Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 279

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 21 of the 21 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Lidar remote sensing of biophysical properties of tolerant northern hardwood forests

Lim, Kevin, Treitz, Paul, Baldwin, Ken, Morrison, Ian, Green, Jim·2003·Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing

Abstract

Previous forest research using time-of-flight lidar data has primarily focused on forest ecosystems with conifers as the predominant tree type. In this study, small-footprint time-of-flight lidar data were used to estimate biophysical properties of tolerant hardwood forests composed predominantly of mature sugar maple (Acer saccharum Marsh.) and yellow birch (Betula alleghaniensis Britton) in the Turkey Lakes Watershed (TLW) near Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario. Ground reference data were collected during the first two weeks of July 2000 for 49 circular sample plots, each 0.04 ha (or 400 m2) in area. Lidar data were acquired on 24 August 2000 using an Optech ALTM 1225 (Optech Incorporated, Toronto, Ont.). Ten biophysical forest metrics were derived for each plot: (1) maximum tree height (hmax), (2) Lorey's mean tree height (hLorey), (3) mean diameter at breast height (DBH), (4) total basal area (BA), (5) percent canopy openness (CO%), (6) leaf area index (LAI), (7) ellipsoidal crown closure (CC), (8) total aboveground biomass (BIO), (9) total wood volume (VOL), and (10) stem density (SD). Likewise, three laser height metrics were derived for each plot: (1) maximum laser height (Lhmax), (2) mean laser height (Lhmean), and (3) mean laser height calculated from lidar returns filtered based on a threshold applied to the intensity return values (LhIR). The results demonstrate that for each forest with a given stand structure, there exists one or more laser height metrics derived from lidar data that are capable of providing an estimate of various biophysical properties. Lhmax was the best estimator of hmax (r2 = 0.79) and hLorey (r2 = 0.87); LhIR was the best estimator of BA (r2 = 0.85), BIO (r2 = 0.85), and VOL (r2 = 0.87); and Lhmean was the best estimator of CC (r2 = 0.89), DBH (r2 = 0.63), CO% (r2 = 0.76), LAI (r2 = 0.80), and SD (r2 = 0.86). The results illustrate the potential for laser height metrics to estimate (i) plot heights and stem densities, (ii) aboveground biomass and volume, and (iii) canopy-related measures.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5589/m03-025

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 21 references

Cited by

See all 279

Metadata

Authors
Lim, K., Treitz, P., Baldwin, K., Morrison, I., & Green, J.
Venue
Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing
Published
2003-10
Volume
29
Issue
5
Pages
658-678
ISSN
  • 0703-8992 (ISSN-L)
  • 1712-7971
OpenAlex
W2042832944
Cited by
279
References
21
FWCI
17.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Lidar remote sensing of biophysical properties of tolerant northern hardwood forests. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5589/m03-025
The paper
Lim, K., Treitz, P., Baldwin, K., Morrison, I., & Green, J. (2003). Lidar remote sensing of biophysical properties of tolerant northern hardwood forests. Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing. https://doi.org/10.5589/m03-025

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.