Grief and loss: past, present and future
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Grief is an emotion relevant to emotional alignment, its emotional content naturally evokes empathy, and the tendency to grieve has been found to correlate with a tendency to empathize.
“In Experiment 1, we chose grief as a theme likely to promote social cognition since it is an emotion and hence relevant to the question of emotional alignment; its emotional content naturally evokes empathy; and the tendency to grieve has been found to correlate with a tendency to empathize (Kellehear, 2002;Oltjenbruns, 1991).”
From The effects of reading narrative fiction on social and moral cognition (2021) · cites this paper as Kellehear, 2002
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 8 · Cited by 16
- Authors
- Kellehear, A.
- Affiliations
- La Trobe University (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Kellehear, Allan
- ORCID
- Kellehear, Allan
- Venue
- Medical Journal of Australia
- Publisher
- AMPCo
- Published
- 2002-08
- Volume
- 177
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 176-177
- ISSN
- 0025-729X (ISSN-L)
- 1326-5377
- OpenAlex
- W2468623399
- Cited by
- 16
- References
- 8
- Citations by year
- 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- The Medical Journal of Australia (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health
- Social Sciences › Anthropology › Death, Funerary Practices, and Mourning
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
- Keywords
- grief, loss, bereavement, mourning, bereavement support
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Child, Emotions, Grief, Humans, Research
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
