The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Vision loss in Australia
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To assess the prevalence and causes of vision loss in Australia and to project these data into the future. DESIGN: Synthesis of data from two cross-sectional population-based cohort studies--the Melbourne Visual Impairment Project and the Blue Mountains Eye Study--and extrapolation to the entire Australian population. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: 8376 community and 533 nursing home residents recruited between 1992 and 1996 in urban and rural Victoria and New South Wales. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Age-standardised prevalence of low vision (visual acuity < 6/12) and blindness (visual acuity < 6/60) (both measured in the best eye, with spectacles if usually worn for distance vision), and their causes for the Australian population for 2000 to 2024, projected from Australian Bureau of Statistics population data. RESULTS: In 2004, 480,300 Australians were estimated to have low vision, including 50,600 with blindness. The most common causes of low vision were undercorrected refractive error (62%), cataract (14%) and age-related macular degeneration (10%). The latter was responsible for almost half of all cases of blindness. The numbers of people with low vision and blindness are projected to almost double by 2024. CONCLUSIONS: Vision loss in Australia is a much bigger problem than is usually recognised; 76% of low vision is caused by uncorrected refractive error or cataract, both readily treatable. However, the prevention and treatment of macular degeneration poses a major challenge.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Causes and Prevalence of Visual Impairment Among Adults in the UnitedStates
(2004) · Archives of Ophthalmology · doi:10.1001/archopht.122.4.477 · Cited by 2,616
Cited by
Age‐related macular degeneration—emerging pathogenetic and therapeutic concepts
Gehrs, K. M., Anderson, D. H., Johnson, L. V., & Hageman, G. S. (2006) · Annals of Medicine · doi:10.1080/07853890600946724 · Cited by 631
Dandona, L., & Dandona, R. (2006) · BMC Medicine · doi:10.1186/1741-7015-4-7 · Cited by 269
Lewis, P. M., Ackland, H. M., Lowery, A. J., & Rosenfeld, J. V. (2015) · Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2014.11.020 · Cited by 228
Hu, W., Joseph, S., Li, R., Woods, E., Sun, J., Shen, M., Jan, C. L., Zhu, Z., He, M., & Zhang, L. (2024) · eClinicalMedicine · doi:10.1016/j.eclinm.2023.102387 · Cited by 47
Semantic labeling for prosthetic vision
Horne, L., Alvarez, J., McCarthy, C., Salzmann, M., & Barnes, N. (2016) · Computer Vision and Image Understanding · doi:10.1016/j.cviu.2016.02.015 · Cited by 30
Metadata
- Authors
- Taylor, H. R., Keeffe, J. E., Vu, H. T. V., Wang, J. J., Rochtchina, E., Mitchell, P., & Pezzullo, M. L.
- Venue
- Medical Journal of Australia
- Publisher
- AMPCo
- Published
- 2005-06
- Volume
- 182
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 565-568
- ISSN
- 0025-729X (ISSN-L)
- 1326-5377
- OpenAlex
- W80868730
- Cited by
- 219
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 10.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Vision loss in Australia. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5694/j.1326-5377.2005.tb06815.x
- The paper
- Taylor, H. R., Keeffe, J. E., Vu, H. T. V., Wang, J. J., Rochtchina, E., Mitchell, P., & Pezzullo, M. L. (2005). Vision loss in Australia. Medical Journal of Australia. https://doi.org/10.5694/j.1326-5377.2005.tb06815.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.