Expounding the Place of Legal Doctrinal Methods in Legal-Interdisciplinary Research: Experiences with Studying the Practice of Independent Accountability Mechanisms at Multilateral Development Banks
Open accessAbstract
Expounding the Place of Legal Doctrinal Methods in Legal-Interdisciplinary Research There is a distinct place for legal doctrinal methods in legal-interdisciplinary research methodologies, but there is value to be had in expounding that place – in developing a deeper understanding, for instance, of what legal doctrinal analysis has to offer, wherein lies its limitations, and how it could work in concert with methods and theories from disciplinary areas other than law. This article offers such perspectives, based on experiences with an ‘advanced’ legal-interdisciplinary methodology, which facilitates a long-term study of the growing body of practice generated by citizen-driven, independent accountability mechanisms (IAMs) that are institutionally affiliated with multilateral development banks. The article demonstrates how legal doctrinal methods have contributed towards the design and development of a multipurpose IAM-practice database. This database constitutes the analytical platform of the research project and also facilitates the integration of various types of research questions, methods and theories.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
0 of 24 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
- Findingreasoning
The team could identify a potential data entry using legal doctrinal analysis even when the entry's meaning or issue-code was initially unclear.
“the team could identify a potential data entry by employing legal doctrinal analysis, even as it was not immediately clear what the data entry signified, or with which issuecode(s) the data entry should be configured within the database.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
By using legal doctrinal methods with other tools, the project identified various forms of normative development.
“Finally, by employing legal doctrinal methods in concert with other conceptual and analytical tools, the project identified various forms of normative development.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
Independent accountability mechanism practice shows complex interactions among multilateral development banks, borrowers, and project implementing agencies.
“For instance, IAM-practice demonstrates the complex dynamics between MDBs, borrowers, and project implementing agencies;”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingreasoning
Legal doctrinal methods helped identify and categorise the collected data.
“the dynamic hypothesis would inform and direct the inquiry to look for 'needles in particle areas of the hay stack', whereas legal doctrinal methods, as will be discussed in the remainder of the article, would assist with the identification and categorisation ('coding') of collected data.84”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingreasoning
Legal doctrinal analysis was prominent in collecting and configuring the data in the issue overview component (5).
“Hence, as Section 3 will discuss in more detail, legal doctrinal analysis played a prominent role in collecting and configuring the data contained in the issue overview (component (5)).”
- Also stated in: § 4 The Place of Legal Doctrinal Analysis in Designing and Developing the IAM-Practice Database · plain
“Legal doctrinal analysis occupied a place of prominence during the IAM-practice database's design and development stages -notably, with respect to the issue overview component (5)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Also stated in: § 4 The Place of Legal Doctrinal Analysis in Designing and Developing the IAM-Practice Database · plain
- Findingnone given
Legal doctrinal methods helped design and develop a multipurpose database of independent accountability mechanism practice.
“The article demonstrates how legal doctrinal methods have contributed towards the design and development of a multipurpose IAM-practice database.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
One identified form clarifies and elaborates the relationship between MDB operational policy frameworks and the international legal system.
“clarifies, as well as elaborate, on the relationship between MDB operational policy frameworks and the international legal system”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingreasoning
In the database development stage, legal doctrinal analysis contributed significantly to collecting and categorising data.
“Legal doctrinal analysis made significant contributions with respect to the processes of data collection and categorisation”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingreasoning
Conceptual models developed during the design stage with legal doctrinal analysis helped the research team collaborate.
“the conceptual models developed during the design stage with the assistance of legal doctrinal analysis, also served to facilitate such collaboration.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingreasoning
The IAM-practice database enables integration of different research questions, methods, and theories.
“and also facilitates the integration of various types of research questions, methods and theories.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
One identified form strengthens the obligatory nature of operational policies.
“normative development that strengthens the 'obligatory nature' of the operational policies”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingreasoning
One identified form links restrictive or restraining elements in the policies to elements enabling particular institutional aims.
“links the restrictive or restraining elements contained in the policies (such as those aimed at avoiding or mitigating harm) to other elements aimed at enabling the realisation of particular institutional aims.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingreasoning
Independent accountability mechanism practice shows difficult trade-offs in balancing economic, social, and environmental interests to achieve sustainable development goals.
“the intricate trade-off decisions involved in 'balancing' economic, social, and environmental interests in order to realise the sustainable development objectives;”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingcitation
In interpreting 'in the Bank's opinion' in OP 4.04, the Inspection Panel accepted that the phrase indicated the need for and importance of the Bank's considered judgment on whether a project involved significant conversion or degradation of critical natural habitats.
“In interpreting the phrase, 'in the Bank's opinion' (contained in OP 4.04), the Inspection Panel acknowledged that it indicated 'the need for and importance of the considered judgment of the Bank' on the 'crucial question' whether a project involved 'significant conversion or degradation of critical natural habitats'.100”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [100]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Findingreasoning
IAM practice consists almost entirely of claims filed by external parties.
“however, IAM-practice consists almost entirely of claims filed by external parties.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingreasoning
One identified form enhances the precision or specificity of particular policy provisions.
“enhances the degree of 'precision' or specificity of 'particular policies provisions'”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingreasoning
The project uses a combination of legal and non-legal methods and theories to achieve specific research objectives, regardless of whether those objectives are predominantly legal or non-legal.
“the project employs a combination of legal and non-legal methods and theories in order to realise specific research objectives, irrespective of whether these objectives are predominantly legal or non-legal.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
Legal doctrinal analysis enabled identification of patterns and structures in the data that mere textual analysis could not have done.
“Legal doctrinal analysis certainly enabled the identification of patterns and structures in the data that mere textual analysis could not have done.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
The design and development of the IAM-practice database allowed the project's scope to include the entire dataset rather than a subset or selected case studies.
“facilitated by the design and development of the IAM-practice database, the project's scope could include the entire dataset, as opposed to a mere subset of IAM-practice or selected case studies.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisereasoning
IAMs are citizen-driven: they are mandated to receive claims directly from project-affected people or their authorised representatives about actual or potential harm from MDB non-compliance with operational policy frameworks.
“What makes these bodies unique, however, is the fact that they are citizen-driven -that is, they are mandated (usually, by the MDB's Board of Executive Directors) to receive claims directly from project-affected people and/or their authorised (civil society) representatives, concerning claims of actual or potential harm suffered as a result of the MDB's non-compliance with the relevant operational”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
MDBs have steadily expanded the scope of their development agendas over recent decades.
“are exacerbated by the fact that MDBs have steadily increased the scope of their development agendas over the past decades.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites J.W. Head
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites D.D. Bradlow and C. Grossman
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisereasoning
MDB operational policy frameworks combine informal best practices with formal operational policies and procedures.
“These operational policy frameworks incorporate informal best practices (norms that are recommended but not obligatory) as well as formal operational policies and procedures”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Over recent decades, MDBs, led by the World Bank Group, have responded to accountability concerns by creating internal normative frameworks for their development-lending operations.
“Over the past few decades, MDBs, with the World Bank Group blazing the trail, have responded to concerns about their accountability in a number of ways.44 Notably, MDBs have established internal normative frameworks to guide their development-lending operations.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The interpretive scheme emphasizes compliance with both procedural and substantive normative elements in the operational policies.
“An interpretative scheme, in other words, that emphasises compliance with both the procedural (process) and substantive (quality) normative elements contained in the operational policies.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation
Research on independent accountability mechanism practice could provide important understanding of the content and scope of multilateral development banks' international legal responsibilities, which are still unclear.
“Studying the practice of IAMs, therefore, could yield significant insights as to the content and scope of the international legal responsibilities of MDBs, which remain an ambiguous area.61”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [61]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
The IAM-practice research project is grounded in an interactional account of public international law.
“Grounded in an 'interactional account' of public international law (as reflected, notably, in the scholarship of Brunnée and Toope), 16 the IAM-practice research project is specifically interested in the norms”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Brunnée and Toope
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisereasoning
MDB development-lending operations involve intersecting legal and non-legal normative systems.
“In addition, MDB development-lending operations involve various (intersecting) normative systems that are both legal and non-legal ('social') in nature”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationnone given
Legal doctrinal methods have a distinct role within legal-interdisciplinary research methodologies.
“There is a distinct place for legal doctrinal methods in legalinterdisciplinary research methodologies”
- Also stated in: § 1 Introduction · plain
“There is a distinct place for legal doctrinal methods in legal-interdisciplinary research methodologies”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § 1 Introduction · plain
- Interpretationreasoning
Legal scholars do not need deep technical skills to conduct the kind of research described in the article.
“an important lesson derived from the experiences shared in this article is that deep technical skills are not a prerequisite for legal scholars to engage in the type of research described here.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The experiences of developing and deploying this advanced legal-interdisciplinary methodology to study IAM practice at MDBs are not very different from conventional legal doctrinal research projects.
“Perhaps the first conclusion to be drawn from the experiences with developing and deploying an advanced legal-interdisciplinary methodology to study the practice of IAMs at MDBs -as discussed in this article -is that they are not so different from the experiences of 'conventional' legal doctrinal research projects.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Using legal doctrinal analysis, the project concluded that certain Inspection Panel examples indicated a particular interpretive scheme developed and used by the Panel.
“By employing legal doctrinal analysis, the project came to the conclusion that these examples were indicative of a particular interpretive scheme developed and employed by the Inspection Panel.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The research methodology described belongs to the transdisciplinary research school of thought.
“Therefore, the research methodology that forms the subject of this discussion fits within the broader 'transdisciplinary research' (TR) school of thought”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Developing the conceptual models could not have been done by relying solely on one instrument in the methodological toolkit.
“The development of conceptual models, for example, which fulfil several important functions within this project, could not have been done by relying solely on one instrument in the methodological toolkit.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Because it employed legal doctrinal methods with other methods and theories, the project could conclude that law has a distinct place in transnational regulatory governance contexts.
“because of its employment of legal doctrinal methods, in combination with other methods and theories, the project could conclude that law has a distinct place in transnational regulatory governance contexts -that is, if you know where to look for law, and how to find it.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Legal doctrinal methods have a prominent place in this research methodology because they make a distinct and significant contribution to facilitating inquiry and collaboration within the research team.
“Legal doctrinal methods occupy a prominent place within this research methodology because they make a distinct and significant contribution towards facilitating inquiry as well as collaboration within the research team.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The IAM-practice research project generated new perspectives on the place of law in transnational regulatory governance partly because it was based in a constructivist, interactional conception of legal normativity.
“the IAM-practice research project has been able to generate new perspectives on this matter firstly, because it has been based in a constructivist, interactional (as opposed to a positivistic) conception of legal normativity.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 33
- May combine two claims. 15
- The quote only partly states this claim. 1
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingnone givenThe independent accountability mechanism practice database served as the project's analytical platform.
“The IAM-practice database 74 provides the project's analytical platform.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
FindingcitationIn Uganda: Power Projects, World Bank management decided that the Natural Habitats safeguard policy (OP/BP 4.04) did not apply because the project had identified offsetting actions for the inundation of Bujagali Falls, so it would not significantly convert or degrade a critical natural habitat under OP 4.04.
“Hence, management concluded, the project would not be 'significantly converting or degrading a 'critical natural habitat' as defined in OP 4.04.' 99”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [98]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [99]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Findingnone givenIndependent accountability mechanism practice shows tension between institutional performance areas serving commercial objectives and those serving public objectives, including avoiding and mitigating social and environmental harm.
“as well as the tension among institutional performance areas aimed at meeting commercial objectives and those aimed at public objectives, including the avoidance and mitigation of social and environmental 'harm' or material adverse effects.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
FindingreasoningBecause the issue component was hypothesis-driven, the dynamic hypothesis played a central role in designing the data collection, categorisation, and configuration processes.
“Because the issue component of the database is hypothesis-driven, the dynamic hypothesis plays a fundamental role during the database design stage -especially with regard to designing the data collection, categorisation, and configuration processes.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: The project's initial dynamic hypothesis assumed that courts performing judicial review and citizen-initiated accountability mechanisms at multilateral development banks performing fact-finding and compliance review are functionally equivalent.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.
FindingreasoningThe dynamic hypothesis guided the database design and helped direct data collection and configuration.
“the dynamic hypothesis would inform and direct the inquiry to look for 'needles in particle areas of the hay stack', whereas legal doctrinal methods, as will be discussed in the remainder of the article, would assist with the identification and categorisation ('coding') of collected data.84”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: The project's initial dynamic hypothesis assumed that courts performing judicial review and citizen-initiated accountability mechanisms at multilateral development banks performing fact-finding and compliance review are functionally equivalent.
May combine two claims.
Findingnone givenIn the project, conceptual models and the independent accountability mechanism practice database were two closely related mechanisms that enabled integration of different methods, theories, and research questions.
“In this project, two (closely related) mechanisms facilitate such integration: conceptual models 73 (discussed in Section 4) and the IAM-practice database ('database'), which will be introduced in the remainder of this section.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Findingnone givenThe IAM-practice database serves as the analytical platform of the research project.
“This database constitutes the analytical platform of the research project”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
FindingreasoningThrough normativity as a shared surface, the team could interact by reasoning from and through the norms in the data source material.
“through the 'shared surface' offered by normativity, the team could interact by reasoning from and through the norms contained in the data source material.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
FindingreasoningThe Panel argued that the phrase did not give management a blank check to apply or not apply policy provisions to a project, but required management to form and expressly provide an opinion on the issue.
“However, the Panel argued, the inclusion of this phrase in the policy did not imply or give Management a blank check to apply or not certain policy provisions to a specific project but rather requires Management to form and provide expressly an opinion on the issue in”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
FindingcitationThe detailed issue tree underlying the quasi-judicial review model formed the basis for designing the issue-view component of the database, with each branch representing a distinct data category or issue code.
“Ultimately, the detailed issue tree underlying the (quasi-) judicial review model formed the basis for the design of the issue-view component of the IAM-practice database, with each 'branch' of the issue tree representing a distinct data category (or issue 'code').92”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: The conceptual model assumed that quasi-judicial institutions assert and expand their de facto independence and authority relative to political institutions, but not without limit, because backlash from political institutions eventually constrains further growth.
- The authors state this as an assumption: The conceptual model assumed that quasi-judicial institutions fluctuate between activism and restraint, and that their survival requires incremental expansion along a general line of progression.
- The authors state this as an assumption: The conceptual model assumed that quasi-judicial institutions assert and expand their authority relative to political institutions by developing doctrines, principled approaches, or interpretative schemes such as the margin of appreciation doctrine.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Findingnone givenComponent (5) of the database required a significant degree of interpretation.
“What further distinguishes component (5) is the fact that it involves a significant degree of interpretation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Findingnone givenThe project used these methods to analyse landmark cases in national and supranational constitutional systems and judicial-political dynamics, and to analyse a subset of independent accountability mechanism practice material.
“The project employed these methods to analyse landmark cases in a number of national and supranational constitutional systems, as well as the dynamics between judicial and political institutions; 90 and, to analyse a subset of IAM-practice material.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Findingnone givenMost of the project's source data is text, though atypical legal text.
“most of the project's source data is text (albeit a-typical legal text)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingnone givenLegal doctrinal methods proved to be a synergetic fit with the recursive approach to problem solving underlying this project.
“Legal doctrinal methods have, however, proved to be a synergetic fit with the 'recursive approach to problem solving' underlying this project.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenRegular review of recently collected and configured data ensured data quality and often led to refinement of the conceptual model and database design.
“The team would regularly review recently collected and configured data, which would not only ensure data quality but would often also result in further refinement of the conceptual model and the database design.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationLegal norms can be distinguished from non-legal or social norms by criteria that assess their relative degrees of legality and obligation.
“Moreover, legal norms can be distinguished from non-legal or social norms by employing 'criteria' that assess their relative degrees of 'legality' and 'obligation'”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Brunnée and Toope
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisereasoningA second MDB response to accountability concerns was the creation of independent accountability mechanisms.
“A second response, which is of particular significance for this discussion, concerns the establishment of independent accountability mechanisms.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationDifferent forms of transnational regulatory governance share core features, including a shift from formal to informal governance arrangements that makes the formal/informal distinction often ambiguous.
“Different forms of transnational regulatory governance, moreover, share core characteristics.These include, for example, a shift from formal to informal governance and regulatory arrangements, structures, and processeswhich means that the distinction between what is considered 'formal' and 'informal' often becomes ambiguous.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Von Bogdandy et al., above n.2
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationAcademic commentators, including the author, tend to view independent accountability mechanisms as hybrid mechanisms with some court-like features.
“academic commentators (including this author) tend to view IAMs as 'hybrid' mechanisms with certain court-like features.58”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [58]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe creation of IAMs put individuals, for the first time in public international law history, in a legally relevant relationship with an international organisation.
“The establishment of IAMs placed individualsfor the first time in the history of public international law -in a 'legally relevant relationship' vis-à-vis an international organisation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites E. Hey
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
PremisecitationInterdisciplinary approaches are well suited to inquiry that can shed new light on real-world problems.
“Interdisciplinary approaches, despite their challenges, are well equipped to facilitate inquiry that can 'shed new light on … actual problem[s]'.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Brewer
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningIndependent accountability mechanism practice offers a distinctive view of multilateral development bank lending operations and may also support inquiry into matters that are not wholly legal or only law-related.
“As the research project proceeded, it became increasingly clear that IAM-practice provides a unique window onto MDB development-lending operations that might also facilitate inquiry into matters that are not 'entirely legal', or that are merely 'law related'.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe World Bank's operational policy framework is the Inspection Panel's only basis for review.
“The World Bank's operational policy framework forms the Panel's only basis for review”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Inspection Panel Resolution (1993)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationMDBs worry that claims filed at IAMs could be used to challenge their qualified immunity before domestic courts, as happened in at least one unsuccessful instance in the World Bank Inspection Panel's history.
“MDBs are concerned that claims filed at the IAMs might be used as a basis for challenging their qualified immunity before domestic courtsas had occurred in at least one (unsuccessful) instance in the institutional history of the World Bank Inspection Panel”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Shihata
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Premisenone givenMultilateral development bank development-lending operations are a form of transnational regulatory governance.
“The development-lending operations of multilateral development banks are described as a form of transnational regulatory governance for a number of reasons”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisereasoningIAMs give affected individuals an avenue of recourse and at least the possibility of redress.
“In other words, the IAMs also provide affected individuals with an avenue of recourse as well as (at least) the potential for redress.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenThe classification of IAMs as non-judicial or quasi-judicial is contested and tied to debate over the legal character of MDB operational policy frameworks.
“That being said, the 'non-judicial' versus 'quasi-judicial' nature of these bodies remains a point of contentionand is also related to debate about the legal nature of the MDBs' operational policy frameworks.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe World Bank Inspection Panel was the first IAM of its kind, and its creation led to similar developments at other MDBs.
“For a history of the Inspection Panel's establishment, the first IAM of this kind, and which establishment led to similar developments at other MDBs, see e.g.Shihata”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Shihata
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisereasoningSafeguard policies form a critical part of MDB operational policy frameworks and aim to manage environmental, social, and economic risks.
“A critical part of these operational policy frameworks includes the safeguard policies, which are aimed specifically at managing environmental, social, and economic risks.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
InterpretationreasoningFor legal scholars doing this research, intermediate proficiency with standard software such as MS Excel and a sound grasp of key concepts and analytical tools in IT project management can be effective and cost-efficient.
“an intermediate level of proficiency with standard software such as MS Excel as well as a sound understanding of the principles behind key theoretical concepts and analytical tools employed in an area such as IT project management, 6 for instance, can be decidedly effective -not to mention, cost efficient.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
InterpretationreasoningThe project concluded that the issue of multilateral development bank accountability needs to be addressed through a legal-interdisciplinary approach.
“Hence, the project concluded that the issue of 'MDB-accountability' needs to be addressed by means of a legal-interdisciplinary approach.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [68]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [69]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [71]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationThe primary purpose of an interdisciplinary approach is solving real-world problems.
“This article views the primary purpose of an interdisciplinary approach (or, the principle motivating factor for employing such an approach) as 'problem solving in the real world'.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Hirsch Hadorn et al.
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataExamples from Chile Pangue and Chad Petroleum show how law gains a place in transnational regulatory governance through thin procedural commitments and expands it by facilitating thick substantive commitments via the dispute resolution triad.
“Examples such as these demonstrate how law attains its place in transnational regulatory governance contexts through 'thin' (procedural) normative commitments”
- Also stated in: § 4.2 Developing the Database: Legal Doctrinal Analysis Supporting Data Collection and Classification · plain
“and also how law secures and expands its place in these contexts by facilitating the realisation of 'thick' (substantive) normative commitments -notably, by means of the 'dispute resolution triad' formed between individual claimants, MDB Management (the 'respondents'), and IAMs (with Executive Board usually acting as final arbitral body).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Brunnée and Toope, above n.16, at 86
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Shapiro and Stone Sweet, above n.60
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Also stated in: § 4.2 Developing the Database: Legal Doctrinal Analysis Supporting Data Collection and Classification · plain
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisenone givenMDB development-lending operations involve many state and non-state actors, including project-affected people, who participate in activities, governance structures, and processes around MDB-financed projects.
“MDB development-lending operations 27 involve a wide range of state and non-state actors -including individuals ('project-affected people') 28 -participating (in various capacities) in the activities, governance structures, and processes surrounding development projects financed (or co-financed) by MDBs.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisereasoningIAMs are mandated to enforce relevant operational policy frameworks and, through fact-finding, problem-solving, compliance review, policy advice, and monitoring, to strengthen MDB management and governance.
“These bodies are mandated to enforce the relevant operational policy frameworks and, through their functions of fact-finding, problem-solving, compliance review, policy advice, and monitoring, to strengthen the MDBs' management and governance structures.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationTransdisciplinary research aims to better fit academic knowledge production to societal needs for solving, mitigating, or preventing problems.
“which 'aims at better fitting academic knowledge production to societal needs for solving, mitigating, or preventing problems'.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Hirsch Hadorn et al.
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisereasoningThe legal character of MDB operational policy frameworks is contested.
“The 'legal nature' of these operational policy frameworks remains a point of contention.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationreasoningOnce legal researchers overcome the methodological obstacles of IAM-practice material's format and content, they intuitively know what to do with the data.
“once legal researchers overcome the methodological obstacles presented by the particular format and content of IAM-practice material -which include an ambiguous and inconsistent use of legal terminology (by claimants, MDB management, Board of Executive Directors, and IAMs alike) 128 -they intuitively know 'what to do with the data'.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationown dataThe experience of this research project indicates that integrating legal doctrinal methods is no more or less challenging than integrating other elements.
“the experience with this research project indicates that the integration of legal doctrinal methods does not present any more or less of a challenge than those of other elements.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationClaims filed before IAMs arise from conflicts of social practice, as legal cases do, and resolving them requires interpretative techniques and principled or reasoned schemes similar to those used by courts.
“the claims filed before IAMs 'arise out of the conflicts of social practice', 126 as is true for legal cases, and the resolution of such claims require the deployment of interpretative techniques and principled or reasoned interpretative schemes similar to those employed by courts.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [126]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [127]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
The authors state this as an assumption.
Legal scholars are less familiar with MDB development-lending operations than with the operations of international institutions such as the United Nations.
“nor are they as familiar with the development-lending operations of MDBs than they typically are with the operations of international institutions such as the United Nations.7”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The project's initial dynamic hypothesis assumed that courts performing judicial review and citizen-initiated accountability mechanisms at multilateral development banks performing fact-finding and compliance review are functionally equivalent.
“The project's initial 'dynamic hypothesis' 66 argued that there is a functional equivalence between judicial institutions executing mandates of judicial review and citizen-driven IAMs at MDBs executing mandates of fact-finding and compliance review.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The conceptual model assumed that quasi-judicial institutions assert and expand their de facto independence and authority relative to political institutions, but not without limit, because backlash from political institutions eventually constrains further growth.
“The model posits that (quasi-) judicial institutions assert and expand their de facto independence and authority vis-à-vis political institutions; but not indefinitely, as their actions are bound to trigger factors limiting further assertion and expansion (i.e.limiting 'growth') -such as 'backlash' from political institutions.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The conceptual model assumed that quasi-judicial institutions fluctuate between activism and restraint, and that their survival requires incremental expansion along a general line of progression.
“In this way, (quasi-) judicial institutions tend to fluctuate between periods of activism and restraint, but their survival ultimately requires expansion -albeit incremental expansion -along the general line of progression.91”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The conceptual model assumed that quasi-judicial institutions assert and expand their authority relative to political institutions by developing doctrines, principled approaches, or interpretative schemes such as the margin of appreciation doctrine.
“For example, the model conceptualises that (quasi-) judicial institutions assert and expand their authority/ power vis-à-vis political institutions by developing and employing 'doctrines', principled approaches, or interpretative schemes -such as the margin of appreciation doctrine developed by the European Court of Human Rights.93”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Discussion is assigned to the wrong section
MinorThe text says Section 3 will discuss legal doctrinal analysis in more detail, but the dedicated discussion appears in Section 4, including its subsection on data collection and classification.
“Hence, as Section 3 will discuss in more detail, legal doctrinal analysis played a prominent role in collecting and configuring the data contained in the issue overview (component (5)).”
“## 4.2 Developing the Database: Legal Doctrinal Analysis Supporting Data Collection and Classification”
Cites
‘Accountability’: An Ever‐Expanding Concept?
Mulgan, R. (2000) · Public Administration · doi:10.1111/1467-9299.00218 · Cited by 1,609 · see citing works
Methods of IT Project Management
Brewer, J. L., & Dittman, K. C. (2018) · Purdue University Press eBooks · doi:10.2307/j.ctv15wxrd5 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Exciting Times for Legal Scholarship
Vranken, J. B. M. (2012) · Recht en Methode in onderzoek en onderwijs · doi:10.5553/rem/221225082012002002004 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Relative Autonomy, A Characterisation of the Discipline of LawPreprint
Taekema, S. (2010) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.1579992 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Law's Misguided Love Affair with Science
Feldman, R. (2009) · Minnesota journal of law science & technology · doi:10.24926/15529541.3550 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
On Being Accountable in a Kaleidoscopic World
Weiss, E. B. (2010) · Proceedings of the ASIL Annual Meeting · doi:10.5305/procannmeetasil.104.0477 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Institutional and Procedural Aspects of the Inspection Panel
Bissell, R. E. (2000) · Brill | Nijhoff eBooks · doi:10.1163/9789004480971_008 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Cisse, H., Bradlow, D. D., & Kingsbury, B. (2012) · doi:10.1596/978-0-8213-8863-1
Flagged first, then by citations
1 of the 9 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- [2]2. I am not alone in making this observation -see e.g. D.D. Bradlow and D. Hunter (eds.), International Financial Institutions and International Law (2010), remarking (at xxviii-xxix) that it is 'striking how little atten- tion has been paid to the international legal issues relating to the opera- tions of the International Monitory Fund, the World Bank Group, and the regional development banks …'.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Köhler, J. C., & Bowra, A. (2020) · Globalization and Health · doi:10.1186/s12992-020-00629-5 · Cited by 74 · see citing works
The Global Fund: why anti-corruption, transparency and accountability matter
Chang, Z., Rusu, V., & Köhler, J. C. (2021) · Globalization and Health · doi:10.1186/s12992-021-00753-w · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Doctrinal Research in Law: Meaning, Scope and Methodology
Majeed, N., Hilal, A., & Khan, A. N. (2023) · Bulletin of Business and Economics (BBE) · doi:10.61506/01.00167 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Artificial Intelligence in the Tourism Industry: A privacy impasse
Putera, N. S. F. M. S., Saripan, H., Bajury, M. S. M., & Ya’cob, S. N. (2022) · Environment-Behaviour Proceedings Journal · doi:10.21834/ebpj.v7isi7.3812 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
“3.0 Methodology This study compares its activities to those of a legal interdisciplinary interest, a method for developing legal arguments involving input from other fields of knowledge, in this case, Artificial Intelligence, information security and data protection law (Naudé Fourie, 2015).”
MethodInfluentialHapuhennedige, S., Bernsen, E. C., & Köhler, J. C. (2020) · Accounting, finance, sustainability, governance & fraud · doi:10.1007/978-981-15-1424-1_7 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Putera, N. S. F. M. S., Abdullah, S. M., Rahman, N. A., Hassan, R. A., Saripan, H., & Haryanto, I. (2021) · Environment-Behaviour Proceedings Journal · doi:10.21834/ebpj.v6i16.2635 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Bakta, S. (2019) · World conference on child and youth · doi:10.17501/26731037.2019.1101 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
4.2 Die erweiterte Fallmethodik als Forschungsstil
Schäfer, D. (2023) · Global studies · doi:10.14361/9783839469644-022 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Das Inspection Panel der Weltbank
Schäfer, D. (2023) · Global studies · doi:10.14361/9783839469644 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
An Alternative Approach to Solving the Dilemma of Litigation and Liability Disputes in Outer Space
Evirgen, M. (2019) · The Student Journal of Professional Practice and Academic Research · doi:10.19164/sjppar.v1i2.877
A managerial approach for the coherent development of sustainable development law
de Moerloose, S., & Mbengue, M. M. (2018) · Revista Jurídica Piélagus · doi:10.25054/16576799.1839
Sirait, Y. H., & Narwastuty, D. S. (2022) · Legitimasi Jurnal Hukum Pidana dan Politik Hukum · doi:10.22373/legitimasi.v11i1.13722
Das Inspection Panel der Weltbank
Schäfer, D. (2023) · transcript Verlag eBooks · doi:10.1515/9783839469644
7.2 Das Inspection Panel aus Perspektive der Entpolitisierung
Schäfer, D. (2023) · Global studies · doi:10.14361/9783839469644-034
2.2 Aktivistische- und machtkritische Ansätze
Schäfer, D. (2023) · Global studies · doi:10.14361/9783839469644-012
1.1 Die Entstehung des Inspection Panels im Kontext der globalisierungskritischen Protestbewegung
Schäfer, D. (2023) · Global studies · doi:10.14361/9783839469644-006
Übersicht Beschwerdemechanismen
Schäfer, D. (2023) · Global studies · doi:10.14361/9783839469644-040
3.4 Machtkritische Perspektiven auf Organisationswandel
Schäfer, D. (2023) · Global studies · doi:10.14361/9783839469644-018
IP-Mitglieder, IP-Sekretariatsleitung und WB-Präsidenten
Schäfer, D. (2023) · Global studies · doi:10.14361/9783839469644-041
6.5 Kontextanalyse zu aktuellen Reformprozessen
Schäfer, D. (2023) · Global studies · doi:10.14361/9783839469644-032
6.3 Wirkungsanalyse: Das Uganda Transport Sector Development Project
Schäfer, D. (2023) · Global studies · doi:10.14361/9783839469644-030
3.1 Rechenschaftspflicht, Organisationslernen und Partizipation
Schäfer, D. (2023) · Global studies · doi:10.14361/9783839469644-015
6.4 Ergebnisbezogene Diskussion der Wirkungsanalyse
Schäfer, D. (2023) · Global studies · doi:10.14361/9783839469644-031
Schäfer, D. (2023) · Global studies · doi:10.14361/9783839469644-038
6.1 Trends zur Qualität der Projekte und Projektüberwachung
Schäfer, D. (2023) · Global studies · doi:10.14361/9783839469644-028
Schäfer, D. (2023) · Global studies · doi:10.14361/9783839469644-002
2.1 Ansätze des Internationalen Rechts und des Soft Laws
Schäfer, D. (2023) · Global studies · doi:10.14361/9783839469644-011
4.1 Methodologische Vorüberlegungen
Schäfer, D. (2023) · Global studies · doi:10.14361/9783839469644-021
4.3 Die vier Erweiterungsschritte und ihre Anwendung
Schäfer, D. (2023) · Global studies · doi:10.14361/9783839469644-023
1.2 Gründung, Struktur und Aufbau der Weltbankgruppe
Schäfer, D. (2023) · Global studies · doi:10.14361/9783839469644-007
Schäfer, D. (2023) · Global studies · doi:10.14361/9783839469644-toc
Schäfer, D. (2023) · Global studies · doi:10.14361/9783839469644-019
8.2 Methodische Reflexionen im Kontext machtkritischer Bürokratieforschung
Schäfer, D. (2023) · Global studies · doi:10.14361/9783839469644-037
3.3 Organisationslernen in der Bürokratieforschung
Schäfer, D. (2023) · Global studies · doi:10.14361/9783839469644-017
Schäfer, D. (2023) · Global studies · doi:10.14361/9783839469644-001
5.3 Zwischenergebnisse der institutionellen Bedingungsanalyse
Schäfer, D. (2023) · Global studies · doi:10.14361/9783839469644-027
4.4 Methodenwahl und empirische Erhebungsinstrumente
Schäfer, D. (2023) · Global studies · doi:10.14361/9783839469644-024
Schäfer, D. (2023) · Global studies · doi:10.14361/9783839469644-008
Schäfer, D. (2023) · Global studies · doi:10.14361/9783839469644-005
Schäfer, D. (2023) · Global studies · doi:10.14361/9783839469644-fm
1.4 Ergebnisse der Untersuchung
Schäfer, D. (2023) · Global studies · doi:10.14361/9783839469644-009
7.1 Das Inspection Panel zwischen Organisationslernen und Hypocrisy
Schäfer, D. (2023) · Global studies · doi:10.14361/9783839469644-033
3.6 Machtkritische Perspektiven auf Rechenschaftspflicht
Schäfer, D. (2023) · Global studies · doi:10.14361/9783839469644-020
2.4 Positionierung und Abgrenzung zum Forschungsstand
Schäfer, D. (2023) · Global studies · doi:10.14361/9783839469644-014
Schäfer, D. (2023) · Global studies · doi:10.14361/9783839469644-003
Schäfer, D. (2023) · Global studies · doi:10.14361/9783839469644-025
Schäfer, D. (2023) · Global studies · doi:10.14361/9783839469644-004
Schäfer, D. (2023) · Global studies · doi:10.14361/9783839469644-036
7.3 Entwicklung als entpolitisierende Logik im Rechenschaftsdiskurs
Schäfer, D. (2023) · Global studies · doi:10.14361/9783839469644-035
Schäfer, D. (2023) · Global studies · doi:10.14361/9783839469644-026
6.2 Trends zum Verlauf von Beschwerdeverfahren
Schäfer, D. (2023) · Global studies · doi:10.14361/9783839469644-029
2.3 Ansätze der Governance-Forschung
Schäfer, D. (2023) · Global studies · doi:10.14361/9783839469644-013
3.2 Die Rolle von Rechenschaftspflicht in der Weltbank-Reformforschung
Schäfer, D. (2023) · Global studies · doi:10.14361/9783839469644-016
Schäfer, D. (2023) · Global studies · doi:10.14361/9783839469644-010
Schäfer, D. (2023) · Global studies · doi:10.14361/9783839469644-039
Project finance through Infrastructure Investment Trust: Legal and regulatory analysis
Kashyap, A. K., & Sharma, V. (2024) · Risk Governance and Control Financial Markets & Institutions · doi:10.22495/rgcv14i2p7
“It becomes a platform to promote further research (Fourie, 2015).”
BackgroundWang, S., & Xie, Y. (2026) · Cogent Social Sciences · doi:10.1080/23311886.2026.2717896
- Authors
- Naudé Fourie, A.
- Venue
- Erasmus Law Review
- Publisher
- Koninklijke Boom uitgevers
- Published
- 2015-12
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 95-110
- ISSN
- 2210-2671 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2284617041
- Semantic Scholar
- 7517f1ec1169a011f36e760d75ac389d7146de87
- Cited by
- 58
- References
- 9
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 46 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1
- FWCI
- 4.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- public-domain
- Locations
- Erasmus Law Review (publishedVersion, public-domain)
- EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- RePub (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- RePub (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Law › Legal Studies and Policies
- Social Sciences › Law › Comparative and International Law Studies
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration
- Keywords
- multilateral development banks, research methodology
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-01.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-01.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review