Cited by 30Health Sciences Research and EducationHealth Policy Implementation ScienceClinical practice guidelines implementation

The science of changing providers’ behaviour: the missing link in evidence‐based practice

Open access
Sanson‐Fisher, Robert W, Grimshaw, Jeremy M, Eccles, Martin P·2004·Medical Journal of Australia

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2004.tb05884.x

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In an experimental study, concurrent formative evaluation can supply working hypotheses that explain why implementation succeeded or failed, especially when implementation and evaluation plans are based on a conceptual framework.

    “However, within an experimental study, in-depth data from a concurrent FE can provide working hypotheses to explain successes or failures, particularly when the implementation and evaluation plans are grounded in a conceptual framework.[55][56][57]”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sanson‐Fisher, R. W., Grimshaw, J. M., & Eccles, M. P.
Affiliations
  • Faculty of Health, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW.
  • Ottawa Hospital Research Institute (CA)
  • Newcastle University (GB)
Venue
Medical Journal of Australia
Publisher
AMPCo
Published
2004-03
Volume
180
Issue
5
Pages
205-206
ISSN
  • 0025-729X (ISSN-L)
  • 1326-5377
OpenAlex
W2419448296
Cited by
30
References
8
Citations by year
2022: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2013: 3
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Medical Journal of Australia (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Newcastle University ePrints (Newcastle Univesity)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Sciences Research and Education
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Clinical practice guidelines implementation
Keywords
evidence-based practice, clinical practice change, implementation of evidence, health professionals' practices
MeSH terms
Australia, Family Practice, Humans, Organizational Innovation, Practice Patterns, Physicians', Sociology, Medical, Evidence-Based Medicine, Behavioral Research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review