Cited by 58Legal Studies and PoliciesComparative and International Law StudiesInterdisciplinary Research and Collaboration

Expounding the Place of Legal Doctrinal Methods in Legal-Interdisciplinary Research: Experiences with Studying the Practice of Independent Accountability Mechanisms at Multilateral Development Banks

Open access
Naudé Fourie, Andria·2015·Erasmus Law Review

Abstract

Expounding the Place of Legal Doctrinal Methods in Legal-Interdisciplinary Research There is a distinct place for legal doctrinal methods in legal-interdisciplinary research methodologies, but there is value to be had in expounding that place – in developing a deeper understanding, for instance, of what legal doctrinal analysis has to offer, wherein lies its limitations, and how it could work in concert with methods and theories from disciplinary areas other than law. This article offers such perspectives, based on experiences with an ‘advanced’ legal-interdisciplinary methodology, which facilitates a long-term study of the growing body of practice generated by citizen-driven, independent accountability mechanisms (IAMs) that are institutionally affiliated with multilateral development banks. The article demonstrates how legal doctrinal methods have contributed towards the design and development of a multipurpose IAM-practice database. This database constitutes the analytical platform of the research project and also facilitates the integration of various types of research questions, methods and theories.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5553/elr.000045

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

0 of 24 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

  • Findingreasoning

    The team could identify a potential data entry using legal doctrinal analysis even when the entry's meaning or issue-code was initially unclear.

    “the team could identify a potential data entry by employing legal doctrinal analysis, even as it was not immediately clear what the data entry signified, or with which issuecode(s) the data entry should be configured within the database.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingnone given

    By using legal doctrinal methods with other tools, the project identified various forms of normative development.

    “Finally, by employing legal doctrinal methods in concert with other conceptual and analytical tools, the project identified various forms of normative development.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingnone given

    Independent accountability mechanism practice shows complex interactions among multilateral development banks, borrowers, and project implementing agencies.

    “For instance, IAM-practice demonstrates the complex dynamics between MDBs, borrowers, and project implementing agencies;”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingreasoning

    Legal doctrinal methods helped identify and categorise the collected data.

    “the dynamic hypothesis would inform and direct the inquiry to look for 'needles in particle areas of the hay stack', whereas legal doctrinal methods, as will be discussed in the remainder of the article, would assist with the identification and categorisation ('coding') of collected data.84”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingreasoning

    Legal doctrinal analysis was prominent in collecting and configuring the data in the issue overview component (5).

    “Hence, as Section 3 will discuss in more detail, legal doctrinal analysis played a prominent role in collecting and configuring the data contained in the issue overview (component (5)).”
    • Also stated in: § 4 The Place of Legal Doctrinal Analysis in Designing and Developing the IAM-Practice Database · plain
      “Legal doctrinal analysis occupied a place of prominence during the IAM-practice database's design and development stages -notably, with respect to the issue overview component (5)”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 33
  • May combine two claims. 15
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 1
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingnone given

    The independent accountability mechanism practice database served as the project's analytical platform.

    “The IAM-practice database 74 provides the project's analytical platform.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Findingcitation

    In Uganda: Power Projects, World Bank management decided that the Natural Habitats safeguard policy (OP/BP 4.04) did not apply because the project had identified offsetting actions for the inundation of Bujagali Falls, so it would not significantly convert or degrade a critical natural habitat under OP 4.04.

    “Hence, management concluded, the project would not be 'significantly converting or degrading a 'critical natural habitat' as defined in OP 4.04.' 99”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [98]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites [99]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Findingnone given

    Independent accountability mechanism practice shows tension between institutional performance areas serving commercial objectives and those serving public objectives, including avoiding and mitigating social and environmental harm.

    “as well as the tension among institutional performance areas aimed at meeting commercial objectives and those aimed at public objectives, including the avoidance and mitigation of social and environmental 'harm' or material adverse effects.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingreasoning

    Because the issue component was hypothesis-driven, the dynamic hypothesis played a central role in designing the data collection, categorisation, and configuration processes.

    “Because the issue component of the database is hypothesis-driven, the dynamic hypothesis plays a fundamental role during the database design stage -especially with regard to designing the data collection, categorisation, and configuration processes.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • The authors state this as an assumption: The project's initial dynamic hypothesis assumed that courts performing judicial review and citizen-initiated accountability mechanisms at multilateral development banks performing fact-finding and compliance review are functionally equivalent.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.

    Findingreasoning

    The dynamic hypothesis guided the database design and helped direct data collection and configuration.

    “the dynamic hypothesis would inform and direct the inquiry to look for 'needles in particle areas of the hay stack', whereas legal doctrinal methods, as will be discussed in the remainder of the article, would assist with the identification and categorisation ('coding') of collected data.84”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • The authors state this as an assumption: The project's initial dynamic hypothesis assumed that courts performing judicial review and citizen-initiated accountability mechanisms at multilateral development banks performing fact-finding and compliance review are functionally equivalent.
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    In the project, conceptual models and the independent accountability mechanism practice database were two closely related mechanisms that enabled integration of different methods, theories, and research questions.

    “In this project, two (closely related) mechanisms facilitate such integration: conceptual models 73 (discussed in Section 4) and the IAM-practice database ('database'), which will be introduced in the remainder of this section.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Findingnone given

    The IAM-practice database serves as the analytical platform of the research project.

    “This database constitutes the analytical platform of the research project”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingreasoning

    Through normativity as a shared surface, the team could interact by reasoning from and through the norms in the data source material.

    “through the 'shared surface' offered by normativity, the team could interact by reasoning from and through the norms contained in the data source material.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning

    The Panel argued that the phrase did not give management a blank check to apply or not apply policy provisions to a project, but required management to form and expressly provide an opinion on the issue.

    “However, the Panel argued, the inclusion of this phrase in the policy did not imply or give Management a blank check to apply or not certain policy provisions to a specific project but rather requires Management to form and provide expressly an opinion on the issue in”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingcitation

    The detailed issue tree underlying the quasi-judicial review model formed the basis for designing the issue-view component of the database, with each branch representing a distinct data category or issue code.

    “Ultimately, the detailed issue tree underlying the (quasi-) judicial review model formed the basis for the design of the issue-view component of the IAM-practice database, with each 'branch' of the issue tree representing a distinct data category (or issue 'code').92”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • The authors state this as an assumption: The conceptual model assumed that quasi-judicial institutions assert and expand their de facto independence and authority relative to political institutions, but not without limit, because backlash from political institutions eventually constrains further growth.
    • The authors state this as an assumption: The conceptual model assumed that quasi-judicial institutions fluctuate between activism and restraint, and that their survival requires incremental expansion along a general line of progression.
    • The authors state this as an assumption: The conceptual model assumed that quasi-judicial institutions assert and expand their authority relative to political institutions by developing doctrines, principled approaches, or interpretative schemes such as the margin of appreciation doctrine.
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Findingnone given

    Component (5) of the database required a significant degree of interpretation.

    “What further distinguishes component (5) is the fact that it involves a significant degree of interpretation.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    The project used these methods to analyse landmark cases in national and supranational constitutional systems and judicial-political dynamics, and to analyse a subset of independent accountability mechanism practice material.

    “The project employed these methods to analyse landmark cases in a number of national and supranational constitutional systems, as well as the dynamics between judicial and political institutions; 90 and, to analyse a subset of IAM-practice material.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Findingnone given

    Most of the project's source data is text, though atypical legal text.

    “most of the project's source data is text (albeit a-typical legal text)”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingnone given

    Legal doctrinal methods proved to be a synergetic fit with the recursive approach to problem solving underlying this project.

    “Legal doctrinal methods have, however, proved to be a synergetic fit with the 'recursive approach to problem solving' underlying this project.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    Regular review of recently collected and configured data ensured data quality and often led to refinement of the conceptual model and database design.

    “The team would regularly review recently collected and configured data, which would not only ensure data quality but would often also result in further refinement of the conceptual model and the database design.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Legal norms can be distinguished from non-legal or social norms by criteria that assess their relative degrees of legality and obligation.

    “Moreover, legal norms can be distinguished from non-legal or social norms by employing 'criteria' that assess their relative degrees of 'legality' and 'obligation'”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Brunnée and Toope

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisereasoning

    A second MDB response to accountability concerns was the creation of independent accountability mechanisms.

    “A second response, which is of particular significance for this discussion, concerns the establishment of independent accountability mechanisms.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Different forms of transnational regulatory governance share core features, including a shift from formal to informal governance arrangements that makes the formal/informal distinction often ambiguous.

    “Different forms of transnational regulatory governance, moreover, share core characteristics.These include, for example, a shift from formal to informal governance and regulatory arrangements, structures, and processeswhich means that the distinction between what is considered 'formal' and 'informal' often becomes ambiguous.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Von Bogdandy et al., above n.2

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Academic commentators, including the author, tend to view independent accountability mechanisms as hybrid mechanisms with some court-like features.

    “academic commentators (including this author) tend to view IAMs as 'hybrid' mechanisms with certain court-like features.58”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [58]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The creation of IAMs put individuals, for the first time in public international law history, in a legally relevant relationship with an international organisation.

    “The establishment of IAMs placed individualsfor the first time in the history of public international law -in a 'legally relevant relationship' vis-à-vis an international organisation.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites E. Hey

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Premisecitation

    Interdisciplinary approaches are well suited to inquiry that can shed new light on real-world problems.

    “Interdisciplinary approaches, despite their challenges, are well equipped to facilitate inquiry that can 'shed new light on … actual problem[s]'.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Brewer

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Independent accountability mechanism practice offers a distinctive view of multilateral development bank lending operations and may also support inquiry into matters that are not wholly legal or only law-related.

    “As the research project proceeded, it became increasingly clear that IAM-practice provides a unique window onto MDB development-lending operations that might also facilitate inquiry into matters that are not 'entirely legal', or that are merely 'law related'.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The World Bank's operational policy framework is the Inspection Panel's only basis for review.

    “The World Bank's operational policy framework forms the Panel's only basis for review”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Inspection Panel Resolution (1993)

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    MDBs worry that claims filed at IAMs could be used to challenge their qualified immunity before domestic courts, as happened in at least one unsuccessful instance in the World Bank Inspection Panel's history.

    “MDBs are concerned that claims filed at the IAMs might be used as a basis for challenging their qualified immunity before domestic courtsas had occurred in at least one (unsuccessful) instance in the institutional history of the World Bank Inspection Panel”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Shihata

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Premisenone given

    Multilateral development bank development-lending operations are a form of transnational regulatory governance.

    “The development-lending operations of multilateral development banks are described as a form of transnational regulatory governance for a number of reasons”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisereasoning

    IAMs give affected individuals an avenue of recourse and at least the possibility of redress.

    “In other words, the IAMs also provide affected individuals with an avenue of recourse as well as (at least) the potential for redress.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    The classification of IAMs as non-judicial or quasi-judicial is contested and tied to debate over the legal character of MDB operational policy frameworks.

    “That being said, the 'non-judicial' versus 'quasi-judicial' nature of these bodies remains a point of contentionand is also related to debate about the legal nature of the MDBs' operational policy frameworks.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The World Bank Inspection Panel was the first IAM of its kind, and its creation led to similar developments at other MDBs.

    “For a history of the Inspection Panel's establishment, the first IAM of this kind, and which establishment led to similar developments at other MDBs, see e.g.Shihata”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Shihata

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisereasoning

    Safeguard policies form a critical part of MDB operational policy frameworks and aim to manage environmental, social, and economic risks.

    “A critical part of these operational policy frameworks includes the safeguard policies, which are aimed specifically at managing environmental, social, and economic risks.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationreasoning

    For legal scholars doing this research, intermediate proficiency with standard software such as MS Excel and a sound grasp of key concepts and analytical tools in IT project management can be effective and cost-efficient.

    “an intermediate level of proficiency with standard software such as MS Excel as well as a sound understanding of the principles behind key theoretical concepts and analytical tools employed in an area such as IT project management, 6 for instance, can be decidedly effective -not to mention, cost efficient.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The project concluded that the issue of multilateral development bank accountability needs to be addressed through a legal-interdisciplinary approach.

    “Hence, the project concluded that the issue of 'MDB-accountability' needs to be addressed by means of a legal-interdisciplinary approach.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [68]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites [69]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites [71]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    The primary purpose of an interdisciplinary approach is solving real-world problems.

    “This article views the primary purpose of an interdisciplinary approach (or, the principle motivating factor for employing such an approach) as 'problem solving in the real world'.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Hirsch Hadorn et al.

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    Examples from Chile Pangue and Chad Petroleum show how law gains a place in transnational regulatory governance through thin procedural commitments and expands it by facilitating thick substantive commitments via the dispute resolution triad.

    “Examples such as these demonstrate how law attains its place in transnational regulatory governance contexts through 'thin' (procedural) normative commitments”
    • Also stated in: § 4.2 Developing the Database: Legal Doctrinal Analysis Supporting Data Collection and Classification · plain
      “and also how law secures and expands its place in these contexts by facilitating the realisation of 'thick' (substantive) normative commitments -notably, by means of the 'dispute resolution triad' formed between individual claimants, MDB Management (the 'respondents'), and IAMs (with Executive Board usually acting as final arbitral body).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Brunnée and Toope, above n.16, at 86

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Shapiro and Stone Sweet, above n.60

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisenone given

    MDB development-lending operations involve many state and non-state actors, including project-affected people, who participate in activities, governance structures, and processes around MDB-financed projects.

    “MDB development-lending operations 27 involve a wide range of state and non-state actors -including individuals ('project-affected people') 28 -participating (in various capacities) in the activities, governance structures, and processes surrounding development projects financed (or co-financed) by MDBs.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisereasoning

    IAMs are mandated to enforce relevant operational policy frameworks and, through fact-finding, problem-solving, compliance review, policy advice, and monitoring, to strengthen MDB management and governance.

    “These bodies are mandated to enforce the relevant operational policy frameworks and, through their functions of fact-finding, problem-solving, compliance review, policy advice, and monitoring, to strengthen the MDBs' management and governance structures.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Transdisciplinary research aims to better fit academic knowledge production to societal needs for solving, mitigating, or preventing problems.

    “which 'aims at better fitting academic knowledge production to societal needs for solving, mitigating, or preventing problems'.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Hirsch Hadorn et al.

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisereasoning

    The legal character of MDB operational policy frameworks is contested.

    “The 'legal nature' of these operational policy frameworks remains a point of contention.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Once legal researchers overcome the methodological obstacles of IAM-practice material's format and content, they intuitively know what to do with the data.

    “once legal researchers overcome the methodological obstacles presented by the particular format and content of IAM-practice material -which include an ambiguous and inconsistent use of legal terminology (by claimants, MDB management, Board of Executive Directors, and IAMs alike) 128 -they intuitively know 'what to do with the data'.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationown data

    The experience of this research project indicates that integrating legal doctrinal methods is no more or less challenging than integrating other elements.

    “the experience with this research project indicates that the integration of legal doctrinal methods does not present any more or less of a challenge than those of other elements.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Claims filed before IAMs arise from conflicts of social practice, as legal cases do, and resolving them requires interpretative techniques and principled or reasoned schemes similar to those used by courts.

    “the claims filed before IAMs 'arise out of the conflicts of social practice', 126 as is true for legal cases, and the resolution of such claims require the deployment of interpretative techniques and principled or reasoned interpretative schemes similar to those employed by courts.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [126]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites [127]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

40 of 40
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    Legal scholars are less familiar with MDB development-lending operations than with the operations of international institutions such as the United Nations.

    “nor are they as familiar with the development-lending operations of MDBs than they typically are with the operations of international institutions such as the United Nations.7”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    The project's initial dynamic hypothesis assumed that courts performing judicial review and citizen-initiated accountability mechanisms at multilateral development banks performing fact-finding and compliance review are functionally equivalent.

    “The project's initial 'dynamic hypothesis' 66 argued that there is a functional equivalence between judicial institutions executing mandates of judicial review and citizen-driven IAMs at MDBs executing mandates of fact-finding and compliance review.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    The conceptual model assumed that quasi-judicial institutions assert and expand their de facto independence and authority relative to political institutions, but not without limit, because backlash from political institutions eventually constrains further growth.

    “The model posits that (quasi-) judicial institutions assert and expand their de facto independence and authority vis-à-vis political institutions; but not indefinitely, as their actions are bound to trigger factors limiting further assertion and expansion (i.e.limiting 'growth') -such as 'backlash' from political institutions.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    The conceptual model assumed that quasi-judicial institutions fluctuate between activism and restraint, and that their survival requires incremental expansion along a general line of progression.

    “In this way, (quasi-) judicial institutions tend to fluctuate between periods of activism and restraint, but their survival ultimately requires expansion -albeit incremental expansion -along the general line of progression.91”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    The conceptual model assumed that quasi-judicial institutions assert and expand their authority relative to political institutions by developing doctrines, principled approaches, or interpretative schemes such as the margin of appreciation doctrine.

    “For example, the model conceptualises that (quasi-) judicial institutions assert and expand their authority/ power vis-à-vis political institutions by developing and employing 'doctrines', principled approaches, or interpretative schemes -such as the margin of appreciation doctrine developed by the European Court of Human Rights.93”
5 of 5

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Discussion is assigned to the wrong section

    Minor

    The text says Section 3 will discuss legal doctrinal analysis in more detail, but the dedicated discussion appears in Section 4, including its subsection on data collection and classification.

1 of 1

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 9 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [2]2. I am not alone in making this observation -see e.g. D.D. Bradlow and D. Hunter (eds.), International Financial Institutions and International Law (2010), remarking (at xxviii-xxix) that it is 'striking how little atten- tion has been paid to the international legal issues relating to the opera- tions of the International Monitory Fund, the World Bank Group, and the regional development banks …'.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Naudé Fourie, A.
Venue
Erasmus Law Review
Published
2015-12
Volume
8
Issue
3
Pages
95-110
ISSN
2210-2671 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2284617041
Cited by
58
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 46 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1
FWCI
4.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
public-domain
Locations
  • Erasmus Law Review (publishedVersion, public-domain)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • RePub (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • RePub (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Law › Legal Studies and Policies
  • Social Sciences › Law › Comparative and International Law Studies
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration
Keywords
multilateral development banks, research methodology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-01.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-01.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review