Cited by 23Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychometric Methodologies and TestingHealth Education and Validation

Factor structure of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale in adolescent patients with chronic disease

Open access
Selene Valero‐Moreno, Laura Lacomba‐Trejo, Sara Casaña-Granell, Vicente Prado‐Gascó, Inmaculada Montoya‐Castilla, Marián Pérez‐Marín·2019·Archivos Argentinos de Pediatria

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) is a screening instrument that assesses emotional symptoms in different populations and medical conditions. This study analyzes the psychometric properties and factor structure of the HADS in adolescents with chronic disease and the differences based on their medical condition. METHOD: The HADS was administered to a sample of 302 adolescents with chronic disease. Exploratory factor analyses were done in a subsample of 100 adolescents, while confirmatory factor analyses were performed in the rest of participants (202) to examine the validity and reliability of the HADS (14 items); an analysis of variance for a single factor was also done to study differences among diseases. RESULTS: Patients were aged 12-16 years, with a similar sex ratio; 43 % had respiratory diseases and 47 %, endocrine disorders. The original two-factor structure (anxiety and depression) showed adequate fit indices and incorporated a second-order factor (emotional distress). Three of the original items were removed, thus obtaining a new 11-item version. This showed adequate psychometric properties, and differences were observed between patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus and those with respiratory disease, but not in terms of short stature, in the depression factor. CONCLUSIONS: The HADS displays an adequate reliability and validity in pediatric patients with chronic disease and is useful for the early detection of anxiety and depression in the health care setting.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5546/aap.2019.eng.252

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Valero‐Moreno, S., Lacomba‐Trejo, L., Casaña-Granell, S., Prado‐Gascó, V., Montoya‐Castilla, I., & Pérez‐Marín, M.
Affiliations
Universitat de València (ES)
Venue
Archivos Argentinos de Pediatria
Published
2019-08-01
Volume
117
Issue
4
Pages
252-258
ISSN
0325-0075 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2982633909
Cited by
23
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4
FWCI
3.24
Type
journal article
Language
es
Open access
Locations
  • Archivos Argentinos de Pediatria (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Repository of Digital Objects for Teaching Research and Culture (University of Valencia) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
Universitat de València
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Education › Health Education and Validation
Keywords
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, factor structure, adolescents, chronic disease, anxiety, depression, emotional distress, psychometric properties, type 1 diabetes, respiratory diseases, endocrine disorders, short stature, screening tool, pediatric patients
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Anxiety, Child, Chronic Disease, Cross-Sectional Studies, Depression, Factor Analysis, Statistical, Female, Hospitalization, Humans, Male, Psychometrics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review