Cited by 312Innovations in Medical EducationEducational Assessment and PedagogyEvaluation of Teaching Practices

The Relevance of Prior Knowledge in Learning and Instructional Design

Open access
Hailikari, Telle, Katajavuori, Nina, Lindblom-Ylanne, Sari·2008·American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education

Abstract

Objectives To determine how different types of prior knowledge (declarative and procedural) impact student achievement and how prior-knowledge assessment can be used as an instructional design tool. Methods A questionnaire was developed based on the prior-knowledge model, which distinguishes between declarative and procedural knowledge. One hundred fifteen pharmacy students were tested prior to beginning 4 successive basic science courses and then prior to beginning a pharmaceutical chemistry course. Regression analysis was used to determine which type of knowledge was the best predictor of student achievement. The 4 course instructors were interviewed and their comments analyzed. Results Prior knowledge from previous courses significantly influenced student achievement. Procedural knowledge was especially related to student achievement. Instructors and students had mainly positive reactions towards the prior-knowledge tests. Conclusions Students' prior knowledge should be taken into consideration in instructional design and curriculum planning. Furthermore, the results of prior-knowledge assessments may be used as a tool for student support in addressing areas of deficiency.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5688/aj7205113

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hailikari, T., Katajavuori, N., & Lindblom-Ylanne, S.
Affiliations
University of Helsinki (FI)
Venue
American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-09
Volume
72
Issue
5
Pages
113
ISSN
  • 0002-9459 (ISSN-L)
  • 1553-6467
OpenAlex
W2065781982
Cited by
312
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 24 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 35 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 33 · 2021: 33 · 2020: 33 · 2019: 31 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 4
FWCI
2.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
  • Social Sciences › Education › Educational Assessment and Pedagogy
  • Social Sciences › Education › Evaluation of Teaching Practices
Keywords
prior knowledge, declarative knowledge, procedural knowledge, prior knowledge assessment, academic performance, instructional design, curriculum development, pharmacy students, medicinal chemistry
MeSH terms
Chemistry, Pharmaceutical, Competency-Based Education, Education, Pharmacy, Educational Measurement, Female, Finland, Humans, Learning, Male, Surveys and Questionnaires, Regression Analysis, Students, Pharmacy, Teaching

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review