The DOI matches its Crossref record; 14 of the 14 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Development of Reflective Undergraduate Students: Assessing the Educational Benefits of Reflective Learning Logs in Entrepreneurship Module
Open accessAbstract
The objective of this paper is to analyze written reflections on learning log of among the third and final year students undertaking an entrepreneurship module. Data was collected in the form of written reflection taken from the learning log of 140 students from 3 classes. At the end of the collection only 136 students’ responses were managed to be collected given 4 students failed to hand in the learning log. A thematic approach was utilized to present the reflections of the students and all data was recorded in a verbatim format. Findings show that most students have never written a reflective log or essay in the formative assessment. As a consequence, they had difficulty in writing the reflection when being requested to do so. This has resulted in their reflection being written descriptively which lacks in critical analysis and deep thinking. The results of this investigation have strongly suggested the need to urgently develop among the students the skills in writing reflectively as they go through the process of higher education which be useful in molding their future professional and entrepreneurial behavior as when they entered the job market which requires a critical reasoning ability. The limitation and future were discussed.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“However, many undergraduate students, especially those in technical programs, struggle to move beyond descriptive reporting toward critical analysis of their assumptions and decision-making.”
From Enhancing Student Success through AI-Assisted Reflective Learning in Entrepreneurship Education: An Empirical Study (2026) · cites this paper as Kheng & June, 2015
Citations
Cites
Vygotsky, L. S. (1964) · Bulletin of the Orton Society · doi:10.1007/bf02928399 · Cited by 20,704
Dewey, J. (1986) · The Educational Forum · doi:10.1080/00131728609335764 · Cited by 13,432
Teaching For Quality Learning At University
BIGGS, J. B., & Tang, C. S. (1999) · Cited by 7,559
DEWEY, J. M. (1910) · Cited by 6,801
Working with Emotional Intelligence
Goleman, D. (1999) · ETC: A Review of General Semantics · doi:10.66774/etc_5601_103 · Cited by 6,254
The Moral Judgment Of The Child
Piaget, J. (2013) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781315009681 · Cited by 4,372
Dewey, J. (1910) · D C Heath eBooks · doi:10.1037/10903-000 · Cited by 3,998
Reflection in Learning and Professional Development: Theory and Practice
Moon, J. A. (2005) · Cited by 1,475
Schön, D. A. (1971) · DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library) · Cited by 1,308
On Becoming An Innovative University Teacher: Reflection In Action
Cowan, J. (2006) · Cited by 301
Cited by
Enhancing graduate prospects by recording and reflecting on part-time work
Evans, C., & Richardson, M. (2017) · Industry and Higher Education · doi:10.1177/0950422217715200 · Cited by 15
Solomon, G. E., & Maistry, S. M. (2025) · South African Journal of Education · doi:10.15700/saje.v45n4a2726 · Cited by 1
Tran, L. K., Nguyen, L. T., & Pham, K. M. (2026) · Student Success · doi:10.63608/ssj.4067
Engaging Summer School Programme’s Participants in Reflective Learning
Kahar, R., Samad, A. A., Bunari, G., Yusof, M. A. M., Omar, N. A. M., & Raof, A. H. A. (2017) · Sains Humanika · doi:10.11113/sh.v9n4-2.1363
Metadata
- Authors
- Kheng, Y. K., & June, S.
- Affiliations
- Universiti Utara Malaysia (MY)
- SENTRAL College Penang (MY)
- ORCID
- Kheng, Yeoh Khar
- Venue
- International Education Studies
- Published
- 2015-08-26
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 9
- ISSN
- 1913-9020 (ISSN-L)
- 1913-9039
- OpenAlex
- W1895430497
- Cited by
- 3
- References
- 14
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2017: 2
- FWCI
- 3.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- International Education Studies (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Reflective Practices in Education
- Social Sciences › Education › Student Assessment and Feedback
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
- Keywords
- reflective writing, entrepreneurship education, undergraduate students, reflective practice, critical thinking, formative assessment, entrepreneurial behavior
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
