CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 201Adolescent and Pediatric HealthcarePediatric Pain Management TechniquesEthics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 44 of the 44 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Self-management in adolescents with chronic illness. What does it mean and how can it be achieved

Sawyer, Susan M, Aroni, Rosalie A·2005·Medical Journal of Australia
DOI 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2005.tb07103.x
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The concept of self-management is based on the notion that it will improve wellbeing and strengthen self-determination and participation in health care, while reducing health care utilisation and health costs. Increasing self-management is a desirable goal for the 15%-20% of children and adolescents who have a significant ongoing health care need related to a chronic health condition. Promoting self-management in young people with chronic illness can be difficult for parents and health care practitioners. Doctors can help parents recognise the potentially competing aspects of the parenting role--protecting young people's health while supporting their growing independence and autonomy. Optimal care may or may not be achievable, depending on a young person's level of development. As children mature through adolescence, they increasingly want their own voice to be heard, as well as the right to privacy and confidentiality in health care consultations. As well as listening to parents and supporting their roles, doctors should see young people alone for part of the consultation, taking a psychosocial history and carefully maintaining confidentiality.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2005.tb07103.x

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 44 references

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Murray CJL, 1996, The global burden of disease
  2. Walker C, 2003, Chronic illness: new perspectives and new directions, 53
  3. Patterson JM, 1998, Diabetes and the adolescent, 3

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 201–201 of 201

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Sawyer, S. M., & Aroni, R. A.
Affiliations
  • Royal Children's Hospital (AU)
  • Monash University (AU)
ORCID
Venue
Medical Journal of Australia
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2005-10
Volume
183
Issue
8
Pages
405-409
ISSN
  • 0025-729X (ISSN-L)
  • 1326-5377
DOI
10.5694/j.1326-5377.2005.tb07103.x
OpenAlex
W2112011443
Cited by
200
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 13
FWCI
17.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
Locations
  • The Medical Journal of Australia (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Adolescent and Pediatric Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Pediatric Pain Management Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare
Keywords
self-management, adolescents, chronic disease, parental role, patient autonomy, confidentiality, psychosocial history, doctor-patient consultation, health care utilization, self-determination
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Australia, Chronic Disease, Female, Humans, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Male, Parent-Child Relations, Physician-Patient Relations, Self Care, Social Support, Adolescent Health Services, Adolescent Development

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review