Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 45Problem and Project Based LearningScience Education and PedagogySTEM Education

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Teacher and Student Questions: A Case Study in Malaysian Secondary School Problem-Based Learning

Open access
Yin Peen, Tan, Yusof Arshad, Mohammad·2014·Asian Social Science

Abstract

Problem-based learning (PBL) promotes high order questioning and stimulates student thinking, thus playing an important role in preparing students to face real-world challenges. Yet, PBL is an uncommon instructional strategy in Malaysian secondary school science classrooms. Occurrence of questioning in the traditional spoon-feeding classroom is low. Thus, the PBL model adapted from Barrows has been introduced. This article investigates whether PBL is able to promote high order questioning and thinking in the Malaysian science classroom. A PBL class with 1 teacher and 17 students divided into 4 groups was observed, video-and audio-recorded, and the verbatim were analysed. Questions are categorized into high order, low order, eliciting ideas, and evaluating ideas questions. Findings show that the percentage of student questions is 67.9% while for teacher questions is 32.1%. The amount of student questions per hour is relatively high at 8.2 questions per student. Nearly half of the classroom questions are low order questions (47.9%), such as clarification, verification, concept completion, disjunctive, definition, example, quantification, and feature specification questions. High order questions consist of 16.3%, which include causal antecedent, causal consequence, goal orientation, comparison, enablement, and reflective questions. Eliciting ideas questions raised by the teacher cover 8.8% while evaluating ideas questions by students cover 27.1%. This study shows that the PBL environment promotes active learning, student thinking, and questioning in the Malaysian science classroom. However, student and teacher questions should be enhanced to be at higher order level. Several suggestions to extend low order questions into high order questions are discussed in this paper.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5539/ass.v10n4p174

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 18

  1. Albanese, M. A., & Mitchell, S. (1993). Problem-Based Learning: A Review of Literature on Its Outcomes and Implementation Issues. Academic Medicine, 68(1), 52-81. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00001888-199301000-00012 · DOI
  2. Bilgin, I., Senocak, E., & Sözbilir, M. (2009). The effects of problem-based learning instruction on university students' performance of conceptual and qualitative problems in gas concepts. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 5(2), 153-164. Retrieved from http://www.ejmste.com
  3. Dochy, F., Segers, M., Van den Bossche, P., & Gijbels, D. (2003). Effects of problem-based learning: A meta-analysis. Learning and Instruction, 13(5), 533-568. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0959-4752(02)00025-7 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Faaizah, S., & Halimah, B. Z. (2007, November 13-16). C2HADAM: Hybrid PBL multimedia and web based courseware for science. Paper presented at the International Conference on Science & Mathematics Education (CoSMEd) 2007, SEAMEO RECSAM, Penang, Malaysia.
  5. Graesser, A. C., & Person, N. K. (1994). Question asking during tutoring. American Educational Research Journal, 31(1), 104-137. http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/00028312031001104 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Hmelo-Silver, C. E., & Barrows, H. S. (2008). Facilitating collaborative knowledge building. Cognition and Instruction, 26(1), 48-94. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07370000701798495 · DOI
  7. Hung, W., Jonassen, D. H., & Liu, R. (2008). Problem-based learning. In J. M. Spector, J. G. van, M. M. D. Merriënboer, & M. Driscoll (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology (pp. 485-506). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  8. Lim, C. S., Fatimah, S., & Tan, S. K. (2002). Cultural influences in teaching and learning of mathematics: Methodological challenges and constraints. In D. Edge, & B. H. Yeap (Eds.), Mathematics education for a knowledge-based era (Vol. 1, pp. 138-149). Paper presented at the Second East Asia Regional Conference on Mathematics Education and Ninth Southeast Asian Conference on Mathematics Education, National Institute of Education, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, 27-31 May (Vol. 1, pp. 138-149). Singapore: Association of Mathematics Educators.
  9. Lim, T. C. (2007). Hubungan antara pendekatan pengajaran guru dengan pendekatan pembelajaran pelajar mata pelajaran kimia tingkatan empat (The relationship between teachers' instructional approach and students' learning approach of form four chemistry subject). (Unpublished master's thesis). Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Johor Bahru, Malaysia.
  10. Newman, M. (2003). A pilot systematic review and meta-analysis on the effectiveness of problem-based learning. Newcastle, UK: Learning & Teaching Subject Network for Medicine, Dentistry and Veterinary Medicine, Middlesex University.
  11. Norman, G. R., & Schmidt, H. G. (1992). The psychological basis of problem-based learning: A review of the evidence. Academic Medicine, 67(9), 557-565. Retrieved from http://journals.lww.com/academicmedicine/pages/default.aspx http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00001888-199209000-00002 · DOI
  12. Maimunah, S. Z. (2000). Current trends and main concerns as regards science curriculum development and implementation in selected states in Asia: Malaysia. In M. Poisson (Ed.), Science education for contemporary society: Problems, issues and dilemmas. Final report of the international workshop on the reform in the teaching of science and technology at primary and secondary level in Asia: Comparative references to Europe. Paper presented at the International Workshop on the Reform in the Teaching of Science and Technology at Primary and Secondary Level in Asia: Comparative References to Europe, Beijing, China, 27-31 March (pp. 39-45). Switzerland: International Bureau of Education.
  13. Tan, Y. P., & Arshad, M. Y. (2011). Problem-based learning: Implementation issues in Malaysia secondary schools science classroom. Paper presented at the International Conference on Science & Mathematics Education (CoSMEd) 2011, SEAMEO RECSAM, Penang, Malaysia.
  14. Tan, Y. P., & Arshad, M. Y. (2013). FILA-MMS chart in chemistry PBL lesson: A case study of its implementation during problem analysis. Paper presented at the International Research Symposium on Problem-Based Learning, Putrajaya.
  15. Vernon, D. T., & Blake, R. L. (1993). Does problem-based learning work? A meta-analysis of evaluative research. Academic Medicine, 68(7), 550-563. Retrieved from http://journals.lww.com/academicmedicine/pages/default.aspx http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00001888-199307000-00015 · DOI · Paper page
  16. Zamri, M., & Lim, N. R. (2011). Kepelbagaian kaedah penyoalan lisan dalam pengajaran guru bahasa melayu: Kaedah pemerhatian (Variety of oral questioning methods in teaching Malay language: observation method). Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Melayu; Malay Language Education (MyLEJ), 1(1), 51-65.
  17. Zhang, M., Lundeberg, M., & Eberhardt, J. (2011). Strategic facilitation of problem-based discussion for teacher professional development. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 20(3), 342-394. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2011.553258 · DOI
  18. Zhang, M., Lundeberg, M., McConnell, T. J., Koehler, M. J., & Eberhardt, J. (2010). Using questioning to facilitate discussion of science teaching problems in teacher professional development. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-based Learning, 4(1), 5. http://dx.doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1097 · DOI

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Yin Peen, T., & Yusof Arshad, M.
Venue
Asian Social Science
Published
2014-01-26
Volume
10
Issue
4
ISSN
  • 1911-2017 (ISSN-L)
  • 1911-2025
OpenAlex
W1984890370
Cited by
45
References
1
Citations by year
2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 5
FWCI
23.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
Asian Social Science (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Problem and Project Based Learning
  • Social Sciences › Education › Science Education and Pedagogy
  • Social Sciences › Education › STEM Education
Keywords
problem-based learning, classroom questioning, student questions, teacher questions, science education, secondary school science, active learning, Malaysian secondary schools

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review