Cited by 57Energy, Environment, and Transportation PoliciesEnergy, Environment, Economic GrowthRenewable energy and sustainable power systems

International Evidence on Sectoral Interfuel Substitution

Serletis, Apostolos, Timilsina, Govinda R., Vasetsky, Olexandr·2010·The Energy Journal

Abstract

This paper estimates interfuel substitution elasticities in selected developing and industrialized economies at the sector level. In doing so, it employs state-of-the-art techniques in microeconometrics, particularly the locally flexible normalized quadratic functional form, and provides evidence consistent with neoclassical microeconomic theory. The results indicate that the interfuel substitution elasticities are consistently below unity, revealing the limited ability to substitute between major energy commodities (i.e., coal, oil, gas, and electricity). We find that on average, industrial and residential sectors tend to exhibit higher potential for substitution between energy inputs as compared to the electricity generation and transportation sectors in all countries, with the United States being the only exception. In addition, we find that developed countries demonstrate higher potential for interfuel substitution in their industrial and transportation sectors as compared to the developing economies. The implication is that interfuel substitution depends on the structure of the economy, not the level of economic development. Moreover, higher changes in relative prices are needed than what we have already experienced to induce switching toward a lower carbon economy.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5547/issn0195-6574-ej-vol31-no4-1

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Other recent studies relying on alternative structural models have obtained similarly large oil demand elasticity estimates ranging from -0.35 to -0.41.

    “Another way of putting these results into perspective is to observe that other recent studies relying on alternative structural models have obtained similarly large oil demand elasticity estimates ranging from À0.35 to À0.41 (see, for example, Serletis et al., 2010; Bodenstein and Guerrieri, 2012; Baumeister and Peersman, 2013).”

    From THE ROLE OF INVENTORIES AND SPECULATIVE TRADING IN THE GLOBAL MARKET FOR CRUDE OIL (2014) · cites this paper as Serletis et al., 2010

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Serletis, A., Timilsina, G. R., & Vasetsky, O.
Affiliations
World Bank (US)
Venue
The Energy Journal
Published
2010-10
Volume
31
Issue
4
Pages
1-30
ISSN
  • 0195-6574 (ISSN-L)
  • 1944-9089
OpenAlex
W2057336122
Cited by
57
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 6
FWCI
2.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Energy Journal (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Energy, Environment, and Transportation Policies
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Renewable energy and sustainable power systems
Keywords
interfuel substitution, energy demand, manufacturing industry, residential sector, transport sector, electricity generation sector, relative prices, CO2 emissions, economic structure, developing countries, developed countries

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review