Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 3

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Growth, yield, water use efficiency of coriander (Coriandrum sativum) affected by irrigation levels and fertigation

HARISHA, C B, ASANGI, HONNAPP A, SINGH, RAVINDRA·2019·The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences
DOI 10.56093/ijas.v89i7.91691
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Understanding the effect of irrigation and fertigation on yield is essential for planning irrigation and nutrient management strategies in water scares regions. Therefore two years field experiment (2014-15 and 2015-16) was conducted to find out the interaction effect of irrigation regimes and fertigation on growth, seed yield, quality, water and nutrient use efficiency of coriander (Coriandrum sativum Benth.). In this study four irrigation levels (0.4 ET, 0.6 ET, 0.8 ET and 1.0 ET) and three fertigation levels (F1-50% nutrients F2-75% nutrients and F3-100% nutrients) were maintained using drip irrigation.Irrigation and fertigation significantly influenced the growth and seed yield along with water and nutrient use efficiency. The study revealed that irrigation at 0.8 evapotranspiration (ET) was optimum for obtaining better crop growth and seed yield in coriander. Significantly increase the essential oil content of seeds varying from 0.19% to 0.24% in drip irrigation at 0.4 ET and 1.0 ET, respectively. But fertigation has no significant influence on essential oil content. Water use efficiency was found higher in irrigation at 0.4 ET and it is 7.98 kg/ha mm of water and lowest was 5.07 kg/ha mm of water in case of irrigation at 1.0 ET. It is also observed that increasing irrigation level tends to improve nutrient use efficiency. It is concluded that drip irrigation at 0.8 ET along with 75% recommended dose of nutrients are optimum for coriander production, which ensures higher seed yield, water use efficiency and essential oil content.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.56093/ijas.v89i7.91691

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 27

  1. 10.1016/j.agwat.2012.06.017 · DOI
  2. 10.1016/j.scienta.2017.07.007 · doi:10.1016/j.scienta.2017.07.007
  3. 10.1016/j.indcrop.2007.05.002 · doi:10.1016/j.indcrop.2007.05.002
  4. 10.1016/j.fct.2008.11.006 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1016/j.scienta.2017.02.051 · doi:10.1016/j.scienta.2017.02.051
  6. 10.1016/j.agwat.2006.03.012 · doi:10.1016/j.agwat.2006.03.012
  7. 10.1016/j.indcrop.2012.11.004 · doi:10.1016/j.indcrop.2012.11.004
  8. 10.1016/j.scienta.2009.06.026 · doi:10.1016/j.scienta.2009.06.026
  9. 10.1093/jxb/erl165 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Gerloff G C and Gabelman W H. 1983. Genetic basis of inorganic plant nutrition. Encyclopaedia of Plant Physiology pp 453–80. Auchli A L and Bieleski R L (Eds). New series, 15B. Springer Verlag, New York.
  11. Godara S R, Verma I M G, Bairwa S and Yadav P K. 2013. Effect of different levels of drip irrigation along with various fertigation levels on growth, yield and water use efficiency in fennel (Foeniculum vulgare Mill.). Asian Journal of Horticulture 8(2): 758–62.
  12. 10.18782/2320-7051.2625 · doi:10.18782/2320-7051.2625
  13. 10.1016/j.jssas.2013.05.001 · DOI
  14. Hnilickova H and Duffek J. 2004. Water deficit and its effect on physiological manifestations in selected varieties of cauliflower (Brassica oleracea var. botrytis L.). Scientia Agriculturae Bohemica 35(2): 57–63.
  15. Honnappa A, Harisha C B and Ravindra Singh. 2017. Precision irrigation and fertigation for higher productivity and water use efficiency in fenugreek (Trigonella foenum-graecum L.) in semi-arid conditions of Rajasthan. Bioscan Supplements on Agronomy 12(1): 591–4.
  16. 10.1016/j.agwat.2012.03.006 · doi:10.1016/j.agwat.2012.03.006
  17. 10.1071/AR02014 · doi:10.1071/ar02014
  18. 10.1080/0972060X.2014.974080 · doi:10.1080/0972060x.2014.974080
  19. 10.5958/0976-0571.2014.00653.5 · doi:10.5958/0976-0571.2014.00653.5
  20. 10.4067/S0718-95162011000100002 · doi:10.4067/s0718-95162011000100002
  21. 10.1007/s00217-006-0425-7 · DOI
  22. 10.1002/ptr.4897 · DOI · Paper page
  23. 10.1016/j.agwat.2014.06.008 · doi:10.1016/j.agwat.2014.06.008
  24. 10.17557/tjfc.46160 · doi:10.17557/tjfc.46160
  25. Vasu D and Reddy M S. 2013. Effect of fertigation on yield, quality, nutrient uptake, fertilizer and water use efficiency in cabbage (Brassica oleracea). Agropedology 23(2): 106–12.
  26. Yanglem S D and Tumbare A D. 2014. Influence of irrigation regimes and fertigation levels on yield and physiological parameters in cauliflower. Bioscan 9(2): 589–94.
  27. 10.1007/s11104-006-9140-1 · doi:10.1007/s11104-006-9140-1

Cited by

See all 3

Metadata

Authors
HARISHA, C. B., ASANGI, H. A., & SINGH, R.
Venue
The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences
Publisher
Indian Council of Agricultural Research, Directorate of Knowledge Management in Agriculture
Published
2019-07-18
Volume
89
Issue
7
Pages
1167-1172
ISSN
  • 2394-3319
  • 0019-5022
DOI
10.56093/ijas.v89i7.91691
Cited by
3
References
0
Licence
creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 (unspecified)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Growth, yield, water use efficiency of coriander (Coriandrum sativum) affected by irrigation levels and fertigation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.56093/ijas.v89i7.91691
The paper
HARISHA, C. B., ASANGI, H. A., & SINGH, R. (2019). Growth, yield, water use efficiency of coriander (Coriandrum sativum) affected by irrigation levels and fertigation. The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v89i7.91691

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.