Cited by 19Innovative Education and Learning PracticesPsychology of Development and EducationSocial Representations and Identity

An interview with Yrjö Engeström and Annalisa Sannino on activity theory

Open access
Ploettner, Joan, Tresseras, Eva·2016·Bellaterra Journal of Teaching & Learning Language & Literature

Abstract

More and more researchers in the teaching and learning of language and\nliterature are turning to activity theory as a theoretical framework. The Center\nfor Activity, Development and Learning (CRADLE, see:\nhttp://www.helsinki.fi/cradle/info.htm), earlier called Center for Research on\nActivity Theory and Developmental Work Research, at the University of\nHelsinki, is a center of reference for theoretical and methodological development\nof activity theory, and has pursued ground-breaking research based on culturalhistorical\nactivity theory (CHAT) since 1994. This multi-disciplinary research\nunit, under the guidance of Yrjö Engeström, has significantly contributed to the\ndevelopment of CHAT-based research as a globally highly regarded\nparadigm. CRADLE is oriented toward the creation of a strong research\ncommunity with high international impact, forming both a national and\ninternational hub of activity-theoretical and socio-cultural research. Research in\nCRADLE is focused on reciprocal interaction between theory and practice, and\nmuch of its investigation includes formative interventions that use, among others,\nthe Change Laboratory method, also developed in CRADLE. CRADLE works in\nclose collaboration with work organizations, educational institutions, and social\nmovements pursuing investigative developmental efforts aimed at transforming\ndysfunctional activities.\nYrjö Engeström, Professor and founder of the CRADLE research center, has\ndeveloped cultural-historical activity theory as a framework to study\ntransformations and learning processes in work activities and organizations, and\nis known for his theory of expansive learning and for the interventionist method\nof the Change Laboratory.\nAnnalisa Sannino is Academy Research Fellow at CRADLE. Her research is\nfocused on communication, cognition and learning in educational institutions and\nwork organizations. Her previous work deals with the connection between\ndiscourse and activity, and with the interventionist nature of cultural-historical\nactivity theory, exploring how specific emerging forms of agency can be\ndiscursively identified, supported and enhanced in transformation efforts within\neducational and work activities. Her current work focuses on developing\nbuilding blocks of a theory of transformative agency based on Vygotsky’s\nprinciple of double stimulation.\nJoan Ploettner and Eva Tresseras, PhD candidates in the departments of\nEducation at the Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona and the Universitat de \nBarcelona, both participated in research stays at CRADLE as part of their\ndoctoral training. They have collaborated in preparing this interview with Yrjö\nEngeström and Annalisa Sannino. The interview published in this issue was\nconducted in March, 2016.\nIn this interview, current applications of activity theory in education are\ndiscussed and future directions for activity theory based research are presented.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5565/rev/jtl3.709

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ploettner, J., & Tresseras, E.
Affiliations
  • Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (ES)
  • Universitat Internacional de Catalunya (ES)
Venue
Bellaterra Journal of Teaching & Learning Language & Literature
Published
2016-12-31
Volume
9
Issue
4
Pages
87
ISSN
2013-6196 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2595242554
Cited by
19
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1
FWCI
6.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Bellaterra Journal of Teaching & Learning Language & Literature (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Hispana (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Dipòsit Digital de Documents de la UAB (Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • RIUVic (UVic-UCC) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • RECERCAT (Consorci de Serveis Universitaris de Catalunya) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Human Factors and Ergonomics › Innovative Education and Learning Practices
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Psychology of Development and Education
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Social Representations and Identity
Keywords
cultural-historical activity theory, activity theory, expansive learning, Change Laboratory, interventionist research, language and literature teaching, agency, organizational change, work activities, theory-practice interaction, Yrjö Engeström

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review