Cited by 18Social Media in Health EducationInnovations in Medical EducationInterprofessional Education and Collaboration

Examining Health Care Students’ Attitudes toward E-Professionalism

Open access
Gettig, Jacob P., Noronha, Sandhya, Graneto, John, Obucina, Lillian, Christensen, Kelli J., Fjortoft, Nancy F.·2016·American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education

Abstract

Objective. To compare pharmacy, osteopathic medicine, dental medicine, and physician assistant (PA) students' perceptions of e-professionalism. Methods. A 20-item questionnaire was developed and administered to four cohorts of health care professions students early in their first professional year. The questionnaire contained 16 scenarios in which a hypothetical health care student or professional shared information or content electronically and students were asked to indicate how much they agreed that the scenario represented professional behavior. Results. Ninety-four percent of students completed the questionnaire. More female students were in the pharmacy and PA cohorts. There were statistical differences in students' perceptions of e-professionalism in five of 16 scenarios. Specific differences were most often between the osteopathic medicine students and the other cohorts. Conclusions. The health care professions students surveyed had similar perceptions of e-professionalism. Of the four cohorts, osteopathic medicine students appeared less conservative in their approach to e-professionalism than the other cohorts.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5688/ajpe8010169

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Significant gender differences in social media use were established in several studies.

    “Significant gender differences were established in several studies [71,79,91,95,105,107].”

    From Dangers and Benefits of Social Media on E-Professionalism of Health Care Professionals: Scoping Review (2021) · cites this paper as [71]

    The Results report significant differences in e-professionalism responses between health-care student cohorts, not between genders. The Discussion notes that the cohorts differed in their percentages of female students but says the reasons for the response differences are unclear; it does not establish significant gender differences in social media use. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gettig, J. P., Noronha, S., Graneto, J., Obucina, L., Christensen, K. J., & Fjortoft, N. F.
Affiliations
  • Midwestern University (US)
  • Kansas City University (US)
Venue
American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-12
Volume
80
Issue
10
Pages
169
ISSN
0002-9459 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2585525848
Cited by
18
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1
FWCI
1.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Social Media in Health Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Interprofessional Education and Collaboration
Keywords
e-professionalism, health professions students, professional conduct, digital communication, pharmacy students, dental students, physician assistant students, professional ethics, gender differences
MeSH terms
Professionalism, Adult, Attitude, Attitude of Health Personnel, Education, Dental, Education, Pharmacy, Female, Humans, Male, Osteopathic Medicine, Physician Assistants, Surveys and Questionnaires, Students, Students, Pharmacy, Professional Role, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review