The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A prospective before‐and‐after trial of a medical emergency team
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect on cardiac arrests and overall hospital mortality of an intensive care-based medical emergency team. DESIGN AND SETTING: Prospective before-and-after trial in a tertiary referral hospital. PATIENTS: Consecutive patients admitted to hospital during a 4-month "before" period (May-August 1999) (n = 21 090) and a 4-month intervention period (November 2000 -February 2001) (n = 20 921). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Number of cardiac arrests, number of patients dying after cardiac arrest, number of postcardiac-arrest bed-days and overall number of in-hospital deaths. RESULTS: There were 63 cardiac arrests in the "before" period and 22 in the intervention period (relative risk reduction, RRR: 65%; P < 0.001). Thirty-seven deaths were attributed to cardiac arrests in the "before" period and 16 in the intervention period (RRR: 56%; P = 0.005). Survivors of cardiac arrest in the "before" period required 163 ICU bed-days versus 33 in the intervention period (RRR: 80%; P < 0.001), and 1353 hospital bed-days versus 159 in the intervention period (RRR: 88%; P < 0.001). There were 302 deaths in the "before" period and 222 in the intervention period (RRR: 26%; P = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of in-hospital cardiac arrest and death following cardiac arrest, bed occupancy related to cardiac arrest, and overall in-hospital mortality decreased after introducing an intensive care-based medical emergency team.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Hodgetts, T. J., Kenward, G., Vlachonikolis, I. G., Payne, S., & Castle, N. (2002) · Resuscitation · doi:10.1016/s0300-9572(02)00100-4 · Cited by 355
Cited by
Gao, H., McDonnell, A., Harrison, D. A., Moore, T., Adam, S., Daly, K., Esmonde, L., Goldhill, D. R., Parry, G. J., Rashidian, A., et al. (2007) · Intensive Care Medicine · doi:10.1007/s00134-007-0532-3 · Cited by 466
Rapid-Response Systems as a Patient Safety Strategy: A Systematic Review
Winters, B. D., Weaver, S. J., Pfoh, E. R., Yang, T., Pham, J. C., & Dy, S. M. (2013) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-158-5-201303051-00009 · Cited by 438
Solomon, R. S., Corwin, G. S., Barclay, D. C., Quddusi, S. F., & Dannenberg, M. D. (2016) · Journal of Hospital Medicine · doi:10.1002/jhm.2554 · Cited by 225
Greif (2020) · doi:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2020.09.014 · Cited by 158
Prevalence and sensitivity of MET-criteria in a Scandinavian University Hospital
Bell, M. B., Konrad, D., Granath, F., Ekbom, A., & Martling, C.-R. (2006) · Resuscitation · doi:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2005.11.011 · Cited by 130
Metadata
- Authors
- Bellomo, R., Goldsmith, D., Uchino, S., Buckmaster, J., Hart, G. K., Opdam, H., Silvester, W., Doolan, L., & Gutteridge, G.
- Venue
- Medical Journal of Australia
- Publisher
- AMPCo
- Published
- 2003-09
- Volume
- 179
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 283-287
- ISSN
- 0025-729X (ISSN-L)
- 1326-5377
- OpenAlex
- W2153462415
- Cited by
- 590
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 41.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A prospective before‐and‐after trial of a medical emergency team. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5694/j.1326-5377.2003.tb05548.x
- The paper
- Bellomo, R., Goldsmith, D., Uchino, S., Buckmaster, J., Hart, G. K., Opdam, H., Silvester, W., Doolan, L., & Gutteridge, G. (2003). A prospective before‐and‐after trial of a medical emergency team. Medical Journal of Australia. https://doi.org/10.5694/j.1326-5377.2003.tb05548.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.