Cited by 420Infection Control and VentilationIndoor Air Quality and Microbial ExposureInfection Control in Healthcare

Natural Ventilation for the Prevention of Airborne Contagion

Open access
Escombe, A. Roderick, Oeser, Clarissa C, Gilman, Robert H, Navincopa, Marcos, Ticona, Eduardo, Pan, William, Martínez, Carlos, Chacaltana, Jesus +4 more·2007·PLoS Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Institutional transmission of airborne infections such as tuberculosis (TB) is an important public health problem, especially in resource-limited settings where protective measures such as negative-pressure isolation rooms are difficult to implement. Natural ventilation may offer a low-cost alternative. Our objective was to investigate the rates, determinants, and effects of natural ventilation in health care settings. METHODS AND FINDINGS: The study was carried out in eight hospitals in Lima, Peru; five were hospitals of "old-fashioned" design built pre-1950, and three of "modern" design, built 1970-1990. In these hospitals 70 naturally ventilated clinical rooms where infectious patients are likely to be encountered were studied. These included respiratory isolation rooms, TB wards, respiratory wards, general medical wards, outpatient consulting rooms, waiting rooms, and emergency departments. These rooms were compared with 12 mechanically ventilated negative-pressure respiratory isolation rooms built post-2000. Ventilation was measured using a carbon dioxide tracer gas technique in 368 experiments. Architectural and environmental variables were measured. For each experiment, infection risk was estimated for TB exposure using the Wells-Riley model of airborne infection. We found that opening windows and doors provided median ventilation of 28 air changes/hour (ACH), more than double that of mechanically ventilated negative-pressure rooms ventilated at the 12 ACH recommended for high-risk areas, and 18 times that with windows and doors closed (p < 0.001). Facilities built more than 50 years ago, characterised by large windows and high ceilings, had greater ventilation than modern naturally ventilated rooms (40 versus 17 ACH; p < 0.001). Even within the lowest quartile of wind speeds, natural ventilation exceeded mechanical (p < 0.001). The Wells-Riley airborne infection model predicted that in mechanically ventilated rooms 39% of susceptible individuals would become infected following 24 h of exposure to untreated TB patients of infectiousness characterised in a well-documented outbreak. This infection rate compared with 33% in modern and 11% in pre-1950 naturally ventilated facilities with windows and doors open. CONCLUSIONS: Opening windows and doors maximises natural ventilation so that the risk of airborne contagion is much lower than with costly, maintenance-requiring mechanical ventilation systems. Old-fashioned clinical areas with high ceilings and large windows provide greatest protection. Natural ventilation costs little and is maintenance free, and is particularly suited to limited-resource settings and tropical climates, where the burden of TB and institutional TB transmission is highest. In settings where respiratory isolation is difficult and climate permits, windows and doors should be opened to reduce the risk of airborne contagion.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pmed.0040068

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Indoors, infectious airborne viral particles can accumulate, putting everyone in the room at risk of infection, unless indoor air is continuously replaced with outdoor air.

    “Indoors, infectious airborne viral particles can accumulate, putting everyone in the room at risk of infection, unless indoor air is continuously replaced with outdoor air (36).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Escombe, A. R., Oeser, C. C., Gilman, R. H., Navincopa, M., Ticona, E., Pan, W., Martínez, C., Chacaltana, J., Rodríguez, R., Moore, D. A. J., Friedland, J. S., & Evans, C. A.
Affiliations
  • Prisma (PE)
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • Hospital Nacional Dos de Mayo (PE)
  • Imperial College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Escombe, A. Roderick
Venue
PLoS Medicine
Published
2007-02-27
Volume
4
Issue
2
Pages
e68
ISSN
  • 1549-1277 (ISSN-L)
  • 1549-1676
OpenAlex
W2143196261
Cited by
420
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 30 · 2021: 39 · 2020: 34 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 24 · 2012: 19
FWCI
21.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • St George's Online Research Archive (St George's University of London) (acceptedVersion)
  • LSHTM Research Online (London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine) (acceptedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Spiral (Imperial College London) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • United States Agency for International Development (GHS-A-00-03-00019-00, HRN-5986-A-00-6006-00)
  • Alexander and Margaret Stewart Trust
  • Wellcome Trust
  • Sir Halley Stewart Trust
  • National Institutes of Health
  • U.S. Public Health Service (T35A107646)
  • National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Infection Control and Ventilation
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Indoor Air Quality and Microbial Exposure
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Infection Control in Healthcare
Keywords
natural ventilation, airborne transmission, tuberculosis, negative pressure isolation rooms, mechanical ventilation, Wells-Riley model, hospital architecture, infection risk, institutional transmission, resource-limited settings, tropical climate, Lima, hospital wards, emergency department, waiting rooms, wind speed
MeSH terms
Air Microbiology, Cross Infection, Hospital Design and Construction, Hospitals, Humans, Peru, Tuberculosis, Ventilation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review