CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 120Tuberculosis Research and EpidemiologyPoverty, Education, and Child WelfareHIV, TB, and STIs Epidemiology

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 29 of the 29 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Innovative Socio-economic Interventions Against Tuberculosis (ISIAT) project: an operational assessment

Open access
Rocha, C., Montoya, R., Zevallos, K., Curatola, A., Ynga, W., Franco, J., Fernandez, F., Becerra, N., Sabaduche, M., Tovar, M. A., Ramos, E., Tapley, A., Allen, N. R., Onifade, D. A., Acosta, C. D., Maritz, M., Concha, D. F., Schumacher, S. G., Evans, C. A.·2011·The International Journal of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease
DOI 10.5588/ijtld.10.0447PMC PMC3160483
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

SETTING: Tuberculosis (TB) affected households in impoverished shantytowns, Lima, Peru. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate socio-economic interventions for strengthening TB control by improving uptake of TB care and prevention services. DESIGN: Barriers to TB control were characterised by interviews with TB-affected families. To reduce these barriers, a multidisciplinary team offered integrated community and household socio-economic interventions aiming to: 1) enhance uptake of TB care by education, community mobilisation and psychosocial support; and 2) reduce poverty through food and cash transfers, microcredit, microenterprise and vocational training. An interim analysis was performed after the socio-economic interventions had been provided for 2078 people in 311 households of newly diagnosed TB patients for up to 34 months. RESULTS: Poverty (46% earned <US$1 per day), depression (40%), stigmatisation (77%), and perceived isolation (39%) were common among TB patients (all P < 0.05 vs. non-patients). The project had 100% recruitment, and involved 97% of TB-affected households in regular visits, 71% in community groups, 78% in psychosocial support and 77% in poverty-reduction interventions. The socio-economic interventions were associated with increases in household contact TB screening (from 82% to 96%); successful TB treatment completion (from 91% to 97%); patient human immunodeficiency virus testing (from 31% to 97%); and completion of preventive therapy (from 27% to 87%; all P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Socio-economic interventions can strengthen TB control activities. KEYWORDS: tuberculosis; control; microcredit; poverty;social determinants.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5588/ijtld.10.0447

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [1]Hanson C Tuberculosis, poverty and inequity: a review of the literature and discussion of issues 2002 World Bank Washington DC, USA

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 120

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Rocha, C., Montoya, R., Zevallos, K., Curatola, A., Ynga, W., Franco, J., Fernandez, F., Becerra, N., Sabaduche, M., Tovar, M. A., Ramos, E., Tapley, A., Allen, N. R., Onifade, D. A., Acosta, C. D., Maritz, M., Concha, D. F., Schumacher, S. G., & Evans, C. A.
Affiliations
  • Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia (PE)
  • Prisma (PE)
  • IFHAD: Innovation For Health And Development, London, UK; Asociación Benéfica Prisma, Lima, Peru
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
ORCID
Venue
The International Journal of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease
Publisher
International Union Against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease
Published
2011-06-01
Volume
15
Issue
6
Pages
50-57
ISSN
1027-3719 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.5588/ijtld.10.0447
PMC
PMC3160483
OpenAlex
W1991275886
Cited by
120
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 4
FWCI
5.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The International Journal of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Wellcome Trust (057434)
  • Government of the United Kingdom
  • Sir Halley Stewart Trust
  • Department for International Development
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Tuberculosis Research and Epidemiology
  • Social Sciences › Development › Poverty, Education, and Child Welfare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › HIV, TB, and STIs Epidemiology
Keywords
tuberculosis control, socioeconomic interventions, poverty, informal settlements, TB stigma, depression, psychosocial support, community mobilization, tuberculosis screening, TB treatment completion, HIV testing, prophylaxis, microcredit, microenterprises, vocational education, Lima
MeSH terms
Communicable Disease Control, Developing Countries, Financial Management, Health Promotion, Health Services Accessibility, Humans, Income, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Nutritional Status, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Patient Education as Topic, Peru, Poverty Areas, Risk Factors, Social Support, Socioeconomic Factors, Time Factors, Tuberculosis, Vocational Education, Program Evaluation, Health Behavior, Health Care Costs, Risk Assessment, Community Networks, Small Business

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review