Cited by 73Plant Pathogens and Fungal DiseasesPlant Disease Resistance and GeneticsYeasts and Rust Fungi Studies

Colletotrichum: species, ecology and interactions

Open access
Damm, Ulrike, Baroncelli, Riccardo, Cai, Lei, Kubo, Yasuyuki, O’Connell, Richard, Weir, Bevan, Yoshino, Kae, Cannon, Paul F.·2010·IMA Fungus

Abstract

The presentations of the Special Interest Group meeting Colletotrichum: species, ecology and interactions, held on 1 August 2010 during IMC9 in Edinburgh, UK, are outlined. Seven research projects, ranged from systematics and population genetics to host-pathogen interactions and genome projects were presented. The meeting revealed that currently major species complexes in the genus Colletotrichum are being revised and the identities of many pathogens clarified on the basis of molecular phylogenies, and that the genomes of four species are sequenced and decoded providing an enormous amount of data that are used to increase our understanding of the biology of Colletotrichum species.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5598/imafungus.2010.01.02.08

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Prior work indicates that ITS sequence data alone cannot reliably identify species and that at least two to three genetic loci, such as GAPDH, ACT, and TUB2, are needed to differentiate accurately within the C. gloeosporioides complex.

    “Previous studies highlighted the limitation of relying solely on ITS sequence data for species identification and emphasized the need to use at least 2 to 3 genetic loci (such as GAPDH, ACT, TUB2) for accurate differentiation within the C. gloeosporioides species complex (Damm et al. 2010;Weir et al. 2012).”

    From Antifungal Potential of Chitosan and Phenyllactic Acid against Colletotrichum gloeosporioides, the Anthracnose Pathogen in Avocados (2025) · cites this paper as Damm et al. 2010

    The Introduction’s “Systematics and identification” section describes distinct members of the C. gloeosporioides complex as having similar ITS sequences and reports successful species delimitation using eight genes, as well as a five-gene analysis. This supports the limitation of ITS alone and the value of multilocus analysis, but it does not establish that two to three loci suffice or specify GAPDH, ACT, and TUB2 for that purpose. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The C. gloeosporioides isolate examined in this study was closely related to three other species in the C. gloeosporioides complex: C. fructicola, C. aenigma, and C. siamense, based on morphology and ITS sequences.

    “In this study, C. gloeosporioides exhibited a close relationship with other Colletotrichum species such as C. fructicola, C. aenigma, and C. siamense, all of which are classified within the C. gloeosporioides species complex (Weir et al. 2012) due to their similar morphology and ITS sequences (Damm et al. 2010).”

    From Antifungal Potential of Chitosan and Phenyllactic Acid against Colletotrichum gloeosporioides, the Anthracnose Pathogen in Avocados (2025) · cites this paper as Damm et al. 2010

    The Systematics and identification section (page not specified) says the C. gloeosporioides sensu lato complex is grouped by similar conidial morphology and ITS sequences, and it lists C. fructicola and C. siamense among its members. It does not mention C. aenigma or examine the citing study’s isolate, so it cannot support the full species-specific relationship claimed. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 13

  1. Ané C Larget B Baum DA Smith SD Rokas A (2007) Bayesian estimation of concordance among gene trees. Molecular Biology and Evolution 24: 412– 426 17095535
  2. Asakura M Ninomiya S Sugimoto M Oku M Yamashita S Okuno T Sakai Y Takano Y (2009) Atg26-Mediated Pexophagy Is Required for Host Invasion by the Plant Pathogenic Fungus Colletotrichum orbiculare. Plant Cell 21: 1291– 1304 19363139 PMC2685618
  3. Crouch JA Clarke BB White JW Hillman BI (2009a) Systematic analysis of the falcate-spored graminicolous Colletotrichum and a description of six new species of the fungus from warm-season grasses. Mycologia 101: 717– 732 19750952
  4. Fujihara N Sakaguchi A Tanaka S Fujii S Tsuji G Shiraishi T O’Connell R Kubo Y (2010) Peroxisome biogenesis factor PEX13 is required for appressorium-mediated plant infection by the anthracnose fungus Colletotrichum orbiculare. Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions 23: 436– 445 20192831
  5. Kimura A Takano Y Furusawa I Okuno T (2001) Peroxisomal Metabolic Function Is Required for Appressorium-Mediated Plant Infection by Colletotrichum lagenarium. Plant Cell 13: 1945– 1957 11487704 PMC139132
  6. Lubbe CM Denman S Cannon PF Groenewald JZ Lamprecht SC Crous PW (2004) Characterization of Colletotrichum species associated with diseases of Proteaceae. Mycologia 96: 1268– 1279 21148951
  7. O’Connell R Herbert C Sreenivasaprasad S Khatib M Esquerré-Tugayé M-T Dumas B (2004) A novel Arabidopsis-Colletotrichum pathosystem for the molecular dissection of plant-fungal interactions. Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions 17: 272– 282 15000394
  8. Perfect SE Hughes HB O’Connell RJ Green JR (1999) Colletotrichum: a model genus for studies on pathology and fungal–plant interactions. Fungal Genetics and Biology 27: 186– 198 10441444
  9. Sreenivasaprasad S Talhinhas P (2005) Genotypic and phenotypic diversity in Colletotrichum acutatum, a cosmopolitan pathogen causing anthracnose on a wide range of hosts. Molecular Plant Pathology 6: 361– 378 20565664
  10. Takano Y Kubo Y Kuroda I Furusawa I (1997) Temporal transcriptional pattern of three melanin biosynthesis genes, PKS1, SCD1, and THR1, in appressorium-differentiating and nondifferentiating conidia of Colletotrichum lagenarium. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 63: 351– 354 16535499 PMC1389113
  11. Tanaka S Ishihama N Yoshioka H Huser A O’Connell R Tsuji G Tsuge S Kubo Y (2009) Colletotrichum orbiculare ssd1 mutant enhances plant basal resistance through activation of a mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway. Plant Cell 21: 2517– 2526 19706796 PMC2751964
  12. Tsuji G Fujii S Fujihara N Hirose C Tsuge S Shiraishi T Kubo Y (2003) Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated transformation for random insertional mutagenesis in Colletotrichum lagenarium. Journal of General Plant Pathology 69: 230– 239
  13. Wikee S Cai L Pairin N McKenzie EHC Su Y-Y Chukeatirote E Thi HN Bahkali AH Moslem MA Abdelsalam K Hyde KD (2010) Colletotrichum species from Jasmine (Jasminum sambac). Fungal Diversity: DOI 10.1007/s13225-010-0049-x. · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Authors
Damm, U., Baroncelli, R., Cai, L., Kubo, Y., O’Connell, R., Weir, B., Yoshino, K., & Cannon, P. F.
Affiliations
  • Westerdijk Fungal Biodiversity Institute (NL)
  • University of Warwick (GB)
  • Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
  • Kyoto Prefectural University (JP)
  • Max Planck Institute for Plant Breeding Research (DE)
  • Kyoto University (JP)
  • CAB International (GB)
Corresponding author
Damm, Ulrike
Venue
IMA Fungus
Published
2010-11-23
Volume
1
Issue
2
Pages
161-165
ISSN
  • 2210-6340 (ISSN-L)
  • 2210-6359
OpenAlex
W2059252148
Cited by
73
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 6
FWCI
2.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IMA Fungus (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • KNAW Research Portal (The Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
  • Archivio istituzionale della ricerca (Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna) (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • KNAW research portal (Royal Academy of Art and Sciences (KNAW)) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant Disease Resistance and Genetics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Yeasts and Rust Fungi Studies
Keywords
Colletotrichum, species complex, molecular phylogeny, population genetics, host-pathogen interaction, fungal genomics, fungal taxonomy, plant pathogens, fungal ecology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review