The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Development of University Students’ Self-Sufficiency Based on Interactive Technologies by Their Immersion in the Professional Activity
Open accessAbstract
The article discusses the problems of using web technologies in the development of self-sufficiency of University students. We hypothesize that real professional situations in which he/she is obliged to work independently on the basis of web technologies contribute to the development of students’ self-sufficiency. It is shown that the activity approach to learning, based on the use of project learning technologies in the process of preparing for lessons by learners and interactive technologies of blended learning, promotes the development of independence and self-reliance of students on the basis of web technologies. This article contains a matrix of integration of interactive technologies in the process of independent work of students. This will allow the teacher to select the tools for Moodle Leaning Management System in order to successfully implement the interactive forms and education methods in independent work of students in the conditions of turning down the monologue-based oral presentation of training material by the teacher. For assessment of the effectiveness results of research we carried out a survey of Bachelors of pedagogical education. The article presents the results of the survey of four-year students confirming the results of the study.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Of the identified articles, 3% investigated learning styles—namely, Active vs Reflective, Sensitive vs Intuitive, Visual vs Verbal, Sequential vs Global—when implementing e-course content (Kouis et al., 2020; Ljubimova et al., 2015; Xiao & Rahman, 2017).”
From A systematic review on trends in using Moodle for teaching and learning (2022) · cites this paper as Ljubimova et al., 2015
In the citing paper
“While some studies have proposed automatic detection of learning styles by analysing student's learning behaviour through mathematical models (Xiao & Rahman, 2017), other studies have developed simpler matrix systems that would allow the teacher to carry out a manual selection of tools for Moodle Learning after considering student's learning styles (Ljubimova et al., 2015; Meza-Fernández & Sepúl”
From A systematic review on trends in using Moodle for teaching and learning (2022) · cites this paper as Ljubimova et al., 2015
Citations
Cites
Still being checked.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A systematic review on trends in using Moodle for teaching and learning
Gamage, S. H. P. W., Ayres, J. R., & Behrend, M. B. (2022) · International Journal of STEM Education · doi:10.1186/s40594-021-00323-x · Cited by 360
Metadata
- Authors
- Ljubimova, E. M., Galimullina, E. Z., & Ibatullin, R. R.
- Affiliations
- Kazan Federal University (RU)
- Venue
- International Education Studies
- Published
- 2015-03-30
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 4
- ISSN
- 1913-9020 (ISSN-L)
- 1913-9039
- OpenAlex
- W2151311517
- Cited by
- 16
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2
- FWCI
- 4.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- International Education Studies (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Educational Technology and E-Learning
- Social Sciences › Education › Online and Blended Learning
- Social Sciences › Education › Innovations in Education and Learning Technologies
- Keywords
- self-sufficiency, university students, web technologies, interactive technologies, blended learning, project-based learning, independent student work, Moodle, pedagogy students, student independence
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Development of University Students’ Self-Sufficiency Based on Interactive Technologies by Their Immersion in the Professional Activity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5539/ies.v8n4p192
- The paper
- Ljubimova, E. M., Galimullina, E. Z., & Ibatullin, R. R. (2015). The Development of University Students’ Self-Sufficiency Based on Interactive Technologies by Their Immersion in the Professional Activity. International Education Studies. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v8n4p192