Racial bias in accuracy of pulse oximetry and its impact on assessments of hypopnea and T90 in clinical studies
Open accessIntegrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Several health organizations and healthcare professionals have raised growing concerns about the clinical accuracy of pulse oximetry in dark-skinned patients, particularly in detecting occult hypoxemia.
“Due to this increasing evidence, several health organizations and healthcare professionals have raised growing concerns about the clinical accuracy of pulse oximetry in dark-skinned patients [20,57,58,59,60,61], particularly in detecting occult hypoxemia [54,55].”
From Skin pigmentation influence on pulse oximetry accuracy: a systematic review and bibliometric analysis (2022) · cites this paper as [59]
The main reason for the upsurge of publications in 2021 may be attributed to the increase of pulse oximetry for triage in patients because of the COVID-19 pandemic and recent concern about accuracy across all skin types.
“The main reason for this surge may be attributed to the increase of this technique for triage in patients because of the current COVID-19 pandemic [12,13,14,15,16,17], and also because of the recent concern about the accuracy of these devices across all skin types [20,57,58,59,60,61].”
From Skin pigmentation influence on pulse oximetry accuracy: a systematic review and bibliometric analysis (2022) · cites this paper as [59]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 4 · Cited by 5
- Authors
- Hunasikatti, M.
- Affiliations
- United States Food and Drug Administration (US)
- Corresponding author
- Hunasikatti, Mahadevappa
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine
- Published
- 2021-05
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1145-1145
- ISSN
- 1550-9389 (ISSN-L)
- 1550-9397
- PMC
- PMC8320489
- OpenAlex
- W3130011793
- Cited by
- 5
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1
- FWCI
- 0.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
- Keywords
- pulse oximetry, racial bias, hypopnea detection, T90, sleep apnea
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
