Working Memory Capacity is Decreased in Sleep-Deprived Internal Medicine Residents
Open accessThe claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In medical residents, sleep variability and reduced sleep duration were more prevalent during on-call rotations and were significantly associated with a reduction in working memory capacity.
“In a study of on-call and non-call rotation medical residents, sleep variability and reduced sleep duration were more prevalent during on-call rotations and were significantly associated with a reduction in working memory capacity (Gohar et al. 2009).”
From Sleep Problems Across Development: A Pathway to Adolescent Risk Taking Through Working Memory (2015) · cites this paper as Gohar et al. 2009
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 30 · Cited by 87
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- [1]Kohn L, Corrigan J, Donaldson M. Washington, DC: Institute of Medicine; 1999. To err is human: a safer health system. [Google Scholar]
- [15]Heitz RP, Unsworth N, Engle RW. Working memory capacity, attention control and fluid intelligence. In: Wilhelm O, Engle RW, editors. Handbook of Understanding and Measuring Intelligence. London: Sage Publications Inc.; 2004. pp. 61–78. [Google Scholar]
- [25]R Development Core Team. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria: 2007. [Accessed March 12, 2009]. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. ISBN 3-900051-07-0. at http://www.R-project.org. [Google Scholar]
- Authors
- Gohar, A., Adams, A., Gertner, E., Sackett-Lundeen, L., Heitz, R., Engle, R., Haus, E., & Bijwadia, J.
- Affiliations
- Regions Hospital (US)
- University of Minnesota (US)
- Vanderbilt University (US)
- Georgia Institute of Technology (US)
- Corresponding author
- Adams, Alexander
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine
- Published
- 2009-06-15
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 191-197
- ISSN
- 1550-9389 (ISSN-L)
- 1550-9397
- PMC
- PMC2699161
- OpenAlex
- W4297900657
- Cited by
- 87
- References
- 30
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 6.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Hospital Admissions and Outcomes
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Sleep and Wakefulness Research
- Keywords
- working memory capacity, sleep deprivation, internal medicine residents, residency training, sleep hours, sleep-wake cycle, subjective sleepiness, medical errors
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Clinical Competence, Female, Humans, Internal Medicine, Internship and Residency, Male, Memory Disorders, Memory, Short-Term, Minnesota, Surveys and Questionnaires, Self Disclosure, Sleep Deprivation, Task Performance and Analysis, Work Schedule Tolerance, Medical Errors, Young Adult, Actigraphy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review