The DOI matches its Crossref record; 100 of the 100 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Theories and Major Hypotheses in Ethnobotany
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Granovetter, M. S. (1973) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/225469 · Cited by 40,491
Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications
Wasserman, S. S., & Faust, K. (1994) · Cited by 17,962
Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications
Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1994) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511815478 · Cited by 17,557 · cited 1×
“…theory is increasingly used in various disciplines to document the interplay between natural systems and human knowledge systems, including the distribution and dissemination/ preservation of ethnobotanical knowledge within societies (Crona and Bodin 2006; Hopkins 2011; Wasserman and Faust 1994).”
BackgroundOptimal foraging, the marginal value theorem
Charnov, E. L. (1976) · Theoretical Population Biology · doi:10.1016/0040-5809(76)90040-x · Cited by 5,374
Resource Availability and Plant Antiherbivore Defense
Coley, P. D., Bryant, J. P., & Chapin, F. S. (1985) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.230.4728.895 · Cited by 3,967
Mediterranean journal of social sciences
(2020) · Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences · doi:10.5901/mjss · Cited by 3,221
Journal of environmental management
(1973) · Environmental Pollution (1970) · doi:10.1016/0013-9327(73)90062-1 · Cited by 2,461
Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine
(2022) · Evidence-based Complementary and Alternative Medicine · doi:10.1155/4747 · Cited by 2,409
Plant Apparency and Chemical Defense
Feeny, P. (1976) · Biochemical Interaction Between Plants and Insects · doi:10.1007/978-1-4684-2646-5_1 · Cited by 2,344
A note on trophic complexity and community stability.
Paine, R. T. (1969) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/282586 · Cited by 1,796
Cited by
Eighty-four per cent of all Amazonian arboreal plant individuals are useful to humans
Coelho, S. D., Levis, C., Baccaro, F. B., Figueiredo, F. O. G., Pinassi Antunes, A., ter Steege, H., Peña-Claros, M., Clement, C. R., & Schietti, J. (2021) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0257875 · Cited by 34
Suárez, M. E. (2019) · Journal of Ethnopharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.jep.2018.10.026 · Cited by 31
Metadata
- Authors
- Gaoue, O. G., Coe, M. A., Bond, M., Hart, G., Seyler, B. C., & McMillen, H.
- Venue
- Economic Botany
- Published
- 2017-09
- Volume
- 71
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 269-287
- ISSN
- 0013-0001 (ISSN-L)
- 1874-9364
- OpenAlex
- W2754350610
- Cited by
- 322
- References
- 100
- FWCI
- 16.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Theories and Major Hypotheses in Ethnobotany. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s12231-017-9389-8
- The paper
- Gaoue, O. G., Coe, M. A., Bond, M., Hart, G., Seyler, B. C., & McMillen, H. (2017). Theories and Major Hypotheses in Ethnobotany. Economic Botany. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12231-017-9389-8
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
