The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Wild plants used for food by Hungarian ethnic groups living in the Carpathian Basin
Open accessAbstract
A list of plant species used for food in Hungary and among Hungarian ethnic groups of the Carpathian Basin during the 19th and 20th centuries was compiled from 71 ethnographic and ethnobotanical sources and a survey among contemporary Hungarian botanists. Species used as food, spice, beverage or occasional snacks were collected. Sources mention 236 plant species belonging to 68 families. Most wild fleshy fruits (mostly Rosa, Rubus, Cornus, Ribes, Vaccinium spp.), dry fruits and seeds (Fagus, Quercus, Corylus, Castanea, Trapa spp.), several green vegetables (e.g. Rumex, Urtica, Humulus, Chenopodiaceae spp., Ranunculus ficaria), bulbs and tubers (Lathyrus tuberosus, Helianthus tuberosus, Chaerophyllum bulbosum, Allium spp.) used for food in Europe, are also known to be consumed in Hungary. A characteristic feature of Hungarian plant use was the mass consumption of the underground parts of several marsh (e.g. Typha, Phragmites, Sagittaria, Alisma, Butomus, Bolboschoenus spp., as well as the endemic Armoracia macrocarpa) and steppe species (e.g. Crambe tataria, Rumex pseudonatronatus). Consuming wild food plants is still important among Hungarians living in Transylvania: even nowadays more than 40 species are gathered and used at some locations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Plant identification credibility in ethnobotany: A closer look at Polish ethnographic studies
Łuczaj, Ł. J. (2010) · Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine · doi:10.1186/1746-4269-6-36 · Cited by 116 · cited 1×
“Such misidentifications are unfortunately typical in a part of the ethnography literature, nevertheless a good botanical knowledge, the descriptions of the plants discussed (if supplied), and the comparison of the different sources can effectively help to correct misidentifications [79].”
Background
Cited by
An ethnobotanical perspective on traditional fermented plant foods and beverages in Eastern Europe
Sõukand, R., Pieroni, A., Biró, M., Dénes, A., Dogan, Y., Hajdari, A., Kalle, R., Reade, B., Mustafa, B., Nedelcheva, A., et al. (2015) · Journal of Ethnopharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.jep.2015.05.018 · Cited by 409
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Dénes, A., Papp, N., Babai, D., Czúcz, B., & Molnár, Z.
- Venue
- Acta Societatis Botanicorum Poloniae
- Publisher
- Polish Botanical Society
- Published
- 2012
- Volume
- 81
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 381-396
- ISSN
- 0001-6977 (ISSN-L)
- 2083-9480
- OpenAlex
- W2056824032
- Cited by
- 564
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 10.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Wild plants used for food by Hungarian ethnic groups living in the Carpathian Basin. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5586/asbp.2012.040
- The paper
- Dénes, A., Papp, N., Babai, D., Czúcz, B., & Molnár, Z. (2012). Wild plants used for food by Hungarian ethnic groups living in the Carpathian Basin. Acta Societatis Botanicorum Poloniae. https://doi.org/10.5586/asbp.2012.040
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.