White pine management and conservation in Algonquin Park
Open accessAbstract
Logging for white and red pine originated around 1840 in the area that subsequently became Algonquin Park. This paper discusses the uniform shelterwood system for managing white pine, difficulties encountered and the maintenance of white pine in other working groups. Key words: Algonquin Park, uniform shelterwood, natural regeneration, white pine
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Over a 70-year period most of the large super-canopy white pines in Algonquin Provincial Park were logged.
“over a 70-year period most of the large super-canopy white pines in Algonquin Provincial Park were logged (Corbett 1994).”
From Adapting forestry practices to address old-growth concerns in the Great Lakes–St. Lawrence forests of Ontario (2003) · cites this paper as Corbett 1994
High-grading practices reduce the abundance of stems of high value, such as large healthy trees.
“However, high-grading practices reduce the abundance of stems of high value, such as large healthy trees.”
From Adapting forestry practices to address old-growth concerns in the Great Lakes–St. Lawrence forests of Ontario (2003) · cites this paper as Corbett 1994
The Management section (page unavailable) says that better-quality trees are retained as residuals under Algonquin Park’s shelterwood system. Searches for high-grading and selective removal of large, valuable trees found no passage addressing whether high-grading reduces their abundance. (LLM, conf=0.72)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Pinto, F. (2003) · The Forestry Chronicle · doi:10.5558/tfc79613-3 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
- Authors
- Corbett, C. M.
- Corresponding author
- Corbett, C. M.
- Venue
- The Forestry Chronicle
- Publisher
- Canadian Institute of Forestry
- Published
- 1994-08-01
- Volume
- 70
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 435-436
- ISSN
- 0015-7546 (ISSN-L)
- 1499-9315
- OpenAlex
- W2058136499
- Cited by
- 4
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- The Forestry Chronicle (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Forest Management and Policy
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Forest ecology and management
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Seedling growth and survival studies
- Keywords
- white pine, red pine, shelterwood management, natural regeneration, forest conservation, logging history, working groups, Algonquin Park
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
