The American Academy of Sleep Medicine Inter-scorer Reliability Program: Sleep Stage Scoring
Open accessAbstract
Study objectives The program provides a unique opportunity to compare a large number of scorers with varied levels of experience to determine sleep stage scoring agreement. The objective is to examine areas of disagreement to inform future revisions of the AASM Manual for the Scoring of Sleep and Associated Events. Methods The sample included 9 record fragments, 1,800 epochs and more than 3,200,000 scoring decisions. More than 2,500 scorers, most with 3 or more years of experience, participated. The analysis determined agreement with the score chosen by the majority of scorers. Results Sleep stage agreement averaged 82.6%. Agreement was highest for stage R sleep with stages N2 and W approaching the same level. Scoring agreement for stage N3 sleep was 67.4% and was lowest for stage N1 at 63.0%. Scorers had particular difficulty with the last epoch of stage W before sleep onset, the first epoch of stage N2 after stage N1 and the first epoch of stage R after stage N2. Discrimination between stages N2 and N3 was particularly difficult for scorers. Conclusions These findings suggest that with current rules, inter-scorer agreement in a large group is approximately 83%, a level similar to that reported for agreement between expert scorers. Agreement in the scoring of stages N1 and N3 sleep was low. Modifications to the scoring rules to improve scoring during sleep stage transitions may result in improvement.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Average inter-scorer reliability for sleep stage scoring is approximately 83%.
“Rosenberg et al. reported that the average inter-scorer reliability for sleep stage scoring was approximately 83%102.”
From The future of sleep health: a data-driven revolution in sleep science and medicine (2020) · cites this paper as [102]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Arnal, P. J., Thorey, V., Debellemaniere, E., Ballard, M. E., Bou Hernandez, A., Guillot, A., Jourde, H., Harris, M., Guillard, M., Van Beers, P., et al. (2020) · SLEEP · doi:10.1093/sleep/zsaa097 · Cited by 394 · see citing works
The future of sleep health: a data-driven revolution in sleep science and medicine
Perez-Pozuelo, I., Zhai, B., Palotti, J., Mall, R., Aupetit, M., Garcia-Gomez, J. M., Taheri, S., Guan, Y., & Fernandez-Luque, L. (2020) · npj Digital Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41746-020-0244-4 · Cited by 311 · see citing works
Automated sleep scoring: A review of the latest approaches
Fiorillo, L., Puiatti, A., Papandrea, M., Ratti, P.-L., Favaro, P., Roth, C., Bargiotas, P., Bassetti, C. L., & Faraci, F. D. (2019) · Sleep Medicine Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.smrv.2019.07.007 · Cited by 284 · see citing works
Beattie, Z., Oyang, Y., Statan, A., Ghoreyshi, A., Pantelopoulos, A., Russell, A., & Heneghan, C. (2017) · Physiological Measurement · doi:10.1088/1361-6579/aa9047 · Cited by 198 · see citing works
Automating sleep stage classification using wireless, wearable sensors
Boe, A. J., McGee Koch, L. L., O’Brien, M. K., Shawen, N., Rogers, J. A., Lieber, R. L., Reid, K. J., Zee, P. C., & Jayaraman, A. (2019) · npj Digital Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41746-019-0210-1 · Cited by 98 · see citing works
Finan, P. H., Richards, J. M., Gamaldo, C. E., Han, D., Leoutsakos, J. M., Salas, R., Irwin, M. R., & Smith, M. T. (2016) · Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine · doi:10.5664/jcsm.6262 · Cited by 90 · see citing works
Sleep apnea: a review of diagnostic sensors, algorithms, and therapies
Shokoueinejad, M., Fernandez, C., Carroll, E., Wang, F., Levin, J., Rusk, S., Glattard, N., Mulchrone, A., Zhang, X., Xie, A., et al. (2017) · Physiological Measurement · doi:10.1088/1361-6579/aa6ec6 · Cited by 64 · see citing works
Expert Discussions Improve Comprehension of Difficult Cases in Medical Image Assessment
Schaekermann, M., Cai, C. J., Huang, A. E., & Sayres, R. (2020) · Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3313831.3376290 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
- Authors
- Rosenberg, R. S., & Van Hout, S.
- Affiliations
- American Academy of Sleep Medicine (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine
- Published
- 2013-01-15
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 81-87
- ISSN
- 1550-9389 (ISSN-L)
- 1550-9397
- PMC
- PMC3525994
- OpenAlex
- W2143159308
- Cited by
- 456
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 53 · 2025: 65 · 2024: 65 · 2023: 53 · 2022: 49 · 2021: 37 · 2020: 30 · 2019: 35 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 4
- FWCI
- 14.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Reliability and Agreement in Measurement
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research
- Keywords
- sleep stage classification, REM sleep, sleep stage transitions, scoring rules
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aged, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Sleep Stages, Societies, Medical, Reproducibility of Results, Observer Variation, Young Adult, Sleep Medicine Specialty
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review