Cited by 71Sleep and related disordersPrimary Care and Health OutcomesPharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes

Time trends in the family physician management of insomnia: The Australian experience (2000–2015)

Open access

Abstract

Study objectives To evaluate changes in rates of family physician (FP) management of insomnia in Australia from 2000-2015.Methods The Bettering the Evaluation And Care of Health (BEACH) program is a nationally representative cross-sectional survey of 1,000 newly randomly sampled family physicians' activity in Australia per year, who each record details of 100 consecutive patient encounters. This provided records of approximately 100,000 encounters each year. We identified all encounters with patients older than 15 years where insomnia or difficulty sleeping was managed and assessed trends in these encounters from 2000-2015.Results There was no change in the management rate of insomnia from 2000-2007 (1.54 per 100 encounters [95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.49-1.58]). This rate was lower from 2008-2015 (1.31 per 100 encounters [95% CI: 1.27-1.35]). There was no change in FP management: pharmacotherapy was used in approximately 90% of encounters; nonpharmacological advice was given at approximately 20%; and onward referral at approximately 1% of encounters. Prescription of temazepam changed from 54.6 [95% CI: 51.4-57.9] per 100 insomnia problems in 2000-2001 to 43.6 [95% CI: 40.1-47.0] in 2014-2015, whereas zolpidem increased steadily from introduction in 2000 to 14.6 [95% CI: 12.2-17.1] per 100 insomnia problems in 2006-2007, and then decreased to 7.3 [95% CI: 5.4-9.2] by 2014-2015.Conclusions Insomnia management frequency decreased after 2007 in conjunction with ecologically associated Australian media reporting of adverse effects linked to zolpidem use. Australian FPs remain reliant on pharmacotherapy for the management of insomnia.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5664/jcsm.6616

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A lack of access to CBTi has resulted in the majority of insomnia sufferers receiving prescriptions for sedative-hypnotic medications as the initial and ongoing treatment.

    “a lack of access to CBTi has resulted in the majority of insomnia sufferers receiving prescriptions for sedative-hypnotic medications as the initial and ongoing treatment [12,13].”

    From Co-morbid insomnia and sleep apnea (COMISA): Prevalence, consequences, methodological considerations, and recent randomized controlled trials (2019) · cites this paper as [12]

    The Results (Changes in Management Approaches; page unavailable) report medication use at approximately 90% of Australian family-physician insomnia management occasions. The Introduction describes limited CBT access, but the Discussion says only that unchanged management practices were possibly due to limited health-system capacity. The paper does not establish that lack of CBT access caused most insomnia sufferers to receive sedative-hypnotic prescriptions as both initial and ongoing treatment. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. [21]Marshall N, Glozier N, Grunstein RR. Thirty-fold spike in adverse event reporting associated with zolpidem use in Australia was most likely caused by the media. Sleep. 2009;32:A393. Abstract Suppl. [Google Scholar]
  2. [27]Charles J, Harrison C, Britt H. Insomnia. Aust Fam Physician. 2009;38(5):283. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. [38]WONCA International Classification Committee. International Classification of Primary Care: ICPC-2. 2nd ed. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press; 1998. [Google Scholar]
  4. [42]Kathol RG, Arnedt JT. Cognitive behavioral therapy for chronic insomnia: confronting the challenges to implementation. Ann Intern Med. 2016;165(2):149–150. doi: 10.7326/M16-0359. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Miller, C. B., Valenti, L., Harrison, C. M., Bartlett, D. J., Glozier, N., Cross, N. E., Grunstein, R. R., Britt, H. C., & Marshall, N. S.
Affiliations
The University of Sydney (AU)
Corresponding author
Marshall, Nathaniel S.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine
Published
2017-06-15
Volume
13
Issue
6
Pages
785-790
ISSN
  • 1550-9389 (ISSN-L)
  • 1550-9397
OpenAlex
W2736916391
Cited by
71
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1
FWCI
5.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Primary Care and Health Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
Keywords
insomnia, general practitioners, primary care management, prescribing patterns, temazepam, zolpidem, media coverage, temporal trends, Australia
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Australia, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Hypnotics and Sedatives, Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders, Male, Middle Aged, Physicians, Family, Referral and Consultation, Time, Health Care Surveys, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review