmental disorders and—to a lesser degree—for isolated DLD.”
From Developmental Language Disorder: Early Predictors, Age for the Diagnosis, and Diagnostic Tools. A Scoping Review (2021) · cites this paper as [84]
The K-ASQ appears to be a good screening tool, but because its communication domain has six items exploring receptive and expressive linguistic skills, it is not possible to discriminate which item the sensitivity of the scale is related to.
“The K-ASQ test appears to be a good screening tool but, since the communication domain is composed of six different items exploring the children’s receptive and expressive linguistic skills, it is not possible to discriminate to which item the sensitivity of the scale is related, thus failing to provide crucial information for the question under consideration.”
From Developmental Language Disorder: Early Predictors, Age for the Diagnosis, and Diagnostic Tools. A Scoping Review (2021) · cites this paper as [84]
Questionnaires proposed to parents were found reliable and valid instruments as a first step to assess communication abilities in Korean children of an average age of 29;7 months, below 35 months.
“(c) communication abilities in Korean children of an average age of 29;7 months, below 35 months [84].”
From Developmental Language Disorder: Early Predictors, Age for the Diagnosis, and Diagnostic Tools. A Scoping Review (2021) · cites this paper as [84]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Trends in the prevalence of developmental disabilities in US children, 1997-2008
Boyle, C. A., Boulet, S., Schieve, L. A., Cohen, R. A., Blumberg, S. J., Yeargin-Allsopp, M., Visser, S., & Kogan, M. D. (2011) · Pediatrics · doi:10.1542/peds.2010-2989 · Cited by 1,732 · see citing works
Shevell, M. I., Majnemer, A., Platt, R. W., et al. (2005) · Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology · doi:10.1017/s0012162205001386 · Cited by 67 · see citing works
Burden, V., Stott, C., Forge, J., & Goodyer, L. (1996) · Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8749.1996.tb12126.x · Cited by 60 · see citing works
Guiberson, M., Rodríguez, B. L., & Dale, P. S. (2011) · Language Speech and Hearing Services in Schools · doi:10.1044/0161-1461(2011/10-0076 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
A Study of Language Development in a Sample of 3 year old Children
Randall, D., Reynell, J. K., & Curwen, M. P. (1974) · International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders · doi:10.3109/13682827409011603 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
Harel, S., Greenstein, Y., Kramer, U., Yifat, R., Samuel, E., Nevo, Y., Leitner, Y., Kutai, M., Fattal, A., & Shinnar, S. (1996) · Pediatric Neurology · doi:10.1016/s0887-8994(96)00222-6 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
The CAT/CLAMS Assessment for Early Intervention Services
Rossman, M. J., Hyman, S. L., Rorabaugh, M. L., et al. (1994) · Clinical Pediatrics · doi:10.1177/000992289403300705 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
Ga, H.-Y., & Kwon, J. Y. (2011) · Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine · doi:10.5535/arm.2011.35.3.369 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Guiberson, M., & Rodríguez, B. L. (2010) · American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology · doi:10.1044/1058-0360(2010/09-0058 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Berkman, N. D., Wallace, I., Watson, L. R., Coyne-Beasley, T. D., Cullen, K., Wood, C. L., & Lohr, K. N. (2015) · Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US) eBooks · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Standardization of the Capute Scales: Methods and Results
VISINTAINER, P. F., Leppert, M. L. O., Bennett, A., et al. (2004) · Journal of Child Neurology · doi:10.1177/08830738040190121101 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Kim, E. Y., & Sung, I. K. (2007) · Korean Journal of Pediatrics · doi:10.3345/kjp.2007.50.11.1061 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Kim, S. W., Jeon, H. R., Park, E. J., et al. (2014) · Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine · doi:10.5535/arm.2014.38.3.376 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Self-citationDevelopmental profiles of preschool children with delayed language development
Eun, J. J., Lee, H. J., & Kim, J. K. (2014) · Korean Journal of Pediatrics · doi:10.3345/kjp.2014.57.8.363 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Self-citationWhy Screening Canadian Preschoolers for Language Delays Is More Difficult Than It Should Be
Frisk, V. A., Montgomery, L., Boychyn, E., Young, R., vanRyn, E., McLachlan, D., & Neufeld, J. (2009) · Infants & Young Children · doi:10.1097/iyc.0b013e3181bc4db6 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
The Validity of Korean Ages and Stages Questionnaires (K-ASQ) in Korean Infants and Children
정희정, 김현식, 김진경, et al. (2014) · Annals of Child Neurology · doi:10.26815/jkcns.2014.22.1.1 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Validity and Reliability of the Korean Adaptation of MCDI
Pae, S. (2003) · Eon'eo cheong'gag jang'ae yeon'gu/Communication sciences & disorders · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Short Form Versions of MacArthur-Bates Communicative Development Inventories - Korean (M-B CDI-K)
Pae, S., Kwak, K., Kim, M.-B., et al. (2008) · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Neurodevelopmental Disorders of Children Screened by The Infantile Health Promotion System
Kim, S. W., Han, Z., Jeon, H. R., et al. (2011) · Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine · doi:10.5535/arm.2011.35.6.867 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Self-citationJang, J. H., Park, E. S., Park, J., et al. (2010) · Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Pae, S., Yoon, H., Gilkerson, J., et al. (2015) · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Sansavini, A., Favilla, M. E., Guasti, M. T., Marini, A., Millepiedi, S., Di Martino, M. V., Vecchi, S., Battajon, N., Bertolo, L., Capirci, O., et al. (2021) · Brain Sciences · doi:10.3390/brainsci11050654 · Cited by 207 · see citing works
- Authors
- Kim, S. W., Kim, J. Y., Lee, S. Y., & Jeon, H. R.
- Affiliations
- National Health Insurance Service Ilsan Hospital (KR)
- Corresponding author
- Jeon, Ha Ra
- Venue
- Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine
- Published
- 2016
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1108
- ISSN
- 2234-0645 (ISSN-L)
- 2234-0653
- PMC
- PMC5256322
- OpenAlex
- W2576033372
- Cited by
- 18
- References
- 21
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1
- FWCI
- 0.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Language Development and Disorders
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Developmental and Educational Neuropsychology
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility
- Keywords
- language delay, language screening, MacArthur-Bates Communicative Development Inventory, Ages and Stages Questionnaire, communication domain, specific language impairment, autism spectrum disorder, cerebral palsy, global developmental delay, screening sensitivity and specificity, Korean children
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
