The Future of Brain-Computer Interfaces: Blockchaining Your Way into a Cloudmind
Open accessAbstract
The aim of this paper is to explore the development of brain-computer interfacing and cloudminds as possible future scenarios. I describe potential applications such as selling unused brain processing cycles and the blockchaining of personality functions. The possibility of ubiquitous brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) that are continuously connected to the Internet suggests interesting options for our future selves. Questions about what it is to be human, the nature of our current existence and interaction with reality, and how things might be different could become more prominent. I examine speculative future scenarios such as digital selves and cloudmind collaborations. Applications could be adopted in tiers of advancing complexity and risk, starting with health tracking, followed by information seeking and entertainment, and finally, self-actualization. By linking brains to the Internet, BCIs could allow individuals to be more highly connectable not just to communications networks but also to other minds, and thus could enable participation in new kinds of collective applications such as a cloudmind. A cloudmind (or crowdmind) is the concept of multiple individual minds (human or machine) joined together to pursue a collaborative goal such as problem solving, idea generation, creative expression, or entertainment. The prospect of cloudminds raises questions about individual versus collective personhood. Some of the necessary conditions for individuals to feel comfortable in joining a cloudmind include privacy, security, reversibility, and retention of personal identity. Blockchain technology might be employed to orchestrate the security, automation, coordination, and credit-assignation requirements of cloudmind collaborations.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Such human B/CI systems may dramatically alter human/machine communications, carrying the promise of significant human cognitive enhancement.
“Such human B/CI systems may dramatically alter human/machine communications, carrying the promise of significant human cognitive enhancement”
From Human Brain/Cloud Interface (2019) · cites this paper as Swan, 2016
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Maslow, A. H. (1943) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0054346 · Cited by 21,563 · see citing works
Internet gaming addiction: current perspectives
Kuss, D. (2013) · Psychology Research and Behavior Management · doi:10.2147/prbm.s39476 · Cited by 498 · see citing works
How we see ourselves and how we see others
Pronin, E. (2008) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1154199 · Cited by 353 · see citing works
Building an organic computing device with multiple interconnected brains
Pais-Vieira, M., Chiuffa, G., Lebedev, M., Yadav, A., & Nicolelis, M. A. L. (2015) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep11869 · Cited by 99 · see citing works
Telepresence and Apparent Agency in Human–Robot Interaction
Takayama, L. (2015) · The Handbook of the Psychology of Communication Technology · doi:10.1002/9781118426456.ch7 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 28
- Abuhamdeh, Sami, and Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi. 2012. The importance of challenge for the enjoyment of intrinsically motivated, goal-directed activities. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 38(3): 317-30.
- Mark Siderits, Evan Thompson, and Dan Zahavi, 79-113. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Bobrow, Robert S. 2011. Evidence for a communal consciousness. Explore 7(4): 246-48.
- Case, Amber. 2016. Calm technology: Principles and patterns for non-intrusive design. Sebastopol, CA: O'Reilly Media.
- Descombes, Vincent. 2014. The institutions of meaning: A defense of anthropological holism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
- Henson, Keith. 2007. The clinic seed -Africa. Journal of Geoethical Nanotechnology 2(2): 1-6. Available at http://www.terasemjournals.org/GNJournal/GN0202/henson1.html (accessed October 18, 2016)
- Hull, David. 1980. Individuality and selection. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 11: 311-32.
- Husserl, Edmund. 2001. Logical investigations. Trans. J.N. Findlay. London: Routledge. (Orig. pub. 1900.)
- Jabczenski, Marissa. 2016. Meta debuts groundbreaking augmented reality technology at TED 2016. Company Press Release via BusinessWire. February 17. http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20160217005172/en/Meta-Debuts-Groundbreaking- Augmented-Reality-Technology-TED (accessed October 8, 2016).
- Josipovic, Zoran. 2014. Neural correlates of nondual awareness in meditation. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1307: 9-18.
- Kurzweil, Ray. 2006. The Singularity is near: When humans transcend biology. New York: Penguin.
- Lee, Suchan, Jason Yosinski, Kyrre Glette, Hod Lipson, and Jeff Clune. 2013. Evolving gaits for physical robots with the HyperNEAT Generative Encoding: The benefits of simulation. Applications of Evolutionary Computation. Berlin: Springer-Verlag. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 7835: 540-49.
- Mazzocchi, Fulvio. 2008. Complexity in biology. Exceeding the limits of reductionism and determinism using complexity theory. EMBO Reports 9(1): 10-14.
- Nordmann, Alfred. 2014. Responsible innovation, the art and craft of anticipation. Journal of Responsible Innovation 1(1): 87-98.
- Parfit, Derek. 1986. Reasons and persons. Oxford: Oxford Paperbacks.
- Pettit, Philip. 1996. The common mind: An essay on psychology, society, and politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Seo, Dongjin, Jose M. Carmena, Jan M. Rabaey, Elad Alon, and Michel M. Maharbiz. 2013. Neural dust: An ultrasonic, low power solution for chronic brain-computer interfaces. arXiv. 1307.2196 [q-bio.NC]. · arXiv
- Swan, Melanie. 2010. Multigenic condition risk assessment in direct-to-consumer genomic services. Genetics in Medicine 12(5): 279-88.
- Swan, Melanie. 2012a. DIYgenomics. Citizen Science Health Research Studies: Personal wellness and preventive medicine through collective intelligence. AAAI Symposium on Self-Tracking and Collective Intelligence for Personal Wellness. https://www.aaai.org/ocs/index.php/SSS/SSS12/paper/viewFile/4293/4681 (accessed October 8, 2016).
- Swan, Melanie. 2012b. Health 2050: The realization of personalized medicine through crowdsourcing, the quantified self, and the participatory biocitizen. Journal of Personalized Medicine 2(3): 93-118.
- Swan, Melanie. 2014b. The non-cruciality of personal identity: Immortality as possibility. In The prospect of immortality: Fifty years later, ed. Charles Tandy, 385-420, Ann Arbor, MI: Ria University Press.
- Swan, Melanie. 2015b. Blockchain: Blueprint for a new economy. Sebastopol CA: O'Reilly Media.
- Swan, Melanie. 2015c. Blockchain thinking: The brain as a DAC (decentralized autonomous corporation). Technology and Society Magazine 34(4): 41-52.
- Swan, Melanie. 2015d. Connected car: Quantified self becomes quantified car. Journal of Sensor and Actuator Networks 4(1): 2-29.
- Swan, Melanie. 2015e. Digital Simondon: The collective individuation of man and machine. "Gilbert Simondon: Media and technics." Special issue, Platform: Journal of Media and Communication 6(1): 46- 58.
- Swan, Melanie. 2015f. Nanomedicine and cognitive enhancement. Society for Brain Mapping and Therapeutics. Conference presentation, Los Angeles, CA, March 6-8. http://www.slideshare.net/lablogga/philosophy-of-cognitive-enhancement (accessed October 8, 2016).
- Tuckman, Bruce. 1965. Developmental sequence in small groups. Psychological Bulletin 63(6): 384-99.
- van Gelder, Jean-Louis, Hal E. Hershfield, and Loran F. Nordgren. 2013. Vividness of the future self predicts delinquency. Psychological Science 24(6): 974-80.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Martins, N. R. B., Angelica, A., Chakravarthy, K., Svidinenko, Y., Boehm, F. J., Opris, I., Lebedev, M. A., Swan, M., Garan, S. A., Rosenfeld, J. V., et al. (2019) · Frontiers in Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnins.2019.00112 · Cited by 91 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Swan, M.
- Affiliations
- The New School (US)
- Corresponding author
- Swan, Melanie
- ORCID
- Swan, Melanie
- Venue
- Journal of Ethics and Emerging Technologies
- Published
- 2016-10-01
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 60-81
- ISSN
- 2767-6951 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4291911425
- Cited by
- 9
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1
- FWCI
- 0.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Locations
- Journal of Ethics and Emerging Technologies (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Cybernetics and Technology in Society
- Keywords
- brain-computer interface, future scenarios, blockchain, personhood, privacy, personal identity, speculative futures, human enhancement
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review