International Evidence on Sectoral Interfuel Substitution
Abstract
This paper estimates interfuel substitution elasticities in selected developing and industrialized economies at the sector level. In doing so, it employs state-of-the-art techniques in microeconometrics, particularly the locally flexible normalized quadratic functional form, and provides evidence consistent with neoclassical microeconomic theory. The results indicate that the interfuel substitution elasticities are consistently below unity, revealing the limited ability to substitute between major energy commodities (i.e., coal, oil, gas, and electricity). We find that on average, industrial and residential sectors tend to exhibit higher potential for substitution between energy inputs as compared to the electricity generation and transportation sectors in all countries, with the United States being the only exception. In addition, we find that developed countries demonstrate higher potential for interfuel substitution in their industrial and transportation sectors as compared to the developing economies. The implication is that interfuel substitution depends on the structure of the economy, not the level of economic development. Moreover, higher changes in relative prices are needed than what we have already experienced to induce switching toward a lower carbon economy.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Other recent studies relying on alternative structural models have obtained similarly large oil demand elasticity estimates ranging from -0.35 to -0.41.
“Another way of putting these results into perspective is to observe that other recent studies relying on alternative structural models have obtained similarly large oil demand elasticity estimates ranging from À0.35 to À0.41 (see, for example, Serletis et al., 2010; Bodenstein and Guerrieri, 2012; Baumeister and Peersman, 2013).”
From THE ROLE OF INVENTORIES AND SPECULATIVE TRADING IN THE GLOBAL MARKET FOR CRUDE OIL (2014) · cites this paper as Serletis et al., 2010
Cited by
Sorted by citations
THE ROLE OF INVENTORIES AND SPECULATIVE TRADING IN THE GLOBAL MARKET FOR CRUDE OIL
Kilian, L., & Murphy, D. P. (2014) · Journal of Applied Econometrics · doi:10.1002/jae.2322 · Cited by 1,481 · see citing works
The Role of Speculation in Oil Markets: What Have We Learned So Far?
Fattouh, B., Kilian, L., & Mahadeva, L. (2013) · The Energy Journal · doi:10.5547/01956574.34.3.2 · Cited by 491 · see citing works
- Authors
- Serletis, A., Timilsina, G. R., & Vasetsky, O.
- Affiliations
- World Bank (US)
- Venue
- The Energy Journal
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2010-10
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1-30
- ISSN
- 0195-6574 (ISSN-L)
- 1944-9089
- OpenAlex
- W2057336122
- Cited by
- 57
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 2.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The Energy Journal (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Energy, Environment, and Transportation Policies
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
- Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Renewable energy and sustainable power systems
- Keywords
- interfuel substitution, energy demand, manufacturing industry, residential sector, transport sector, electricity generation sector, relative prices, CO2 emissions, economic structure, developing countries, developed countries
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review