Cited by 413Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesMental Health Treatment and AccessPsychometric Methodologies and Testing

Normative values for the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) in the general German population

Hinz, Andreas, Brähler, Elmar·2011·Journal of Psychosomatic Research

Abstract

Objective The aim of this study was to present normative values for the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS).Methods A representative sample of the German general population (N=4410) was tested with the HADS.Results Females are more anxious than males, and older subjects are more depressed than younger subjects. The mean scores for anxiety / depression are 4.4 / 4.8 (males) and 5.0 / 4.7 (females). Using the cut-off 8+, the percentages of elevated anxiety and depression in the total sample are 21 % and 23 %, respectively. Regression analyses proved a linear but not a curvilinear age trend of anxiety and depression. Percentile rank norms are given for anxiety, depression, and the HADS total score.Conclusion The regression coefficients allow the calculation of expected mean scores for each age and gender distribution of any sample of patients. HADS mean scores are better suited to describe the degree of anxiety and depression in patient samples compared to percentages of subjects with elevated values.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2011.01.005

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hinz, A., & Brähler, E.
Affiliations
Leipzig University (DE)
Corresponding author
Hinz, Andreas
Venue
Journal of Psychosomatic Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-08
Volume
71
Issue
2
Pages
74-78
ISSN
0022-3999 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1985540648
Cited by
413
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 37 · 2024: 46 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 36 · 2021: 44 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 25 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 27 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 13
FWCI
21.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Psychosomatic Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
Keywords
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, reference values, anxiety, depression, German general population, age differences, gender differences, percentile norms, cut-off values, prevalence of anxiety and depression
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Age Factors, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Anxiety, Depression, Female, Germany, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Reference Values, Sex Factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review