Cited by 11Medical Imaging Techniques and ApplicationsRadiopharmaceutical Chemistry and ApplicationsLung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment

18F-FDGPET/CT: diabetes and hyperglycaemia

Open access
Niccoli-Asabella, Artor, Iuele, Francesca Iuele, Merenda, Nunzio, Pisani, Antonio Rosario, Notaristefano, Antonio, Rubini, Giuseppe·2013·Nuclear Medicine Review

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Some patients who undergo 18F-FDG PET/CTfor neoplastic or benign disease are also affected by diabetes or hyperglycaemia. We propose different preparation procedures inpatients (pts) with hyperglycaemia (acute, temporary or chronic)or diabetes (type 1 or 2) at the time of the 18F-FDG injection, in order to improve the diagnostic scheduling of 18F-FDG PET/CT. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We evaluated a sample of 13,063 pts, examined in two different PET/CT centres, one with a stationary scanner (94.4%) and the other with a mobile device (5.6%). High blood sugar was present in 1,698 patients (13%) at the time of the 18F-FDG injection (hyperglycaemia was defined as fasting blood glucose > 11.1 mmol/l). We considered all 18F-FDG PET/CT tests performed over a period of 4 years (2006-2009). In the first 2 years (6,236 tests), scheduling was done directly by the administrative secretary. In the next two years, 6,827 pts underwent a preliminary visit to assess the test indications, medical history, and therapy as well as pre-test preparation. We evaluated different preparation protocols for hyperglycaemic or diabetic pts, especially those recommended in the guidelines of the European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM) and Society of Nuclear Medicine (SNM). RESULTS: In the four-year period, 713/13,063 patients (5.45%)were rescheduled; of these, 78.8% were rescheduled in the two years before the implementation of our preparation protocols and 21.2% in the next two years.Before the implementation of our preparation protocols, 562 patients (9%) presented occasional, acute or chronic hyperglycaemia (56.7%), or diabetes (43.3%), requiring postponement of the test to a later date. The test was not performed in 17 of 6,236 pts (0.27%) because of blood glucose levels above 11.1 mmol/l for several days, while in 16/6236 pts (0.26%) the18F-FDG injection was performed despite high blood glucose levels, in view of the clinical urgency.After the implementation of the preparation protocols, 2.2% of pts were rescheduled because of occasional, acute or chronic hyperglycaemia (79%), or diabetes (21%); 0.1% of pts did not undergo the test because of chronic high blood glucose levels. Although the administration of insulin is recommended in theEANM and SNM guidelines, in our new preparation procedures experience it was not necessary, because we reduced the numbers of hyperglycaemic pts thanks to screening at the preliminary visit and a subsequent good preparation of the patient before scheduling. CONCLUSIONS: The application of our preparation protocols improves the on-time performance and diagnostic accuracy,and increases patients' compliance.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5603/nmr.2013.0035

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 10

  1. [1]1. Hahn T, Hofmann W, Reich O, Lang I, Desoye G. Hyperglycaemia regu- lates the glucose-transport system of clonal choriocarcinoma cells in vitro. A potential molecular mechanism contributing to the adjunct of glucose in tumour therapy. Int J Cancer 1998; 78: 353-360.
  2. [5]5. Clement S, Braithwaite SS, Magee MF et al. American Diabetes Associa- tion Diabetes in Hospital Writing Committee. Management of Diabetes and Hyperglycaemia in Hospitals. Diabetes Care 2004 Feb; 27(2): 553-91
  3. [6]6. Niccoli Asabella A, Notaristefano A, Pisani AR, Iuele F, Altini C, Rubini G. Different causes of 18-Fluorine-labelled-2-deoxy-2-fl uoro-D-glucose uptake in a patient with non-Hodgkin lymphoma Gazzetta Medica Italiana Archivio per le Scienze Mediche 2012; 171: 351-356.
  4. [10]10. Delbeke D, Coleman RE, Guiberteau MJ et al. Procedure guideline for tumour imaging with 18F-FDG PET/CT 1.0. J Nucl Med 2006;47: 885-895.
  5. [17]17. Langen KJ, Braun U, Rota Kops E et al. The infl uence of plasma glucose levels on fl uorine-18-fl uorodeoxyglucose uptake in bronchial carcinomas. J Nucl Med 1993; 34: 355-359.
  6. [18]18. Torizuka T, Zasadny KR, Wahl RL. Diabetes decreases FDG accumulation in primary lung cancer. Clin Positron Imaging 1999; 2: 281-287.
  7. [22]22. fl uoro-D-glucose injection following I.v. Insulin in diabetic patients. Mol Imaging Biol 2006; 8: 348-354.
  8. [23]23. Roy FN, Beaulier S, Boucher L, Bourdeau I, Cohade C. Impact of intra- venous insulin on 18F-FDG PET in diabetic cancer patients. J Nucl Med 2009; 50: 178-183.
  9. [25]25. Dasgeb B, Siegel E. Alteration of FDG uptake associated with metformin: pitfall and opportunity. J Nucl Med. 2007; 48: 184P.
  10. [28]28. Minn H, Nuutila P, Lindholm P et al. In vivo effects of insulin on tumour and skeletal muscle glucose metabolism in patients with lymphoma. Cancer 1994; 73: 1490-1498.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Niccoli-Asabella, A., Iuele, F. I., Merenda, N., Pisani, A. R., Notaristefano, A., & Rubini, G.
Affiliations
University of Bari Aldo Moro (IT)
Corresponding author
Rubini, Giuseppe
Venue
Nuclear Medicine Review
Published
2013-08-13
Volume
16
Issue
2
Pages
57-61
ISSN
  • 1506-9680 (ISSN-L)
  • 1644-4345
OpenAlex
W2169423973
Cited by
11
References
24
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1
FWCI
0.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nuclear Medicine Review (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • CINECA IRIS Institutional Research Information System (University of Bari Aldo Moro) (submittedVersion)
  • INFM-OAR (INFN Catania) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Radiopharmaceutical Chemistry and Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Keywords
18F-FDG PET/CT, hyperglycemia, diabetes mellitus, glycemic control, type 1 diabetes, type 2 diabetes, fasting blood glucose, false positives, image quality
MeSH terms
Humans, Hyperglycemia, Lung Neoplasms, Tomography, X-Ray Computed, Fluorodeoxyglucose F18, Diabetes Complications, Positron-Emission Tomography, Multimodal Imaging

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review