Cited by 0Mosquito-borne diseases and controlDengue and Mosquito Control ResearchMalaria Research and Control

Public Health Implications of Mosquito Fauna in Zoological and Recreational Environments: Evidence from Nekede Zoological Garden, Nigeria

Open access
Ugagu, Gerald M.·2026·JOURNAL OF BIOLOGY AND GENETIC RESEARCH

Abstract

Mosquito-borne diseases continue to pose major global health challenges, particularly in environments where humans, animals, and wildlife converge. This study investigated the mosquito fauna of Nekede Zoological Garden, Owerri, Nigeria, between October 2024 and March 2025, to assess their potential public health implications. A total of 902 mosquitoes representing four genera and eight species were collected. The most abundant species were Culex quinquefasciatus (40.9%), Aedes aegypti (29.4%), and Aedes albopictus (22.4%). These species are well documented vectors of lymphatic filariasis, dengue, chikungunya, and yellow fever. Seasonal variation indicated higher abundance during the rainy season. The detection of Aedes africanus in forest habitats highlights the potential risk of sylvatic yellow fever spillover. Although Toxorhynchites bengalensis is non-vectorial, its predatory role suggests possible biological control applications. The predominance of anthropophilic vectors in both animal cages and recreational sites underscores the zoonotic risk associated with zoological and recreational environments, where close human–animal contact occurs. Findings reinforce the importance of integrated mosquito surveillance, habitat management, and One Health–based vector control strategies to safeguard zoo visitors, staff, and animals from arbovirus and filariasis transmission.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.56201/jbgr.vol.12.no2.2026.pg30.37

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Still being checked.

Authors
Ugagu, G. M.
Affiliations
Department of Biology, University of Innovation, Science and Technology, Omuma, Nigeria.
Corresponding author
Ugagu, Gerald M.
Venue
JOURNAL OF BIOLOGY AND GENETIC RESEARCH
Published
2026-09-14
Pages
30
ISSN
  • 2545-5710 (ISSN-L)
  • 2695-222X
OpenAlex
W7213036739
Cited by
0
References
0
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
JOURNAL OF BIOLOGY AND GENETIC RESEARCH (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Mosquito-borne diseases and control
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Dengue and Mosquito Control Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Malaria Research and Control
Keywords
mosquito fauna, zoos, leisure environment, mosquito-borne diseases, Culex quinquefasciatus, Aedes aegypti, Aedes albopictus, Aedes africanus, sylvatic yellow fever, zoonotic risk, One Health, vector control, mosquito surveillance, seasonal variation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review