CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 100Educational Assessment and PedagogyEFL/ESL Teaching and LearningArabic Language Education Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 32 of the 37 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Using Bloom’s Taxonomy to Evaluate the Cognitive Levels of Master Class Textbook’s Questions

Open access
R. Assaly, Ibtihal, M. Smadi, Oqlah·2015·English Language Teaching
DOI 10.5539/elt.v8n5p100
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

This study aimed at evaluating the cognitive levels of the questions following the reading texts of Master Class textbook. A checklist based on Bloom’s Taxonomy was the instrument used to categorize the cognitive levels of these questions. The researchers used proper statistics to rank the cognitive levels of the comprehension questions. The results showed that the author of Master Class emphasized the cognitive level of Comprehension having 52% of the questions, which was much more than the expected frequency, while wrote only 3.7% and 6% of the questions on the cognitive levels of Knowledge and Application respectively. The frequency of questions on the cognitive levels of Evaluation and Analysis were much closer to the expected frequencies. The results indicated that about 40% of the textbook’s questions emphasized higher-order thinking skills, which goes with the requirements of the revised curriculum. Evaluating and choosing a good textbook that goes with the goals of the curriculum is recommended. Such a study would shed light upon the role of textbooks in developing cognitive skills among Arab students.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5539/elt.v8n5p100

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 100

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
R. Assaly, I., & M. Smadi, O.
Venue
English Language Teaching
Publisher
Canadian Center of Science and Education
Published
2015-04-23
Volume
8
Issue
5
ISSN
  • 1916-4742 (ISSN-L)
  • 1916-4750
DOI
10.5539/elt.v8n5p100
OpenAlex
W1964405501
Cited by
92
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2
FWCI
15.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
English Language Teaching (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Educational Assessment and Pedagogy
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
  • Social Sciences › Education › Arabic Language Education Studies
Keywords
Bloom's taxonomy, cognitive levels, textbook question analysis, English as a foreign language, higher-order thinking skills, reading comprehension questions, textbook evaluation, revised curriculum, Arab students

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review