The DOI matches its Crossref record; 21 of the 21 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Lidar remote sensing of biophysical properties of tolerant northern hardwood forests
Abstract
Previous forest research using time-of-flight lidar data has primarily focused on forest ecosystems with conifers as the predominant tree type. In this study, small-footprint time-of-flight lidar data were used to estimate biophysical properties of tolerant hardwood forests composed predominantly of mature sugar maple (Acer saccharum Marsh.) and yellow birch (Betula alleghaniensis Britton) in the Turkey Lakes Watershed (TLW) near Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario. Ground reference data were collected during the first two weeks of July 2000 for 49 circular sample plots, each 0.04 ha (or 400 m2) in area. Lidar data were acquired on 24 August 2000 using an Optech ALTM 1225 (Optech Incorporated, Toronto, Ont.). Ten biophysical forest metrics were derived for each plot: (1) maximum tree height (hmax), (2) Lorey's mean tree height (hLorey), (3) mean diameter at breast height (DBH), (4) total basal area (BA), (5) percent canopy openness (CO%), (6) leaf area index (LAI), (7) ellipsoidal crown closure (CC), (8) total aboveground biomass (BIO), (9) total wood volume (VOL), and (10) stem density (SD). Likewise, three laser height metrics were derived for each plot: (1) maximum laser height (Lhmax), (2) mean laser height (Lhmean), and (3) mean laser height calculated from lidar returns filtered based on a threshold applied to the intensity return values (LhIR). The results demonstrate that for each forest with a given stand structure, there exists one or more laser height metrics derived from lidar data that are capable of providing an estimate of various biophysical properties. Lhmax was the best estimator of hmax (r2 = 0.79) and hLorey (r2 = 0.87); LhIR was the best estimator of BA (r2 = 0.85), BIO (r2 = 0.85), and VOL (r2 = 0.87); and Lhmean was the best estimator of CC (r2 = 0.89), DBH (r2 = 0.63), CO% (r2 = 0.76), LAI (r2 = 0.80), and SD (r2 = 0.86). The results illustrate the potential for laser height metrics to estimate (i) plot heights and stem densities, (ii) aboveground biomass and volume, and (iii) canopy-related measures.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Maximum Likelihood from Incomplete Data Via the EM Algorithm
Dempster, A. P., Laird, N. M., & Rubin, D. B. (1977) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1977.tb01600.x · Cited by 50,444
Beckman, R. J. (1987) · Technometrics · doi:10.1080/00401706.1987.10488195 · Cited by 2,835
Næsset, E. (2002) · Remote Sensing of Environment · doi:10.1016/s0034-4257(01)00290-5 · Cited by 1,430
Airborne laser scanning—an introduction and overview
Wehr, A., & Lohr, U. (1999) · ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1016/s0924-2716(99)00011-8 · Cited by 1,414
Determination of terrain models in wooded areas with airborne laser scanner data
Kraus, K., & Pfeifer, N. (1998) · ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1016/s0924-2716(98)00009-4 · Cited by 1,218
LiDAR remote sensing of forest structure
Lim, K., Treitz, P., Wulder, M., St-Onge, B., & Flood, M. (2003) · Progress in Physical Geography: Earth and Environment · doi:10.1191/0309133303pp360ra · Cited by 1,103
Self-citationA comparison between photogrammetry and laser scanning
Baltsavias, E. P. (1999) · ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1016/s0924-2716(99)00014-3 · Cited by 771
Detecting and measuring individual trees using an airborne laser scanner
Persson, Å., Holmgren, J., & Söderman, U. (2002) · Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing · Cited by 713
Determination of mean tree height of forest stands using airborne laser scanner data
Næsset, E. (1997) · ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1016/s0924-2716(97)83000-6 · Cited by 604
Estimating timber volume of forest stands using airborne laser scanner data
Næsset, E. (1997) · Remote Sensing of Environment · doi:10.1016/s0034-4257(97)00041-2 · Cited by 543
Cited by
Correction of laser scanning intensity data: Data and model-driven approaches
Höfle, B., & Pfeifer, N. (2007) · ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2007.05.008 · Cited by 558
Practical large-scale forest stand inventory using a small-footprint airborne scanning laser
Næsset, E. (2004) · Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research · doi:10.1080/02827580310019257 · Cited by 553
Generating pit-free canopy height models from airborne lidar
Khosravipour, A., Skidmore, A. K., Isenburg, M., Wang, T., & Hussin, Y. A. (2014) · Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing · doi:10.14358/pers.80.9.863 · Cited by 347
Lidar remote sensing of forest biomass: A scale-invariant estimation approach using airborne lasers
Zhao, K., Popescu, S., & Nelson, R. (2009) · Remote Sensing of Environment · doi:10.1016/j.rse.2008.09.009 · Cited by 346
Clark, M. L., Clark, D. B., & Roberts, D. A. (2004) · Remote Sensing of Environment · doi:10.1016/j.rse.2004.02.008 · Cited by 323
Metadata
- Authors
- Lim, K., Treitz, P., Baldwin, K., Morrison, I., & Green, J.
- Venue
- Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2003-10
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 658-678
- ISSN
- 0703-8992 (ISSN-L)
- 1712-7971
- OpenAlex
- W2042832944
- Cited by
- 279
- References
- 21
- FWCI
- 17.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Lidar remote sensing of biophysical properties of tolerant northern hardwood forests. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5589/m03-025
- The paper
- Lim, K., Treitz, P., Baldwin, K., Morrison, I., & Green, J. (2003). Lidar remote sensing of biophysical properties of tolerant northern hardwood forests. Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing. https://doi.org/10.5589/m03-025
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.