Cited by 35Health, Medicine and SocietyEthics in medical practiceEthics and bioethics in healthcare

Medical professionalism in the new millennium: a physicians' charter

Open access
Medical Professionalism Project·2002·Medical Journal of Australia

Abstract

The practice of medicine in the modern era is beset with unprecedented challenges in virtually all cultures and societies.These challenges centre on increasing disparities between the legitimate needs of patients, the available resources to meet those needs, the increasing dependence on market forces to transform healthcare systems, and the temptation for physicians to forsake their traditional commitment to the primacy of patients' interests.To maintain the fidelity of medicine' s social contract during this turbulent time, we believe that physicians must reaffirm their active dedication to the principles of professionalism, which entails not only their personal commitment to the welfare of their patients but also collective efforts to improve the healthcare system for the welfare of society.This Charter on Medical Professionalism is intended to encourage such dedication and to promote an action agenda for the profession of medicine that is universal in scope and purpose.Medical professionalism in the new millennium: a physicians' charter*

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2002.tb04762.x

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Unpreparedness of healthcare providers to transition to virtual interactions with patients threatens professionalism worldwide, and the need to promote professionalism in medical education has risen.

    “One of the factors that threaten professionalism worldwide is the unpreparedness of healthcare providers to transition to virtual interactions with patients [15–17], hence the need to promote professionalism in medical education has risen and is constantly being modified [18–20].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Medical Professionalism Project
Corresponding author
Medical Professionalism Project
Venue
Medical Journal of Australia
Publisher
AMPCo
Published
2002-09
Volume
177
Issue
5
Pages
263-265
ISSN
  • 0025-729X (ISSN-L)
  • 1326-5377
OpenAlex
W2433972184
Cited by
35
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
6.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Medical Journal of Australia (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • McGill University
  • ABIM Foundation
  • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health, Medicine and Society
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Ethics in medical practice
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics and bioethics in healthcare
Keywords
medical professionalism, patient well-being, healthcare resource allocation, health care reform
MeSH terms
Physician-Patient Relations, Physician's Role, Professional Role

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review