The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Indian Journal of Traditional Knowledge
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Developing the medicinal plants sector in northern India: challenges and opportunities
Kala, C. P., Dhyani, P. P., & Sajwan, B. S. (2006) · Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine · doi:10.1186/1746-4269-2-32 · Cited by 431
Medicinal plants, traditional medicine, markets and management in far-west Nepal
Kunwar, R. M., Mahat, L., Acharya, R. P., & Bussmann, R. W. (2013) · Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine · doi:10.1186/1746-4269-9-24 · Cited by 403
Ethnobotanical investigations among tribes in Madurai District of Tamil Nadu (India)
Ignacimuthu, S., Ayyanar, M., & Sivaraman K, S. (2006) · Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine · doi:10.1186/1746-4269-2-25 · Cited by 362
Theories and Major Hypotheses in Ethnobotany
Gaoue, O. G., Coe, M. A., Bond, M., Hart, G., Seyler, B. C., & McMillen, H. (2017) · Economic Botany · doi:10.1007/s12231-017-9389-8 · Cited by 322
Why study the use of animal products in traditional medicines?
Alves, R. R., & Rosa, I. L. (2005) · Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine · doi:10.1186/1746-4269-1-5 · Cited by 320
Mijatović, D., Van Oudenhoven, F., Eyzaguirre, P., & Hodgkin, T. (2013) · International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability · doi:10.1080/14735903.2012.691221 · Cited by 192
Assistant Professor, D. O. B., Sureshbabu, P., Ramakrishna, N., & Department of Botany, S. C. (2018) · Journal of Scientific and Innovative Research · doi:10.31254/jsir.2018.7403 · Cited by 5
Metadata
- Venue
- Indian Journal of Traditional Knowledge
- Published
- 2022-08-08
- ISSN
- 0972-5938 (ISSN-L)
- 0975-1068
- OpenAlex
- W4290633183
- Cited by
- 1,656
- References
- 0
- Type
- paratext
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.