Algorithmic Decision-Making in Public Administration: The Role of Artificial Intelligence Applications in Shaping Modern Administrative Law
Open accessAbstract
The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into administrative systems has accelerated the transformation from e-administration to smart administration, producing a new generation of algorithmic administrative decisions.Unlike traditional decisions grounded in human interpretation of administrative law, these decisions are generated or supported by intelligent algorithmic models capable of predictive analysis, data classification, and automated enforcement.This study investigates the theoretical and practical implications of embedding AI enablers within the legal framework of administrative decision-making, with emphasis on the enforceability and legitimacy of algorithmic decisions.Drawing on comparative legal analysis, case studies, and doctrinal examination, the research demonstrates that algorithmic decision-making challenges the fundamental doctrines of legality, transparency, and judicial oversight.Findings suggest that while algorithmic decisions enhance efficiency, neutrality, and objectivity in public administration, they simultaneously introduce risks of opacity, bias, and accountability gaps.Therefore, urgent reforms are required to adapt legislation and judicial mechanisms, ensuring that algorithmic administrative decisions remain consistent with principles of the rule of law, due process, and fundamental rights.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
3 of 15 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured
- Interpretationcitation
In algorithmic administrative decisions, the element of jurisdiction lies with the authority supervising and managing the algorithmic processing system used to make the decision.
“In algorithmic administrative decisions, the element of jurisdiction lies with the authority supervising and managing the algorithmic processing system used to make the decision.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [5] 5. Kochling, A., & Wenher, M. C. (2020). Discriminated by an algorithm: A systemic review of discrimination and fairness by algorithm decision-making in the context of HR recruitment and HR development. Business Research, 13(1), 1-54. source
Section 6.2 (Practical implications; page unavailable) says companies should clarify accountability and identify people responsible for using algorithmic tools. The paper discusses HR decisions, but the passages found for jurisdiction, administrative decisions, and supervisory authority do not address where jurisdiction lies in an algorithmic administrative decision. (LLM, conf=0.76)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Findingreasoning
The elements of object, purpose, and cause in algorithmic administrative decisions are predetermined due to the absence of an independent will in the algorithmic processing system.
“As for the elements of object, purpose, and cause, they are predetermined due to the absence of an independent will in the algorithmic processing system.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The algorithmic processing system lacks an independent will of its own.
- Findingnone given
Responsibility in cases of erroneous or harmful decisions remains unclear, oscillating between developers, administrators, and public authorities.
“Accountability Gaps -Responsibility in cases of erroneous or harmful decisions remains unclear, oscillating between developers, administrators, and public authorities.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingcitation
Electronic publication ensures high speed in delivering information and the content of decisions to addressees regardless of their location whether within the country or abroad.
“Moreover, it ensures high speed in delivering information and the content of decisions to the addressees, regardless of their location whether within the country or abroad 16 .”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [16] 16. Al-Arabi, W. (2022). The electronic administrative decision as a modern method of managing public facilities. Al-Zaeria Journal of Law and Political Sciences, University of Abou Bekr Belkaid Tlemcen, Algeria, 7(1), p. 753.
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning
Algorithmic decision-making challenges the fundamental doctrines of legality, transparency, and judicial oversight.
“Drawing on comparative legal analysis, case studies, and doctrinal examination, the research demonstrates that algorithmic decision-making challenges the fundamental doctrines of legality, transparency, and judicial oversight.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The integration of AI into administrative systems has accelerated and is widespread.
- Interpretationcitation
If the administration enjoys discretionary authority regarding the object of the decision, human intervention remains possible especially when it is not feasible to fully translate the possible options into a set of algorithms.
“However, if the administration enjoys discretionary authority regarding the object of the decision, human intervention remains possible especially when it is not feasible to fully translate the possible options into a set of algorithms 10 .”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [10] 10. Khabal, H. (2021-2022). Ibid., p. 171.
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationnone given
The enforceability of the algorithmic administrative decision against the administration itself is only achieved through its notification, which is digital rather than paper-based.
“In contrast, the enforceability of the algorithmic administrative decision against the administration itself is only achieved through its notification.This notification is digital rather than paper-based, by sending a copy of the decision via SMS to the concerned individual or through their personal email.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: An administrative decision is enforceable against addressees from the moment they become aware of it, and individuals may challenge such decisions only if they are tainted by a defect of illegality.
- Interpretationcitation
The formalities and procedures in algorithmic administrative decisions differ from those in traditional ones in terms of their external appearance or the final form in which the decision is issued.
“However, the formalities and procedures in algorithmic administrative decisions differ from those in traditional ones in terms of their external appearance or the final form in which the decision is issued 07 .”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [7] 7. Saleh, A. A. (2015). The importance of the role of e-government (local administration) in the process of administrative decision-making. Tikrit University Journal of Legal Sciences, 2(28), p. 44.
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
Jurisdiction is considered part of public order and cannot be violated, whether the decision is issued in a traditional, electronic, or algorithmic form.
“This is because jurisdiction is considered part of public order and cannot be violated, whether the decision is issued in a traditional, electronic, or algorithmic form.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [4] 4. -www.imcra.az.org, | Issue 12, Vol. 8, 2025 Algorithmic Decision-Making in Public Administration: The Role of Artificial Intelligence Applications in Shaping Modern Administrative Law Nedjoua Bessaid 3. Ait Oudia, B. M. (2020). The algorithmic administrative decision. Al-Ijtihad Journal of Legal and Economic Studies, Faculty of Law and Political Sciences, University of Ghardaia, Algeria, p. 18.
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 23
- May combine two claims. 9
- The quote only partly states this claim. 1
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe electronic administrative decision does not differ from the traditional administrative decision except in the means of expressing will.
“In this regard, the electronic administrative decision does not differ from the traditional administrative decision except in the means of expressing will, and nothing more 5 .”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [5] 5. Kochling, A., & Wenher, M. C. (2020). Discriminated by an algorithm: A systemic review of discrimination and fairness by algorithm decision-making in the context of HR recruitment and HR development. Business Research, 13(1), 1-54. source
The Introduction and §2.1 discuss algorithmic decision-making in human resources, not electronic administrative decisions. Searches for the distinction between electronic and traditional administrative decisions and for the means of expressing will found no passage addressing the claim. (LLM, conf=0.76)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationAI algorithms function by detecting correlations among data through their neural network, in a manner similar to human cognition.
“Artificial intelligence algorithms function by detecting correlations among these data through their neural network, in a manner similar to human cognition 2 .”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [2] 2. Malgieri, G. (2019). Automated decision-making in the EU Member States: The right to explanation and other -suitable safeguards‖ in the national legislations. Computer Law and Security Review, 35(5), 105327. source
The Conclusions and need for further research (page unavailable in our copy) describes big-data outputs as based on correlations more than causation. It does not say that AI algorithms use neural networks to detect those correlations or that they function similarly to human cognition; searches for those concepts found no supporting passage. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Findingnone givenThe algorithmic administrative decision differs from the traditional one with respect to the element of jurisdiction, since the electronic medium, pre-programmed to issue administrative decisions, becomes the responsible authority.
“The algorithmic administrative decision differs from the traditional one with respect to the element of jurisdiction, since the electronic medium, pre-programmed to issue administrative decisions, becomes the responsible authority.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
FindingcitationElectronic publication is characterized by precision and efficiency, as it relies on electronic procedures carried out in an organized and immediate manner, which are not easily breached.
“It is also characterized by precision and efficiency, as it relies on electronic procedures carried out in an organized and immediate manner, which are not easily breached.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [16] 16. Al-Arabi, W. (2022). The electronic administrative decision as a modern method of managing public facilities. Al-Zaeria Journal of Law and Political Sciences, University of Abou Bekr Belkaid Tlemcen, Algeria, 7(1), p. 753.
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
FindingreasoningPublic administration has shifted from a traditional model to a smart administration model, one that relies on speed in completing and executing transactions.
“As a result, public administration has shifted from a traditional model to a smart administration model, one that relies on speed in completing and executing transactions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Public administration is compelled to utilize AI due to its features of diversity, continuous innovation, and modernization of services.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
FindingreasoningThe administration increasingly relies on modern electronic communication tools for the publication and notification of algorithmic administrative decisions.
“The administration increasingly relies on modern electronic communication tools for the publication and notification of algorithmic administrative decisions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
Findingnone givenThe algorithmic administrative decision is distinguished from the traditional administrative decision in terms of the means through which the administration's will is expressed, namely through the use of modern electronic tools that contribute to the preparation and issuance process.
“The algorithmic administrative decision is distinguished from the traditional administrative decision in terms of the means through which the administration's will is expressed, namely through the use of modern electronic tools that contribute to the preparation and issuance process.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.
Findingnone givenAlgorithmic decisions enhance efficiency, neutrality, and objectivity in public administration.
“Findings suggest that while algorithmic decisions enhance efficiency, neutrality, and objectivity in public administration, they simultaneously introduce risks of opacity, bias, and accountability gaps.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Algorithmic administrative decisions are generated or supported by intelligent algorithmic models capable of predictive analysis, data classification, and automated enforcement.
May combine two claims.
Findingnone givenMany algorithms operate as black boxes, making judicial oversight and citizens' right to explanation difficult.
“Transparency Challenges -Many algorithms operate as -black boxes,‖ making judicial oversight and citizens' right to explanation difficult.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Findingnone givenAlgorithmic decisions reduce delays in administrative processes, enhance predictability, and minimize human errors.
“Efficiency Gains -Algorithmic decisions reduce delays in administrative processes, enhance predictability, and minimize human errors.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingreasoningAlgorithmic decisions introduce risks of opacity, bias, and accountability gaps.
“Findings suggest that while algorithmic decisions enhance efficiency, neutrality, and objectivity in public administration, they simultaneously introduce risks of opacity, bias, and accountability gaps.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Algorithmic administrative decisions are generated or supported by intelligent algorithmic models capable of predictive analysis, data classification, and automated enforcement.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
FindingreasoningElectronic publication reduces public expenditure and saves public funds compared to paper-based publication.
“It helps reduce public expenditure and save public funds compared to paper-based publication, which consumes significant amounts in printing and distribution.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [16] 16. Al-Arabi, W. (2022). The electronic administrative decision as a modern method of managing public facilities. Al-Zaeria Journal of Law and Political Sciences, University of Abou Bekr Belkaid Tlemcen, Algeria, 7(1), p. 753.
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Findingnone givenCurrent legislative frameworks inadequately define the legal nature of algorithmic administrative acts, raising questions on enforceability.
“Legal Ambiguity -Current legislative frameworks inadequately define the legal nature of algorithmic administrative acts, raising questions on enforceability.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningThe fundamental difference between electronic notification and traditional notification lies in the mechanism of preparation and issuance.
“From this, it becomes clear that the fundamental difference lies in the mechanism of preparation and issuance.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationIn algorithmic administrative decisions, the purpose is embedded at the stage of designing the processing system, which necessarily involves human intervention.
“Therefore, its purpose is embedded at the stage of designing the processing system, which necessarily involves human intervention 13 .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [13] 13. Khabal, H. (2021-2022). Op. cit., p. 173.
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Rests on an assumption: The algorithmic processing system lacks an independent will of its own.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningElectronic notification is distinguished by its reliance on electronic means and specific technical procedures not present in traditional notification.
“However, electronic notification is distinguished by its reliance on electronic means and specific technical procedures not present in traditional notification.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe algorithmic administrative decision does not necessarily have to take the form of an electronic document or be subject, in its issuance or notification, to electronic procedures.
“This contrasts with the algorithmic administrative decision, which does not necessarily have to take the form of an electronic document or be subject, in its issuance or notification, to electronic procedures.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningElectronic notification requires the decision to exist in the form of an electronic document, transmitted between parties through a programmed process carried out by the computer based on predefined commands.
“It requires the decision to exist in the form of an electronic document, which is transmitted between parties through a programmed process carried out by the computer based on predefined commands.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningElectronic publication of an administrative decision reflects a technical process that carries legal effect, enabling addressees to obtain the official document and establishing their knowledge of its content, making the decision enforceable against them.
“Accordingly, the electronic publication of an administrative decision reflects a technical process that carries legal effect, as it enables the addressees to obtain the official document of the administrative decision, thereby establishing their knowledge of its content.This, in turn, means that the decision becomes enforceable against them and produces its legal effects.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The administration's objective in issuing an administrative decision as an electronic document is to inform its addressees.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationWhen no system is designated, the moment of receipt is when the message enters any information system belonging to the addressee.
“When no system is designated: the moment of receipt is considered to be when the message enters any information system belonging to the addressee 22 .”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [22] 22. Ait Oudia, B. M. (2020). Op. cit., p. 21.
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationreasoningThe concept of the algorithmic administrative decision has emerged.
“Consequently, the concept of the algorithmic administrative decision has emerged.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The integration of AI into administrative systems has accelerated and is widespread.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe ultimate aim of notification remains to communicate the content of the administrative decision to the addressees through notification or personal notice.
“Its ultimate aim remains the same: to communicate the content of the administrative decision to the addressees through notification or personal notice 18 .”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [18] 18. Mensel, K., & Chaouche, H. (2021). Ibid., p. 809.
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe time of sending a message containing an electronic administrative decision is the moment the message has entered an information system not under the control of either the sender or the recipient, as established by the majority of legislations governing electronic transactions.
“This refers to the moment considered by the administration as proof that the message has entered an information system not under the control of either the sender or the recipient.This is the standard established by the majority of legislations governing electronic transactions 21 .”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [21] 21. Omar, B. A. (2024). The electronic administrative decision: A reading in the concept and importance. Journal of Jurisprudential and Legal Issues, 8(1), Laghouat, Algeria, p. 67.
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationWhen the addressee designates an information system for receiving the electronic message, the moment of receipt is when the message enters that designated system.
“When the addressee designates an information system for receiving the electronic message: the moment of receipt is deemed to be when the message enters that designated system.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [22] 22. Ait Oudia, B. M. (2020). Op. cit., p. 21.
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
InterpretationreasoningAlgorithmic regulatory decisions become effective through their publication on the administration's official website or via the official gazette's website of the state.
“As for algorithmic regulatory decisions, they become effective through their publication on the administration's official website or via the official gazette's website of the state.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationcitationIn the algorithmic administrative decision, the cause consists of pre-existing information, including data previously stored in the database considered the constitution of the algorithm.
“In the algorithmic administrative decision, the cause consists of pre-existing information, which includes data previously stored in the database considered the -constitution‖ of the algorithm.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [12] 12. Ben Sria, S. (2024). Applications of artificial intelligence in the field of administrative decisions. Al-Turath Journal, 14(2), Djelfa, Algeria, p. 94.
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningIn algorithmic administrative decisions, the object is the result of algorithmic processing, which is predetermined in its output variables.
“In the case of algorithmic administrative decisions, the object is the result of algorithmic processing, which is predetermined in its output variables.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The algorithm lacks the ability to interpret when the authority is bound by law.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisereasoningElectronic notification in modern administration does not differ in its purpose from its paper-based counterpart.
“It should be noted that electronic notification in modern administration does not differ in its purpose from its paperbased counterpart.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningThis shift has had a direct impact on the legal mechanisms upon which public administration depends in performing its duties, particularly administrative decisions.
“This shift has had a direct impact on the legal mechanisms upon which public administration depends in performing its duties-particularly administrative decisions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Public administration is compelled to utilize AI due to its features of diversity, continuous innovation, and modernization of services.
The paper relies on this without support.
The integration of AI into administrative systems has accelerated and is widespread.
“The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into administrative systems has accelerated the transformation from e-administration to smart administration, producing a new generation of algorithmic administrative decisions.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Administrative law is flexible and adaptable to scientific advancements.
“A key characteristic of administrative law is its flexibility and adaptability to scientific advancements, which ensures the continuity of public services and the provision of quality public service delivery.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Public administration is compelled to utilize AI due to its features of diversity, continuous innovation, and modernization of services.
“With the widespread adoption of artificial intelligence technology across various scientific fields, including management, public administration has been compelled to utilize AI due to its features of diversity, continuous innovation, and the modernization of services it provides.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The algorithm lacks the ability to interpret when the authority is bound by law.
“Full compliance is required with the instructions embedded in the algorithm, which lacks the ability to interpret when the authority is bound by law.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The algorithmic processing system lacks an independent will of its own.
“In contrast, in algorithmic administrative decisions, the algorithmic processing system lacks an independent will of its own.”
The paper relies on this without support.
An administrative decision is enforceable against addressees from the moment they become aware of it, and individuals may challenge such decisions only if they are tainted by a defect of illegality.
“The general principle regarding the enforceability of an administrative decision against the individuals to whom it is addressed is that it takes effect from the moment they become aware of the decision issued by the competent administrative authority through its unilateral will.Individuals may only challenge such decisions if they are tainted by a defect of illegality.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Algorithmic administrative decisions are generated or supported by intelligent algorithmic models capable of predictive analysis, data classification, and automated enforcement.
“these decisions are generated or supported by intelligent algorithmic models capable of predictive analysis, data classification, and automated enforcement.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The administration's objective in issuing an administrative decision as an electronic document is to inform its addressees.
“While the administration's objective in issuing the administrative decision as an electronic document is to inform its addressees, some legal scholars argue that this transmission alone is insufficient to establish actual knowledge of such administrative decisions.”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
The stated notification method conflicts with the permitted paper form
MajorThe enforceability section says notification is digital rather than paper-based. Earlier, the paper says an algorithmic decision may be issued on paper and communicated through traditional means.
“This notification is digital rather than paper-based, by sending a copy of the decision via SMS to the concerned individual or through their personal email.”
“It may then be issued in either electronic or paper form, bearing either a handwritten or electronic signature, and may be communicated through traditional means or via electronic transmission 6 .”
Responsibility for algorithmic decisions is assigned to different authorities
MajorThe conclusion says the electronic medium becomes the responsible authority, while the discussion of jurisdiction assigns that role to the authority supervising and managing the system.
“the electronic medium, pre-programmed to issue administrative decisions, becomes the responsible authority.”
“In algorithmic administrative decisions, the element of jurisdiction lies with the authority supervising and managing the algorithmic processing system used to make the decision.”
The same cited work has conflicting publication years
MinorTwo entries for the same authors, title, journal, volume, and issue give the publication year as 2024 and 1113.
“31.Ben Ramadan, L., & Ben Derah, A. I. (2024).Provisions of the electronic administrative decision's execution.Journal of Legal and Economic Research, 8(1), p. 38.”
“ Ben Ramadan, L., & Ben Derah, A. I. (1113).Provisions of the electronic administrative decision's execution.Journal of Legal and Economic Research, 8(1).”
Cites
The publisher hasn’t deposited this paper’s reference list.
Research works printed but not linked: 12
- [1]1. Mensel, K., & Chaouche, H. (2021). Legal issues of adopting the algorithmic administrative decision. Al- Risala Journal of Human Studies and Research, 6(4), Tebessa, p. 808.
- [4]4. -www.imcra.az.org, | Issue 12, Vol. 8, 2025 Algorithmic Decision-Making in Public Administration: The Role of Artificial Intelligence Applications in Shaping Modern Administrative Law Nedjoua Bessaid 3. Ait Oudia, B. M. (2020). The algorithmic administrative decision. Al-Ijtihad Journal of Legal and Economic Studies, Faculty of Law and Political Sciences, University of Ghardaia, Algeria, p. 18.
- [7]7. Saleh, A. A. (2015). The importance of the role of e-government (local administration) in the process of administrative decision-making. Tikrit University Journal of Legal Sciences, 2(28), p. 44.
- [9]9. Khabal, H. (2021-2022). Applications of artificial intelligence in the activity of public administration (PhD thesis). Faculty of Law and Political Sciences, University of Ghardaia, p. 170.
- [12]12. Ben Sria, S. (2024). Applications of artificial intelligence in the field of administrative decisions. Al-Turath Journal, 14(2), Djelfa, Algeria, p. 94.
- [16]16. Al-Arabi, W. (2022). The electronic administrative decision as a modern method of managing public facilities. Al-Zaeria Journal of Law and Political Sciences, University of Abou Bekr Belkaid Tlemcen, Algeria, 7(1), p. 753.
- [21]21. Omar, B. A. (2024). The electronic administrative decision: A reading in the concept and importance. Journal of Jurisprudential and Legal Issues, 8(1), Laghouat, Algeria, p. 67.
- [26]26. Rasha, M. S. Applications of AI management in administrative decision-making (Master's thesis). Department of Public Law, Faculty of Law, Middle East University, Jordan, pp. 98-99.
- [27]27. Omar, A. A. H. (2021). Means of execution of the electronic administrative decision. Al-Bayan Journal of Legal and Political Studies, 6(1), University of Bachir El-Ibrahimi, Bordj Bou Arreridj, Algeria, p. 171.
- [30]30. Omar, A. A. H. (2021). Op. cit., p. 20. 61 -www.imcra.az.org, | Issue 12, Vol. 8, 2025 Algorithmic Decision-Making in Public Administration: The Role of Artificial Intelligence Applications in Shaping Modern Administrative Law Nedjoua Bessaid
- [31]31. Kochling, A., & Wenher, M. C. (2020). Discriminated by an algorithm: A systemic review of discrimination and fairness by algorithm decision-making in the context of HR recruitment and HR development. Business Research, 13(1), 1-54.
- [32]32. Malgieri, G. (2019). Automated decision-making in the EU Member States: The right to explanation and other -suitable safeguards‖ in the national legislations. Computer Law and Security Review, 35(5), 105327.
- Authors
- Bessaid, N.
- Affiliations
- University Centre of Maghnia (DZ)
- Corresponding author
- Bessaid, Nedjoua
- Venue
- Science, Education and Innovations in the context of modern problems
- Published
- 2025-09-20
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 51-61
- ISSN
- 2790-0169 (ISSN-L)
- 2790-0177
- OpenAlex
- W4414429313
- Semantic Scholar
- 0dd27d54716978837b59cd7475a2276aeb2ac53e
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Science Education and Innovations in the Context of Modern Problems (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Administrative Law and Governance
- Social Sciences › Law › Digitalization, Law, and Regulation
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Artificial Intelligence in Law
- Keywords
- algorithmic decision-making, artificial intelligence in public administration, administrative law, e-government, algorithmic transparency, judicial oversight, algorithmic bias, accountability, legality, due process, fundamental rights, rule of law, automated enforcement, legal reform
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-11.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-11.
Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
